Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

0.86s

  • ITT Canteen Corp. v. Porterfield

    30 Ohio St. 2d 155 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 17, 1972

    Appellant cites Leader v. Glander (1948), 149 Ohio St. 1 , for the proposition that the cigarette excise taxes *157 levied by R. … J., Schneider, Herbert, Stern, Leach and Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Grava v. Parkman Township

    73 Ohio St. 3d 379 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 30, 1995

    See Whitehead v. Gen. Tel. Co. (1969), 20 Ohio St.2d 108 , 49 O.O.2d 435 , 254 N.E.2d 10 ; Krahn v. … Amusements, Inc. v.

    Cited 1,129 timesPublished
  • Akron Bar Assn. v. Gibson

    128 Ohio St. 3d 347 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 16, 2011

    [Cite as Akron Bar Assn. v. Gibson, 128 Ohio St.3d 347, 2011-Ohio-628.] AKRON BAR ASSN. v. GIBSON. [Cite as Akron Bar Assn. v. Gibson, 128 Ohio St.3d 347, 2011-Ohio-628.] … Disciplinary Counsel v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sheffield v. Rowland

    87 Ohio St. 3d 9 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1999

    Michele Fleming, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Browning-Ferris Industries of Ohio, Inc. Barry M. Byron, Stephen L. … Middleburg Hts. v. Ohio Bd. of Bldg.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Medina Cty. Bar Assn. v. Grieselhuber

    78 Ohio St. 3d 373 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 14, 1997

    MEDINA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION V. GRIESELHUBER. [Cite as Medina Cty. Bar Assn. v. Grieselhuber, 1997-Ohio-58.] … Brown, for relator. Pierre Grieselhuber, pro se. __________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 5} We recognize that advertising assists the public in the selection of an attorney.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. Kelly

    132 Ohio St. 3d 292 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 20, 2012

    Disciplinary Counsel v. … O’CONNOR, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Akron Bar Assn. v. DiCato

    130 Ohio St. 3d 394 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 17, 2011

    V(6)(F). … Disciplinary Counsel v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Globe Indem Co. v. Wassman

    7 Ohio Law. Abs. 171 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1929

    Where the building is a school building erected by a board of education, the forwarding of a statement by a claimant to the clerk of the board is not a compliance with that section, even though the surety has knowledge of

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rankin-Thoman, Inc. v. Caldwell

    42 Ohio St. 2d 436 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1975

    In Zangerle v. Evatt (1942), 139 Ohio St. 563 , Fortner v. Thomas (1970), 22 Ohio St. 2d 13 , M. J. Kelley Co. v. Cleveland (1972), 32 Ohio St. 2d 150 , Burger Brewing Co. v. … Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Bender v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)

    2019 Ohio 2854 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 15, 2019

    Beck v. … Brown and Mark G. Kafantaris, for relator. Ronald J. O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Timothy A. Lecklider and Nick A.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • American Steamship Co. v. Limbach

    61 Ohio St. 3d 22 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1991

    This court defers to decisions of the board provided such decisions are reasonable and lawful. Highlights for Children, Inc. v. … Because it is both reasonable and lawful, the decision of the board is affirmed. Decision affirmed. *27 Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Wright and Resnick, JJ., concur. Douglas and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • State, Ex Rel. v. Bd. of Elec.

    138 Ohio St. 432 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1941

    After the selection of the clerk, the chairman shall be selected from the members of the board of opposite politics to that of the clerk * * *." Section 4785-11. … "The Secretary of State may summarily remove any member of a board of elections, or the clerk, deputy clerk, or any other employee of the board, for neglect of duty, malfeasance, misfeasance, or nonfeasance in office, for

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Select Sires, Inc. v. Lindley

    58 Ohio St. 2d 294 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1979

    “Agriculture” is not defined in the Revised Code; therefore, the board bottomed its decision in this matter on this court’s decision in Benken v. … Brown, Mahoney, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. Mahoney, J., of the Ninth Appellate District, sitting for Pi Brown, J.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Crane

    56 Ohio St. 3d 38 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1990

    We find respondent’s conduct to be a violation of DR 1-102(A)(4) and (5) and concur in the recommendation of the board. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re Timken Mercy Medical Center

    61 Ohio St. 3d 81 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1991

    As this court stated in Union Camp Corp. v. … Thus, in United States v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Novak

    110 Ohio St. 3d 134 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 9, 2006

    He did not reply to either letter. {¶ 13} For respondent’s failings with respect to Orrender, the board found him in violation of DR 1-104 and Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G). Count IV {¶ 14} Steven C. … V(4)(G), as found by the board. We further agree that the board’s recommended sanction, which implicitly incorporates a probationary period pursuant to Gov.Bar R.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ewing v. Lindley

    23 Ohio St. 3d 222 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 7, 1986

    Swetland, v. … For the reasons set forth herein, we affirm the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals. Decision affirmed. Celebrezze, C.J., Lqcher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • AT&T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. Beavercreek Township Board of Zoning Appeals

    87 Ohio St. 3d 559 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 19, 2000

    Bd. of Trustees v. Smyth (2000), 87 Ohio St.3d 549 , 721 N.E.2d 1057 . Moyer, C.J., Douglas, O’Donnell, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Lisotto

    94 Ohio St. 3d 213 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 30, 2002

    OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. LISOTTO. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Lisotto, 2002-Ohio-638.] … Gerald Ingram; Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter and Geoffrey Stern, for respondent. __________________ 3

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Curry v. Grand Valley Local Schools Board of Education

    61 Ohio St. 2d 314 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1980

    See State, ex rel. v. Crites (1891), 48 Ohio St. 460 ; State, ex rel. Maple, v. Hamilton (1912), 19 C. C. (N.S.) 229. The record of the mandamus action is void of any mention of a “continuing contract.” … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.