Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

2.48s

  • Lake County National Bank of Painesville v. Kosydar

    36 Ohio St. 2d 189 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 26, 1973

    In the latter case, “the strict letter of an act must * * * yield to its evident spirit and purpose * * Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States (1926), 270 U. S. 349, 360 . See, also, Cochrel v. … BrowN, JJ., concur.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Johnson v. Cleveland Heights/University Heights School District Board of Education

    73 Ohio St. 3d 189 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 16, 1995

    Chavis v. Sycamore City School Dist. … Rollins v. Cleveland Hts.-Univ. Hts.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Ryan

    45 Ohio St. 3d 374 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1989

    Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we concur in the board’s findings and recommendation. Respondent is hereby suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Treska v. Trumble

    4 Ohio St. 3d 150 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1983

    Paragraph two of the syllabus in Morris v. … Brown, JJ., concur. W. Brown, J., concurs in judgment only. Mahoney, J., of the Ninth Appellate District, sitting for Locher, J. Dahling, J., of the Eleventh Appellate District, sitting by assignment.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Burkholder

    126 Ohio St. 3d 1233 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 26, 2010

    V(10)(F), respondent's petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. … BROWN, C.J., and O’DONNELL, J., dissent. ______________________ 2

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bar Ass'n v. Kless

    17 Ohio St. 3d 21 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1985

    Upon careful review and consideration of the evidence, this court concurs in the finding of the board that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4) and DR 7-101(A)(3) of the Code of Professional Responsibility, and concurs in the … Brown and Douglas, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C.J., Locher and Wright, JJ., dissent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Stubbs

    128 Ohio St. 3d 344 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 15, 2011

    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Stubbs, 128 Ohio St.3d 344, 2011-Ohio-553.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. STUBBS. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Stubbs, 128 Ohio St.3d 344, 2011-Ohio-553.] … See Columbus Bar Assn. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Lewis v. Board of Education of Wilmington School District

    137 Ohio St. (N.S.) 145 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1940

    The court cannot control that discretion or substitute its own discretion for that of the board of education. … The court thus would be making a selection that is within the absolute power and discretion of the board of education.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hal Artz Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.

    28 Ohio St. 3d 20 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1986

    Ayres (1949), 152 Ohio St. 255 [ 40 O.O. 312 ] (Board of Tax Appeals); Diltz v. Crouch (1962), 173 Ohio St. 367 [ 19 O.O.2d 312 ] (Board of Liquor Control); State, ex rel. Prayner, v. Indus. … Brown and Wright, JJ., concur. Locher, J., concurs in judgment only. Douglas, J., dissents. Neither the propriety of the dealers board’s rehearing order nor its original decision is before us in this appeal.

    Cited 236 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Young

    126 Ohio St. 3d 1223 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 20, 2010

    V(10)(F), respondent’s petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. … BROWN, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Meck v. Board of Deputy State Supervisors of Elections

    111 Ohio St. (N.S.) 203 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1924

    to the board of deputy state supervisors of the county in such district in which the nomination papers were originally filed, which board shall proceed to canvass all of the returns so made of the votes cast for the respective … Wood, v. Russell et al., Deputy State Supervisors, 101 Ohio St., 365 , 130 N. E., 19 . We quote the following from page 367 of the opinion, of 101 Ohio St., ( 130 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ohio Ass'n of Public School Employees v. Stark County Board of Education

    63 Ohio St. 3d 300 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1992

    The rationale for delegating power to bodies such as county boards of education was explained in Panama Refining Co. v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Nese v. State Teachers Retirement Bd. of Ohio

    136 Ohio St. 3d 103 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 2, 2013

    See generally Browning, Will Residency Be Relevant to Public Education in the Twenty-First Century?, 8 Pierce L.Rev. 297, 338-339 (2010). … Thus, “ ‘[a]s long as there is sufficient evidence to support [a] retirement-system board’s decisions, we will not disturb them.’ ” State ex rel. Marchiano v. School Emps.

    Cited 56 timesPublished
  • VMS Ohio Hotel Associates v. Franklin County Board of Revision

    71 Ohio St. 3d 586 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1995

    Seckel, the school board’s appraiser, testified that it was not proper to take a separate expense deduction for franchise fees here because they were already included in general expenses. … Bd. of Edn. v. Lake Cty.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Columbus Bar Assn. v. Squeo

    133 Ohio St. 3d 536 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 31, 2012

    Disciplinary Counsel v. … Bar Assn. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Health Care REIT, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)

    140 Ohio St. 3d 30 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 18, 2014

    Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. … HealthSouth Corp. v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Argonne Post No. 545 v. Board of Liquor Control

    162 Ohio St. (N.S.) 145 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1954

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Meade

    127 Ohio St. 3d 393 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 22, 2010

    V(9). The board adopted the master commissioner’s report in its entirety. … V(9).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Canton v. Imperial Bowling Lanes, Inc.

    16 Ohio St. 2d 47 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1968

    Cooper, v. Savord (1950), 153 Ohio St. 367 , 92 N. … Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Doyle, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur. Doyle, J., of the Ninth Appellate District sitting for HERBERT, J.

    Cited 53 timesPublished
  • In Re Application of Jia

    145 Ohio St. 3d 387 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 11, 2016

    The board adopted the panel’s findings of fact and recommendation. {¶ 4} We adopt the board’s findings of fact and disapprove Jia’s character, fitness, and moral qualifications and her application for admission to … O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. _________________ Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter, L.P.A., and Jonathan E.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.