Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

1.35s

  • Knight v. Administrator, Ohio Bureau of Employment Services

    28 Ohio St. 3d 8 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1986

    The standard of review for a court of common pleas reviewing a board of review’s decision is set forth in R.C. 4141.28(O). … Brown and Wright, JJ., concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Columbus Bar Assn. v. Hunter

    130 Ohio St. 3d 355 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 15, 2011

    Disciplinary Counsel v. … See Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Portage Cty. Educators Assn. for Dev. Disabilities-Unit B, OEA/NEA v. State Emp. Relations Bd.

    169 Ohio St. 3d 167 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 13, 2022

    , place, and manner regulation is unavailing. {¶ 22} For their part, SERB and the board rely on Frisby v. … Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 466-467, 100 S.Ct. 2286, 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980), quoting Edwards v. 17 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229,

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Veneziano

    120 Ohio St. 3d 451 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 30, 2008

    Bar Assn. v. Veneziano, 120 Ohio St.3d 451, 2008-Ohio-6789.] CUYAHOGA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. VENEZIANO. [Cite as Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. … Bar Assn. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Blackman v. Hitte

    5 Ohio St. 3d 156 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1983

    Madison, v. Cotner (1981), 66 Ohio St. 2d 448, 451 [ 20 O.O.3d 381 ]. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Herrold

    61 Ohio St. 3d 542 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 28, 1991

    We agree with the board’s findings and its recommendation. Accordingly, we order that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. … Brown, J.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. McWherter

    57 Ohio St. 3d 17 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1991

    We adopt the findings and recommendations of the board and order respondent indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Ohio Roundtable, Inc. v. Taft

    76 Ohio St. 3d 643 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 17, 1996

    Cramer v. Brown (1983), 7 Ohio St.3d 5, 6 , 7 OBR 317, 317-318, 454 N.E.2d 1321, 1322 ; State ex rel. Cappelletti v. Celebrezze (1980), 64 Ohio St.2d 1, 3 , 18 O.O.3d 38, 38-39 , 411 N.E.2d 193, 194 . … Huebner v. W.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Haynes

    88 Ohio St. 3d 164 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 22, 2000

    . {¶ 8} We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. … Bar Assn. v. Smith (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 402, 709 N.E.2d 116; Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Kates (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 69, 676 N.E.2d 512; Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. Tscholl (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 211, 567 N.E.2d 265.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Rubenstein

    49 Ohio St. 3d 11 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1990

    We agree that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3), 1-102(A)(4), and 1402(A)(6), and we also adopt the board’s recommendations. Respondent is hereby permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Davis

    130 Ohio St. 3d 440 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 29, 2011

    Bar Assn. v. … In Columbus Bar Assn. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Klunk

    17 Ohio St. 3d 43 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1985

    Upon a review of the record herein, it is the determination of the court that respondent has violated DR 1-102(A)(1), DR 1-102(A)(3), DR 1-102(A)(4) and DR 1-102(A)(6), and we hereby accept the recommendation of the board … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Kellogg

    126 Ohio St. 3d 360 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 20, 2010

    In Toledo Bar Assn. v. … Brown, C.J., not participating. . The misbranded product claimed to contain ingredients that it did not.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Marshall v. Keller

    15 Ohio St. 2d 203 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1968

    Szekely v. Young, 174 Ohio St. 213 ; Section 4123.519, Revised Code. … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neihl and Brown, JJ., concur. Herbert and Schneider, JJ., dissent.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Gaba

    64 Ohio St. 3d 35 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1992

    We also agree with the sanction recommended by the board. Therefore, respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Hall v. Board of Trustees of Police Relief & Pension Fund

    149 Ohio St. 367 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1948

    Under the law of Ohio prior to September 25, 1947, there could be established in any municipal corporation having a police department, supported in whole or in part at public expense, a police relief fund distributed by a board … Atty., v. Maharry, 97 Ohio St., 272 , 119 N.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Wrenn

    99 Ohio St. 3d 222 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 9, 2003

    V(6)(L), the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline adopted the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the panel. … Bar Assn. v. Buttacavoli 96 Ohio St.3d 424 , 2002-Ohio-4743 , 775 N.E.2d 818 ; Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Marsick (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 551 , 692 N.E.2d 991 ; Disciplinary *226 Counsel v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McCord

    96 Ohio St. 3d 21 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 19, 2002

    Brown, First Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator. Michael M. … examined the record in this case and adopt the findings of the board.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Lust v. Board of Deputy State Supervisors of Elections

    110 Ohio St. (N.S.) 240 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1924

    .” *244 Evidence was given in the Court of Appeals, over objection, by the clerk of the board of elections of Polk township, Crawford county, Ohio, at the election of November 6, 1923, that he made the marks in question when … The use of Roman numerals, particularly the “•V” and the “X,” is extremely common in this country, and is taught in the schools.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of County Commissioners v. Unknown Heirs, Devisees & Legal Representatives of Cooper

    152 Ohio St. (N.S.) 202 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1949

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.