Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

1.20s

  • State ex rel. Jones v. Indus. Comm.

    1992 Ohio 16 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1992

    In Fisher v. Mayfield (1987), 30 Ohio St.3d 8, 30 OBR 16, 505 N.E.2d 975, and State ex rel. Ormet Corp. v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Pritchard

    131 Ohio St. 3d 97 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 11, 2012

    Bar Assn. v. … Bar Assn. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Burch v. Sheffield-Sheffield Lake City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

    75 Ohio St. 3d 216 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1996

    BURCH, APPELLANT, v. SHEFFIELD-SHEFFIELD LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Burch v. Sheffield-Sheffield Lake City School Dist. … Brown v. Milton-Union Exempted Village Bd. of Edn. (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 21, 531 N.E.2d 1297 (R.C. 4117.10[A] inapplicable where pertinent language predated enactment of R.C. 4117.10); State ex rel. Tavenner v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Cotterman v. St. Marys Foundry

    46 Ohio St. 3d 42 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1989

    Frank Brown & Sons, Inc., v. Indus. … Brown, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Holmes and Wright, JJ., dissent.

    Cited 54 timesPublished
  • Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Lukens

    48 Ohio St. 2d 187 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1976

    After a concerned and extended consideration of the record, the findings of the board of commissioners and the briefs, we are of the conclusion that there is overwhelming evidence to support the board’s finding that respondent … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against Moll

    135 Ohio St. 3d 156 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 6, 2012

    Oster v. Lorain Cty. … See Disciplinary Counsel v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Salem v. Liquor Control Commission

    34 Ohio St. 2d 244 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1973

    Board of Liquor Control (1957), 105 Ohio App. 181, 183 . … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Bituminous Coal Producers Board for District No. 4 v. Starr-Jackson Mining Co.

    135 Ohio St. 429 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 24, 1939

    City of Columbus, v. Mitchell et al., Commrs., 31 Ohio St., 592 , 610; Tone v. Columbus, 39 Ohio St., 281 , 48 Am. Rep., 438 ; Mott v. Hubbard, Treas., 59 Ohio St., 199 , 53 N. E., 47 ; City of Findlay v. … In McLean Coal Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Byers v. Miami County Sheriff's Office

    133 Ohio St. 3d 78 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 5, 2012

    Turner v. … Copen v. Kaley, 11th Dist.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State, Ex Rel. v. Bd. of Edn.

    131 Ohio St. 609 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1936

    A court in exercising the extraordinary power of mandamus takes into consideration the facts and conditions existing at the time it determines whether to issue a peremptory writ (Trumbull County Board of Education v. … McKey, Trustee , v. Cooper, Aud. , 99 Ohio St. 258 .)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. A.A.A. v. City of Columbus

    17 Ohio St. 3d 151 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 29, 1985

    Nichol (1942), 70 Ohio App. 467 [ 25 O.O. 206 ] (board of education); Gund Realty Co. v. Cleveland (1927), 26 Ohio App. 590 (municipal corporation). … See, also, Board of Commrs. v. Flickinger (Colo. 1984), 687 P. 2d 975 ; Ashland v. Hardesty (Ore. App. 1975), 543 P. 2d 41 ; Dunnick v. Stockgrowers Bank of Marmouth (1974), 191 Neb. 370 , 215 N.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Blacker v. Wiethe

    16 Ohio St. 2d 65 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1968

    See Belden v. Union Central Life Ins. Co. (1944), 143 Ohio St. 329 , 55 N. E. 2d 629 , paragraph four of syllabus. … See Mansfield v. Endly (1931), 38 Ohio App. 528, at 538 , 176 N. E. 462 , affirmed 124 Ohio St. 652 , 181 N. E. 886 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Champion Spark Plug Co. v. Lindley

    70 Ohio St. 2d 82 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 19, 1982

    For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is reasonable and lawful and, accordingly, it is hereby affirmed. Decision affirmed. W. Brown, Acting C. … Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur. Reilly, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for Celebrezze, C. J.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Butler Cty. Children Serv. Bd. v. Sage

    95 Ohio St. 3d 23 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 3, 2002

    BUTLER COUNTY CHILDREN SERVICES BOARD, APPELLANT, v. SAGE, JUDGE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Butler Cty. Children Serv. Bd. v. Sage, 2002-Ohio-1494.] … Brown (1991), 59 Ohio St.3d 194, 196, 571 N.E.2d 724; Rath v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Young

    102 Ohio St. 3d 113 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 28, 2004

    V(5)(A)(4). … The board adopted the panel’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommended sanction. {¶ 14} We concur in the board’s findings of misconduct.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Cuckler

    101 Ohio St. 3d 318 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 10, 2004

    Disciplinary Counsel v. Fowerbaugh (1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 187 , 658 N.E.2d 237 , syllabus. … Disciplinary Counsel v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Labor Relations Bureau, Inc. v. Glass

    58 Ohio St. 2d 325 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1979

    Giuliani, v. Perk (1968), 14 Ohio St. 2d 235 ; and State, ex rel. Colgrove, v. Supanick (1975), 41 Ohio St. 2d 141 . Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. Judgment affirmed. Celebrezze, C. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locjier and Holmes. JJ., concur. R. C. 319.16 provides, in pertinent part: ■ “* * *.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Cincinnati Drum Service, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

    52 Ohio St. 3d 135 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1990

    Harris, v. Indus. … Frank Brown & Sons, Inc., v. Indus. Comm. (1988), 37 Ohio St. 3d 162 , 524 N.E. 2d 482 ; and Burton, supra.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In re Application for Formation of the Cleveland Trust Co.

    38 Ohio St. 2d 183 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 22, 1974

    Banking Board (1968), 164 Colo. 564 , 436 P. 2d 681 ; Goldy v. Crane (1968), 167 Colo. 44 , 445 P. 2d 212 ; and Nemirow v. … Brown, JJ., concur. The approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Board is required in such holding company reorganizations as this by the Bank Holding Company Act, Section 1841 et seq., Title 12, U. S.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Balas-Bratton v. Husted

    138 Ohio St. 3d 527 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 2, 2014

    We have therefore refused to issue writs of prohibition against boards of elections if the board is not required to hold a hearing on the matter at issue. State ex rel. Baldzicki v. Cuyahoga Cty. … Hough v. Brown, 50 Ohio St.2d 329, 332, 364 N.E.2d 275 (1977). Thus, under Hough, Husted could not remove or suspend St.

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.