Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.20s
State ex rel. Jones v. Indus. Comm.
1992 Ohio 16 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1992
In Fisher v. Mayfield (1987), 30 Ohio St.3d 8, 30 OBR 16, 505 N.E.2d 975, and State ex rel. Ormet Corp. v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Pritchard
131 Ohio St. 3d 97 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 11, 2012
Bar Assn. v. … Bar Assn. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedState ex rel. Burch v. Sheffield-Sheffield Lake City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.
75 Ohio St. 3d 216 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1996
BURCH, APPELLANT, v. SHEFFIELD-SHEFFIELD LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Burch v. Sheffield-Sheffield Lake City School Dist. … Brown v. Milton-Union Exempted Village Bd. of Edn. (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 21, 531 N.E.2d 1297 (R.C. 4117.10[A] inapplicable where pertinent language predated enactment of R.C. 4117.10); State ex rel. Tavenner v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState ex rel. Cotterman v. St. Marys Foundry
46 Ohio St. 3d 42 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1989
Frank Brown & Sons, Inc., v. Indus. … Brown, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Holmes and Wright, JJ., dissent.
Cited 54 timesPublishedStark County Bar Ass'n v. Lukens
48 Ohio St. 2d 187 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1976
After a concerned and extended consideration of the record, the findings of the board of commissioners and the briefs, we are of the conclusion that there is overwhelming evidence to support the board’s finding that respondent … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 1 timesPublishedIn re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against Moll
135 Ohio St. 3d 156 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 6, 2012
Oster v. Lorain Cty. … See Disciplinary Counsel v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedSalem v. Liquor Control Commission
34 Ohio St. 2d 244 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1973
Board of Liquor Control (1957), 105 Ohio App. 181, 183 . … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 37 timesPublishedBituminous Coal Producers Board for District No. 4 v. Starr-Jackson Mining Co.
135 Ohio St. 429 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 24, 1939
City of Columbus, v. Mitchell et al., Commrs., 31 Ohio St., 592 , 610; Tone v. Columbus, 39 Ohio St., 281 , 48 Am. Rep., 438 ; Mott v. Hubbard, Treas., 59 Ohio St., 199 , 53 N. E., 47 ; City of Findlay v. … In McLean Coal Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Byers v. Miami County Sheriff's Office
133 Ohio St. 3d 78 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 5, 2012
Turner v. … Copen v. Kaley, 11th Dist.
Cited 0 timesPublished131 Ohio St. 609 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1936
A court in exercising the extraordinary power of mandamus takes into consideration the facts and conditions existing at the time it determines whether to issue a peremptory writ (Trumbull County Board of Education v. … McKey, Trustee , v. Cooper, Aud. , 99 Ohio St. 258 .)
Cited 5 timesPublishedState ex rel. A.A.A. v. City of Columbus
17 Ohio St. 3d 151 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 29, 1985
Nichol (1942), 70 Ohio App. 467 [ 25 O.O. 206 ] (board of education); Gund Realty Co. v. Cleveland (1927), 26 Ohio App. 590 (municipal corporation). … See, also, Board of Commrs. v. Flickinger (Colo. 1984), 687 P. 2d 975 ; Ashland v. Hardesty (Ore. App. 1975), 543 P. 2d 41 ; Dunnick v. Stockgrowers Bank of Marmouth (1974), 191 Neb. 370 , 215 N.
Cited 26 timesPublished16 Ohio St. 2d 65 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1968
See Belden v. Union Central Life Ins. Co. (1944), 143 Ohio St. 329 , 55 N. E. 2d 629 , paragraph four of syllabus. … See Mansfield v. Endly (1931), 38 Ohio App. 528, at 538 , 176 N. E. 462 , affirmed 124 Ohio St. 652 , 181 N. E. 886 .
Cited 8 timesPublishedChampion Spark Plug Co. v. Lindley
70 Ohio St. 2d 82 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 19, 1982
For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is reasonable and lawful and, accordingly, it is hereby affirmed. Decision affirmed. W. Brown, Acting C. … Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur. Reilly, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for Celebrezze, C. J.
Cited 2 timesPublishedState ex rel. Butler Cty. Children Serv. Bd. v. Sage
95 Ohio St. 3d 23 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 3, 2002
BUTLER COUNTY CHILDREN SERVICES BOARD, APPELLANT, v. SAGE, JUDGE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Butler Cty. Children Serv. Bd. v. Sage, 2002-Ohio-1494.] … Brown (1991), 59 Ohio St.3d 194, 196, 571 N.E.2d 724; Rath v.
Cited 6 timesPublished102 Ohio St. 3d 113 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 28, 2004
V(5)(A)(4). … The board adopted the panel’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommended sanction. {¶ 14} We concur in the board’s findings of misconduct.
Cited 7 timesPublishedDisciplinary Counsel v. Cuckler
101 Ohio St. 3d 318 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 10, 2004
Disciplinary Counsel v. Fowerbaugh (1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 187 , 658 N.E.2d 237 , syllabus. … Disciplinary Counsel v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedState ex rel. Labor Relations Bureau, Inc. v. Glass
58 Ohio St. 2d 325 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1979
Giuliani, v. Perk (1968), 14 Ohio St. 2d 235 ; and State, ex rel. Colgrove, v. Supanick (1975), 41 Ohio St. 2d 141 . Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. Judgment affirmed. Celebrezze, C. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locjier and Holmes. JJ., concur. R. C. 319.16 provides, in pertinent part: ■ “* * *.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Cincinnati Drum Service, Inc. v. Industrial Commission
52 Ohio St. 3d 135 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1990
Harris, v. Indus. … Frank Brown & Sons, Inc., v. Indus. Comm. (1988), 37 Ohio St. 3d 162 , 524 N.E. 2d 482 ; and Burton, supra.
Cited 7 timesPublishedIn re Application for Formation of the Cleveland Trust Co.
38 Ohio St. 2d 183 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 22, 1974
Banking Board (1968), 164 Colo. 564 , 436 P. 2d 681 ; Goldy v. Crane (1968), 167 Colo. 44 , 445 P. 2d 212 ; and Nemirow v. … Brown, JJ., concur. The approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Board is required in such holding company reorganizations as this by the Bank Holding Company Act, Section 1841 et seq., Title 12, U. S.
Cited 2 timesPublishedState ex rel. Balas-Bratton v. Husted
138 Ohio St. 3d 527 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 2, 2014
We have therefore refused to issue writs of prohibition against boards of elections if the board is not required to hold a hearing on the matter at issue. State ex rel. Baldzicki v. Cuyahoga Cty. … Hough v. Brown, 50 Ohio St.2d 329, 332, 364 N.E.2d 275 (1977). Thus, under Hough, Husted could not remove or suspend St.
Cited 9 timesPublished
Ask Donna