Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

1.21s

  • Board of Education v. Board of Education

    58 Ohio St. (N.S.) 390 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1898

    The board of education of any township, district, (sub-district) joint sub-district, special or village district, within the state of Ohio, shall permit children of school age who reside further than one and one-half miles … of education of such district, be paid by the board of education of the district where such children have a legal residence. ” * * * Counsel for the plaintiff in error contend that the distance from residence to school is

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Board of Education

    58 Ohio St. (N.S.) 705 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 3, 1898

    whereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this court proceeding to render the judgment which said circuit court should have rendered, it is ordered and adjudged' that the judgment of said court of common pleas in favor of The Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Edn. v. Board of Edn.

    31 Ohio Law Rep. 59 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 19, 1965

    J., Matthias, O’Neill and Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. Board of Commissioners

    80 Ohio St. (N.S.) 737 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 25, 1909

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Board of Education

    88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 549 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1913

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. Board of Commissioners

    93 Ohio St. (N.S.) 37 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1915

    to challenge the constitutionality of the act under which it jointly, with the board of county commissioners of Mercer county, invoked the jurisdiction of that court. … Tone v. Columbus, 39 Ohio St., 281 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Board of Education

    72 Ohio St. (N.S.) 654 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 16, 1905

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McCall v. Board of Education

    169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 50 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1959

    I concur in the judgment for the reason that, in my opinion, the Court of Common Pleas of Brown County was without any jurisdiction to entertain this election contest. … Since the issue to be determined by the voters in the present case involved a district, a portion of which is in Highland County and a portion of which is in Brown County, the district is larger than a county as contemplated

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Board of Education

    67 Ohio St. (N.S.) 515 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 11, 1902

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Board of Education

    88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 588 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1913

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. Board of Commissioners

    64 Ohio St. (N.S.) 160 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1901

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Board of Education

    78 Ohio St. (N.S.) 438 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1908

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. High School Board

    160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 234 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1953

    It did not confer upon the appellants herein, the director of education and the High School Board, the right to appeal from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas rendered on appeal from an order of the Department of Education … Corn v. Board of Liquor Control, ante, 9, 113 N. E. (2d), 360. The motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained, and the appeal is dismissed. Appeal dismissed. Wbygandt, C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of Revision

    118 Ohio St. 3d 45 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 9, 2008

    . {¶ 1} This appeal presents another occasion for this court to decide whether the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) properly applied our holding in Berea City School Dist Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. … In Cincinnati Bd. of Edn. v. Hamilton Cty.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Lattimore v. Brown

    69 Ohio St. 3d 672 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1994

    The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Med. Ctr. (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 638 , 635 N.E.2d 331 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

    74 Ohio St. 3d 415 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1996

    The BTA has discretion in admitting evidence, Ohio Turnpike Comm. v. Ellis (1955), 164 Ohio St. 377 , 58 O.O. 179 , 131 N.E.2d 397 , paragraph eight of the syllabus; Akron v. Pub. Util. … Witt Co. v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 155 , 573 N.E.2d 661 . *417 Unless the BTA abuses this discretion, we will affirm its decision. Webb Corp. v. Lucas Cty.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    65 Ohio St. 3d 1465 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1992

    On motion to consolidate with State v. Ulis (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 83 , 600 N.E.2d 1040 . Motion denied. Resnick, J., not participating.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

    93 Ohio St. 3d 1227 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 28, 2001

    OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BROWN. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown, 2001-Ohio-1804.] (No. 98-399—Submitted October 16, 2001—Decided November 2, 2001.) … V(10)(F), respondent’s amended petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    39 Ohio St. 3d 710 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1988

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    39 Ohio St. 3d 701 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1988

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.