Case law

Disciplinary Counsel v. Meehan

133 Ohio St. 3d 51 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 29, 2012

We adopt the board’s recommendation. {¶ 10} In a classic instance of practicing law while under suspension, disbarment is appropriate. See Akron Bar Assn. v. … Toledo Bar Assn. v.

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Zavac

40 Ohio St. 3d 337 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1988

Having thoroughly reviewed the instant record, this court concurs with the board’s findings and its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. … Brown, JJ., concur.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Richardson

21 Ohio St. 3d 54 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1986

Upon a careful review of the entire record, we concur with the findings of the board in all respects. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Paulson

43 Ohio St. 3d 150 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1989

We concur with the board’s findings and its recommendation. Respondent is to repay Patricia J. Landis the $100 he received from her and is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Board of County Commrs. v. Jenkins

155 Ohio St. (N.S.) 402 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 16, 1951

“Therefore, be it further resolved, that the clerk of this board certify a copy of this resolution to the Board of Elections of Jackson County, and the board of elections give notice as required by law.” … The relator board relies on the decision of this *407 court in the case of State, ex rel. Wuebker, v. Bockrath, 152 Ohio St., 77 , 87 N. E. (2d), 462. That case is readily distinguishable on the facts.

Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association v. Pryatel

145 Ohio St. 3d 398 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 9, 2016

Bar Assn. v. … Bar Assn. v. Brown, 143 Ohio St.3d 333, 2015-Ohio-2344, 37 N.E.3d 1199, ¶ 15.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Trieu

132 Ohio St. 3d 288 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 20, 2012

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Trieu, 132 Ohio St.3d 288, 2012-Ohio-2714.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. TRIEU. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Trieu, 132 Ohio St.3d 288, 2012-Ohio-2714.] … Sanction {¶ 10} In recommending a sanction, the board considered the aggravating and mitigating factors listed in BCGD Proc.Reg. 10. See Disciplinary Counsel v.

State ex rel. Donah v. Windham Exempted Village School District Board of Education

69 Ohio St. 3d 114 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1994

Where a school board has authorized compensation for duties performed in addition to a teacher’s regular duties, R.C. 3319.08 mandates that the school board shall issue a supplemental limited contract to the teacher performing … However, there is no statute authorizing a board of education to enter into supplemental contracts with nonteaching employees. Hall v. Lakeview Local School Dist.

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Kile

55 Ohio St. 3d 20 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1990

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Raines

37 Ohio St. 3d 165 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1988

This court finds that respondent violated the Disciplinary Rules indicated by the board and we adopt its recommendation. Respondent is hereby ordered permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. … Brown, JJ., concur.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Konet

40 Ohio St. 3d 256 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1988

This court concurs in the board’s findings and its recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded for having committed the described misconduct. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. … Brown, JJ., concur.

Basham v. Jackson

54 Ohio St. 2d 366 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1978

Moritz, v. Troop (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 90 , 338 N. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. In passing, it should be noted that R. C. 2743.02 was amended, effective February 7, 1978. R.

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Reed

53 Ohio St. 3d 8 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1990

We concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and recommendation. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 9-102(A) and 9-102(B)(l) and (3). Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Jackson v. Board of County Commissioners

122 Ohio St. (N.S.) 456 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1930

The latest pronouncement of this court upon this subject was made in the case of Board of Education of Ashville Village School Dist. v. Briggs, Aud., 114 Ohio St., 415 , 151 N.

Akron Bar Assn. v. Miller

130 Ohio St. 3d 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 7, 2011

[Cite as Akron Bar Assn. v. Miller, 130 Ohio St.3d 1, 2011-Ohio-4412.] AKRON BAR ASSOCIATION v. MILLER. [Cite as Akron Bar Assn. v. Miller, 130 Ohio St.3d 1, 2011-Ohio-4412.] … Disciplinary Counsel v. Detweiler, 127 Ohio St.3d 73, 2010-Ohio-5033, 936 N.E.2d 498; Allen Cty. Bar Assn. v.

In re Application of Martin

134 Ohio St. 3d 154 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 28, 2012

The board adopted the panel’s report in its entirety. … O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.

Geauga County Bar Ass'n v. Taber

50 Ohio St. 3d 226 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1990

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded for twice violating DR 6-101(A)(3). … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Yorkavitz v. Board of Township Trustees of Columbia Township

166 Ohio St. (N.S.) 349 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 8, 1957

See Barrier v. Troutman, 231 N. C., 47 , 55 S. E. (2d), 923 ; Batcheller v. Commonwealth, ex rel., 176 Va., 109 , 10 S. E. (2d), 529 ; Brandes v. … Mitterling, 67 Ariz., 349 , 196 P. (2d), 464 ; Warren Township School Dist. v. City of Detroit, 308 Mich., 460 , 14 N. W. (2d) 134 ; Kuntz v. Werner Flying Service, Inc., 257 Wis., 405 , 43 N. W. (2d), 476 ; and Crew v.

State ex rel. Hibbs v. Board of County Commissioners

35 Ohio St. (N.S.) 458 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1880

Cricket v. State, 18 Ohio St. 9 ; State v. The Judges, 21 Ohio St. 1 ; State v. Covington, 29 Ohio St. 102 ; McGill v. The State, 34 Ohio St. 228 , 269. … People v. Flagg, 46 N. Y. 401 ; Philadelphia v. Field, 58 Penn. St. 320. See Lima v. McBride, 34 Ohio St. 338 .

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. DeMars

56 Ohio St. 3d 90 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1990

We concur with the board’s assessment and recommendation. Respondent’s petition for readmission to the practice of law is denied. Costs taxed to the respondent. Judgment accordingly. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.