Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

  • 93 Ohio St. 3d 1227
  • 2001 Ohio 1804
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Nov 28, 2001
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 35.0%

The opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 1227.]

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BROWN.

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown, 2001-Ohio-1804.]

(No. 98-399—Submitted October 16, 2001—Decided November 2, 2001.)

ON AMENDED PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT.

__________________

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an

amended petition for reinstatement by respondent, Paul Raymond Brown. In

accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(10)(F), respondent’s amended petition for

reinstatement was referred to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and

Discipline. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline filed its

Final Report in this court on August 29, 2001, recommending that Paul Raymond

Brown be reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. No objections to

said Final Report were filed.

{¶ 2} The court now considers its order of November 10, 1998, indefinitely

suspending respondent, Paul Raymond Brown, from the practice of law pursuant to

Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(2). On consideration thereof, and the Final Report of the

Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline,

{¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT that the respondent, Paul

Raymond Brown, Attorney Registration No. 0037693, last known business address

in Columbus, Ohio, be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio.

{¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that respondent be taxed

the costs of these proceedings in the amount of $963.39, less the deposit of $500,

for a total balance due of $463.39, which costs shall be payable to this court on or

before ninety days from the date of this order, by certified check or money order. It

is further ordered that if these costs are not paid in full on or before ninety days

from the date of this order, interest at the rate of ten percent per annum shall accrue

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

as of ninety days from the date of this order, on the balance of unpaid board costs.

It is further ordered that if costs are not paid in full on or before ninety days from

the date of this order, respondent may be found in contempt and may be suspended

until costs, including any accrued interest, are paid in full.

{¶ 5} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue

certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that

publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent

bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 6} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown (1998), 84 Ohio

St.3d 1, 701 N.E.2d 681.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and

LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

__________________

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.