Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.21s
Board of Education v. Board of Education
58 Ohio St. (N.S.) 390 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1898
The board of education of any township, district, (sub-district) joint sub-district, special or village district, within the state of Ohio, shall permit children of school age who reside further than one and one-half miles … of education of such district, be paid by the board of education of the district where such children have a legal residence. ” * * * Counsel for the plaintiff in error contend that the distance from residence to school is
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Board of Education
58 Ohio St. (N.S.) 705 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 3, 1898
whereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this court proceeding to render the judgment which said circuit court should have rendered, it is ordered and adjudged' that the judgment of said court of common pleas in favor of The Board
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Edn. v. Board of Edn.
31 Ohio Law Rep. 59 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 19, 1965
J., Matthias, O’Neill and Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Commissioners v. Board of Commissioners
80 Ohio St. (N.S.) 737 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 25, 1909
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Board of Education
88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 549 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1913
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Commissioners v. Board of Commissioners
93 Ohio St. (N.S.) 37 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1915
to challenge the constitutionality of the act under which it jointly, with the board of county commissioners of Mercer county, invoked the jurisdiction of that court. … Tone v. Columbus, 39 Ohio St., 281 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Board of Education
72 Ohio St. (N.S.) 654 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 16, 1905
Cited 0 timesPublished169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 50 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1959
I concur in the judgment for the reason that, in my opinion, the Court of Common Pleas of Brown County was without any jurisdiction to entertain this election contest. … Since the issue to be determined by the voters in the present case involved a district, a portion of which is in Highland County and a portion of which is in Brown County, the district is larger than a county as contemplated
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Board of Education
67 Ohio St. (N.S.) 515 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 11, 1902
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Board of Education
88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 588 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1913
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Commissioners v. Board of Commissioners
64 Ohio St. (N.S.) 160 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1901
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Board of Education
78 Ohio St. (N.S.) 438 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1908
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. High School Board
160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 234 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1953
It did not confer upon the appellants herein, the director of education and the High School Board, the right to appeal from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas rendered on appeal from an order of the Department of Education … Corn v. Board of Liquor Control, ante, 9, 113 N. E. (2d), 360. The motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained, and the appeal is dismissed. Appeal dismissed. Wbygandt, C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Franklin County Board of Revision
118 Ohio St. 3d 45 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 9, 2008
. {¶ 1} This appeal presents another occasion for this court to decide whether the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) properly applied our holding in Berea City School Dist Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. … In Cincinnati Bd. of Edn. v. Hamilton Cty.
Cited 5 timesPublished69 Ohio St. 3d 672 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1994
The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Med. Ctr. (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 638 , 635 N.E.2d 331 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision
74 Ohio St. 3d 415 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1996
The BTA has discretion in admitting evidence, Ohio Turnpike Comm. v. Ellis (1955), 164 Ohio St. 377 , 58 O.O. 179 , 131 N.E.2d 397 , paragraph eight of the syllabus; Akron v. Pub. Util. … Witt Co. v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 155 , 573 N.E.2d 661 . *417 Unless the BTA abuses this discretion, we will affirm its decision. Webb Corp. v. Lucas Cty.
Cited 25 timesPublished65 Ohio St. 3d 1465 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1992
On motion to consolidate with State v. Ulis (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 83 , 600 N.E.2d 1040 . Motion denied. Resnick, J., not participating.
Cited 0 timesPublished93 Ohio St. 3d 1227 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 28, 2001
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BROWN. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown, 2001-Ohio-1804.] (No. 98-399—Submitted October 16, 2001—Decided November 2, 2001.) … V(10)(F), respondent’s amended petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna