Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. Board of Commissioners

  • 64 Ohio St. (N.S.) 160
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Feb 5, 1901
Status
Published
On the bench
Burket, Davis, Shauck, Spear
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

By the Court :

It is entirely clear that the record shows no judgment or final order of the probate court that can be reviewed on error. The statute provides for further proceedings subsequent to the appointment of the *162 committee, which may result in the complete exoneration of the upper county and of the lands therein from any burden for the proposed improvement of the water course, or in a final order or judgment imposing such burden. If the former result shall be reached through the report of the committee that the upper county should bear no part of the burden, there can be no ground for a proceeding in error in its behalf, nor can there be until such burden is imposed by the judgment or order of the court.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Spear, Burket and Davis, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.