Opinion

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. DeMars

56 Ohio St. 3d 90
564 N.E.2d 431
1990 Ohio LEXIS 1724

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Dec 12, 1990
Status: Published
On the bench: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by: 0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Relator’s request for a continuance to file its brief is denied, and oral argument has been waived by the parties. We concur with the board’s assessment and recommendation. Respondent’s petition for readmission to the practice of law is denied. Costs taxed to the respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.