The opinion
Per Curiam.
This court finds that respondent violated DR ■ 1-102(A)(1) and (3) (four violations), (4) (three violations), (5) (two violations), and (6) (four violations), 9-102(A)(2) (two violations), 9-102(B)(4), and Gov. Bar R. VI. Furthermore, we agree with the recommendation of the board and hereby permanently disbar respondent from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.