Case law

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Kasson

53 Ohio St. 3d 268 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 12, 1990

Furthermore, although respondent cites Palomo v. State Bar of California (1984), 36 Cal. 3d 786 , 205 Cal. … Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Auto Loan Co. v. Jennings

14 Ohio St. 2d 152 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 8, 1968

Perkins (1864), 36 Vt. 690 ; Columbia Bank v. Jacobs (1862), 10 Mich. 349 ; Arnold v. Brown (1832), 41 Mass. 89 ; Fettyplace v. Dutch (1833), 30 Mass. 388 ; Dobbins v. Hanchett (1886), 20 Ill. App. 396 . … Speeth, v. Board of County Commrs. (1955), 163 Ohio St. 159 , 126 N. E. 2d 449 .

Leon v. Ohio Bd. of Psychology

63 Ohio St. 3d 683 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 26, 1992

Leon, Appellant, v. Ohio Board of Psychology, Appellee. [Cite as Leon v. Ohio Bd. of Psychology (1992), Ohio St. 3d .] Psychologists -- Former Ohio Adm. … Brown, JJ., concur. Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent. FOOTNOTE: 1 Effective October 1, 1990, Ohio Adm.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica

62 Ohio St. 3d 1205 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1991

V(29), respondent’s petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. … For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica (1988), 35 Ohio St.3d 264 , 520 N.E.2d 221 . Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Bradley v. Indus. Comm.

77 Ohio St. 3d 239 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1997

Hopson also noted in the operative report that a preoperative MRI taken of appellee’s knee was “suggestive of a brown cell tumor or Brodie’s abscess. … Noll v. Indus.

Columbus Bar Association v. Okuley.

154 Ohio St. 3d 124 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 26, 2018

V(13)(C)(7). … Bar Assn. v. Azman, 147 Ohio St.3d 379, 2016-Ohio- 3393, 66 N.E.3d 695, and Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. Vardiman, 146 Ohio St.3d 23, 2016-Ohio-352, 51 N.E.3d 587.

State ex rel. McGinn v. Walker (Slip Opinion)

2017 Ohio 7714 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 21, 2017

Walker v. … Cramer v. Brown, 7 Ohio St.3d 5, 6, 454 N.E.2d 1321 (1983). Accordingly, I would grant the writs. O’NEILL, J., concurs in the foregoing opinion. _________________ Terry J.

Cohen v. Estate of Cohen

23 Ohio St. 3d 90 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1986

See Bank v. Board of Edn. of New York (1953), 305 N.Y. 119 , 111 N.E. 2d 238 ; In re Arbuckle’s Estate (1950), 98 Cal. App. 2d 562 , 220 P. 2d 950 . … Brown and Douglas, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C.J., and Wright, J., concur in part and dissent in part.

Lakengren, Inc. v. Kosydar

44 Ohio St. 2d 199 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1975

Miller v. Hixson (1901), 64 Ohio St. 39 , 51, 59 N. E. 749 . See, also, Society v. Wheeler, 2 Gall (U. S. C. C.) 105, 139; Rairden v. Holden (1864), 15 Ohio St. 207 ; Commissioners v. … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals, being unlawful, is reversed. Decision reversed. O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, "W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, J., dissents.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Gittinger

125 Ohio St. 3d 467 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 4, 2010

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Gittinger, 125 Ohio St.3d 467, 2010-Ohio-1830.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. GITTINGER. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. … V(5).

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Foreclosure Solutions, L.L.C.

123 Ohio St. 3d 107 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 26, 2009

The board adopted the panel’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation. {¶ 3} The parties have not filed objections under Gov.Bar R. V(8)(B) to the board’s report. … Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown, 121 Ohio St.3d 423, 2009-Ohio-1152, 905 N.E.2d 163, ¶ 17; Disciplinary Counsel v. Robson, 116 Ohio St.3d 318, 2007-Ohio-6460, 878 N.E.2d 1042, ¶ 10; Cleveland Bar Assn. v.

State ex rel. Citizen Action for a Livable Montgomery v. Hamilton County Board of Elections

115 Ohio St. 3d 437 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 8, 2007

Mason v. … Malone v.

State ex rel. Ruehlmann v. Luken

65 Ohio St. 3d 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1992

R.C. 3501.11 provides in part: “In all cases of a tie vote or a disagreement in the board [of elections], if no decision can be arrived at, the director or chairman shall submit the matter in controversy to the secretary … Ferguson v. Brown (1962), 173 Ohio St. 317 , 320, 19 O.O.2d 227 , 229, 181 N.E.2d 890 , 893, overruled on other grounds State ex rel. Saffold v. Timmins (1970), 22 Ohio St.2d 63 , 51 O.O.2d 95 , 258 N.E.2d 112 .

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Magee (Slip Opinion)

153 Ohio St. 3d 639 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 16, 2018

V(13)(C)(1). {¶ 27} The parties have stipulated and the board has found that the appropriate sanction for Magee’s misconduct is permanent disbarment. … And in Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.

State ex rel. Miller v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)

165 Ohio St. 3d 13 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 18, 2021

MILLER v. HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS ET AL. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Miller v. … Brown v. Butler Cty. Bd. of Elections, 109 Ohio St.3d 63, 2006-Ohio-1292, 846 N.E.2d 8, ¶ 23.

State ex rel. Klein v. Bernon

10 Ohio Law. Abs. 414 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 24, 1930

State ex rel. Schuck v. Columbus (Slip Opinion)

152 Ohio St. 3d 590 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 13, 2018

Minus v. … Beard v.

Bogen v. Clemmer

125 Ohio St. 186 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1932

Mirick v. Gims, Treas., 79 Ohio St., 174 , 86 N. E., 880 , 20 L. R. A. (N. S.), 42. … Miami County v. City of Dayton, and State, ex rel. Duncan, Pros. Atty., v. Franklin County Conservancy District, 92 Ohio St., 215 , 110 N. E., 726 , ninth paragraph of syllabus, approved and followed.

State ex rel. Emhoff v. Medina Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)

153 Ohio St. 3d 313 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 27, 2018

EMHOFF v. MEDINA COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS ET AL. THE STATE EX REL. LOWERY v. MEDINA COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS ET AL. … Quarto Mining Co. v. Foreman, 79 Ohio St.3d 78, 81-82, 679 N.E.2d 706 (1997). This rule applies to proceedings before a county board of elections. See State ex rel. Holwadel v. Hamilton Cty.

Riley v. McNicol

109 Ohio St. 29 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1923

Weiher v. Phillips, 103 Ohio St., 249 , 133 N, E., 67. In Board of County Comm’rs of Franklin County v. Darst, 96 Ohio St., 163 , it is stated in the opinion, at page 167, 117 N. … In the Court of Appeals and in this court counsel for the board complain that that feature of the cause was not submitted to the jury under the evidence offered.