Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Klunk

  • 17 Ohio St. 3d 43
  • 17 Ohio B. 35
  • 476 N.E.2d 1051
  • 1985 Ohio LEXIS 306
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Apr 24, 1985
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Celebrezze, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 53.9%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon a review of the record herein, it is the determination of the court that respondent has violated DR 1-102(A)(1), DR 1-102(A)(3), DR 1-102(A)(4) and DR 1-102(A)(6), and we hereby accept the recommendation of the board of commissioners.

Therefore, it is the order of the court that respondent be permanently disbarred from the practice of law in the state of Ohio. The court further orders that the costs of these proceedings shall be taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.