Case law

Toledo Bar Assn. v. Martin

131 Ohio St. 3d 134 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 2011

Disciplinary Counsel v. Broeren, 115 Ohio St.3d 473, 2007-Ohio-5251, 875 N.E.2d 935, ¶ 21. {¶ 12} In mitigation, the board noted that Martin had no prior disciplinary history, BCGD Proc.Reg. 10(B)(2)(a). … O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ William G. Meyer and Michael A.

Bar Ass'n v. Kless

17 Ohio St. 3d 21 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1985

Upon careful review and consideration of the evidence, this court concurs in the finding of the board that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4) and DR 7-101(A)(3) of the Code of Professional Responsibility, and concurs in the … Brown and Douglas, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C.J., Locher and Wright, JJ., dissent.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Bogdanski

135 Ohio St. 3d 235 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 13, 2013

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Bogdanski, 135 Ohio St.3d 235, 2013-Ohio-398.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BOGDANSKI. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. … Bar Assn. v. Buttacavoli, 96 Ohio St.3d 424, 2002-Ohio-4743, 775 N.E.2d 818, ¶ 16; Disciplinary Counsel v.

Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Sakmar

127 Ohio St. 3d 244 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 1, 2010

Bar Assn. v. Sakmar, 127 Ohio St.3d 244, 2010-Ohio-5720.] MAHONING COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. SAKMAR. [Cite as Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. … V(6)(F).

State ex rel. Mirlisena v. Hamilton County Board of Elections

67 Ohio St. 3d 553 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1993

Upon reconsideration, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that a writ of mandamus be, and the same is hereby, granted, consistent with the opinion to follow, and that respondent, Hamilton County Board of Elections, do the … Mirlisena v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Elections (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 445 , 619 N.E.2d 1013 . A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Wright and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Allison

44 Ohio St. 3d 100 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1989

Furthermore, we agree with the recommendation of the board and hereby permanently disbar respondent from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Oakwood Club v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

1994 Ohio 347 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 13, 1994

Oakwood Club, Appellant, v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision et al., Appellees. [Cite as Oakwood Club v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1994), Ohio St.3d .] … See Cincinnati Milacron Industries, Inc. v. Brown Cty. Bd. of Revision (1988), 35 Ohio St.3d 32, 517 N.E.2d 896. See, also, R.R.Z. Assoc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 198, 527 N.E.2d 874.

Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Burkholder

126 Ohio St. 3d 1233 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 26, 2010

V(10)(F), respondent's petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. … BROWN, C.J., and O’DONNELL, J., dissent. ______________________ 2

Maxfield v. Brooks

110 Ohio St. 566 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1924

, which action was by the unanimous vote of the board. … No. 30, Ohio Pite, between Bethel and the Brown county line.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Lowery

58 Ohio St. 3d 72 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1991

We agree with the findings and recommendations of the board. A public reprimand is not an adequate sanction for the code violations with which respondent has been charged. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent and would suspend respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year.

State ex rel. Painesville v. Lake Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

93 Ohio St. 3d 566 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 14, 2001

CITY OF PAINESVILLE, APPELLEE, v. LAKE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Painesville v. Lake Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 2001-Ohio-1609.] … Antonucci v. Youngstown City School Dist.

MDM Holdings, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cnty. Bd. of Revision

2018 Ohio 541 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 24, 2018

See Columbus Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision , 87 Ohio St.3d 305 , 306, 720 N.E.2d 517 (1999) ; AERC Saw Mill Village, Inc. v. Franklin Cty. … But, as we recently held in Life Path Partners, Ltd. v. Cuyahoga Cty.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Asante

133 Ohio St. 3d 102 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 4, 2012

. {¶ 2} We rejected the board’s recommendation and remanded the matter to the board “for further proceedings, including consideration of a harsher sanction.” Disciplinary Counsel v. … Columbus Bar Assn. v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Armengau

99 Ohio St. 3d 55 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 16, 2003

Respondent answered, and a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline (“board”) heard the cause. {¶ 2} Prior to the hearing, the parties stipulated to certain facts and to three violations of the Code … Brown, First Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator. Javier H. Armengau, pro se. {¶ 8} The panel found that respondent had committed the stipulated violations.

Holben v. Interstate Motor Freight System

31 Ohio St. 3d 152 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1987

Brown, J. … See, also, State v. Kuhner & King (1923), 107 Ohio St. 406 , 421, 140 N.E. 344 , 348; Mut. Finance Co. v. Politzer (1970), 21 Ohio St. 2d 177, 183-184 , 50 O.O. 2d 397, 401, 256 N.E. 2d 606, 611 .

Disciplinary Counsel v. Kinane

87 Ohio St. 3d 221 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1999

V(11)(B). … Brown, First Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator. __________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 7} We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board but not its recommendation.

Avon Lake City School District v. Limbach

35 Ohio St. 3d 118 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1988

Ross v. … Brown, JJ., concur. Locher, J., concurs in judgment only.

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Cohodes

22 Ohio St. 3d 221 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1986

After a thorough examination of the record in this cause, this court concurs with the findings and conclusions of the board that respondent’s conduct constituted violations of DR 1-102(A)(1), (3), (4) and (6) and DR 9-102 … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

In Re Application of Jia

145 Ohio St. 3d 387 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 11, 2016

The board adopted the panel’s findings of fact and recommendation. {¶ 4} We adopt the board’s findings of fact and disapprove Jia’s character, fitness, and moral qualifications and her application for admission to … O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. _________________ Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter, L.P.A., and Jonathan E.

State ex rel. Mansfield v. Mahoning County Board of Elections

40 Ohio St. 3d 16 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1988

Senn, v. … Brown, JJ., concur.