Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.48s
Lake County National Bank of Painesville v. Kosydar
36 Ohio St. 2d 189 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 26, 1973
In the latter case, “the strict letter of an act must * * * yield to its evident spirit and purpose * * Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States (1926), 270 U. S. 349, 360 . See, also, Cochrel v. … BrowN, JJ., concur.
Cited 17 timesPublishedState ex rel. Johnson v. Cleveland Heights/University Heights School District Board of Education
73 Ohio St. 3d 189 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 16, 1995
Chavis v. Sycamore City School Dist. … Rollins v. Cleveland Hts.-Univ. Hts.
Cited 12 timesPublished45 Ohio St. 3d 374 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1989
Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we concur in the board’s findings and recommendation. Respondent is hereby suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 1 timesPublished4 Ohio St. 3d 150 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1983
Paragraph two of the syllabus in Morris v. … Brown, JJ., concur. W. Brown, J., concurs in judgment only. Mahoney, J., of the Ninth Appellate District, sitting for Locher, J. Dahling, J., of the Eleventh Appellate District, sitting by assignment.
Cited 3 timesPublishedOhio State Bar Assn. v. Burkholder
126 Ohio St. 3d 1233 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 26, 2010
V(10)(F), respondent's petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. … BROWN, C.J., and O’DONNELL, J., dissent. ______________________ 2
Cited 0 timesPublished17 Ohio St. 3d 21 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1985
Upon careful review and consideration of the evidence, this court concurs in the finding of the board that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4) and DR 7-101(A)(3) of the Code of Professional Responsibility, and concurs in the … Brown and Douglas, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C.J., Locher and Wright, JJ., dissent.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDisciplinary Counsel v. Stubbs
128 Ohio St. 3d 344 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 15, 2011
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Stubbs, 128 Ohio St.3d 344, 2011-Ohio-553.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. STUBBS. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Stubbs, 128 Ohio St.3d 344, 2011-Ohio-553.] … See Columbus Bar Assn. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState ex rel. Lewis v. Board of Education of Wilmington School District
137 Ohio St. (N.S.) 145 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1940
The court cannot control that discretion or substitute its own discretion for that of the board of education. … The court thus would be making a selection that is within the absolute power and discretion of the board of education.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHal Artz Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.
28 Ohio St. 3d 20 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1986
Ayres (1949), 152 Ohio St. 255 [ 40 O.O. 312 ] (Board of Tax Appeals); Diltz v. Crouch (1962), 173 Ohio St. 367 [ 19 O.O.2d 312 ] (Board of Liquor Control); State, ex rel. Prayner, v. Indus. … Brown and Wright, JJ., concur. Locher, J., concurs in judgment only. Douglas, J., dissents. Neither the propriety of the dealers board’s rehearing order nor its original decision is before us in this appeal.
Cited 236 timesPublished126 Ohio St. 3d 1223 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 20, 2010
V(10)(F), respondent’s petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. … BROWN, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Meck v. Board of Deputy State Supervisors of Elections
111 Ohio St. (N.S.) 203 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1924
to the board of deputy state supervisors of the county in such district in which the nomination papers were originally filed, which board shall proceed to canvass all of the returns so made of the votes cast for the respective … Wood, v. Russell et al., Deputy State Supervisors, 101 Ohio St., 365 , 130 N. E., 19 . We quote the following from page 367 of the opinion, of 101 Ohio St., ( 130 N.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOhio Ass'n of Public School Employees v. Stark County Board of Education
63 Ohio St. 3d 300 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1992
The rationale for delegating power to bodies such as county boards of education was explained in Panama Refining Co. v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState ex rel. Nese v. State Teachers Retirement Bd. of Ohio
136 Ohio St. 3d 103 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 2, 2013
See generally Browning, Will Residency Be Relevant to Public Education in the Twenty-First Century?, 8 Pierce L.Rev. 297, 338-339 (2010). … Thus, “ ‘[a]s long as there is sufficient evidence to support [a] retirement-system board’s decisions, we will not disturb them.’ ” State ex rel. Marchiano v. School Emps.
Cited 56 timesPublishedVMS Ohio Hotel Associates v. Franklin County Board of Revision
71 Ohio St. 3d 586 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1995
Seckel, the school board’s appraiser, testified that it was not proper to take a separate expense deduction for franchise fees here because they were already included in general expenses. … Bd. of Edn. v. Lake Cty.
Cited 0 timesPublished133 Ohio St. 3d 536 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 31, 2012
Disciplinary Counsel v. … Bar Assn. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedHealth Care REIT, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)
140 Ohio St. 3d 30 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 18, 2014
Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. … HealthSouth Corp. v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedState ex rel. Argonne Post No. 545 v. Board of Liquor Control
162 Ohio St. (N.S.) 145 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1954
Cited 0 timesPublished127 Ohio St. 3d 393 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 22, 2010
V(9). The board adopted the master commissioner’s report in its entirety. … V(9).
Cited 2 timesPublishedCanton v. Imperial Bowling Lanes, Inc.
16 Ohio St. 2d 47 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1968
Cooper, v. Savord (1950), 153 Ohio St. 367 , 92 N. … Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Doyle, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur. Doyle, J., of the Ninth Appellate District sitting for HERBERT, J.
Cited 53 timesPublished145 Ohio St. 3d 387 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 11, 2016
The board adopted the panel’s findings of fact and recommendation. {¶ 4} We adopt the board’s findings of fact and disapprove Jia’s character, fitness, and moral qualifications and her application for admission to … O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. _________________ Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter, L.P.A., and Jonathan E.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna