Case law

Spring Hill Nurseries Co. v. Lindley

5 Ohio St. 3d 54 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 18, 1983

Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals and remand the cause for consideration of those specifications of error which the board has not reviewed. Decision reversed and cause remanded. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., dissents.

In re Reinstatement of Fleck

29 Ohio St. 2d 82 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1972

Based upon the evidence before it, the board concluded that Charles Fleck has been rehabilitated and possesses the moral character required for admission to the practice of law. … J., Schneider, Herbert, Corrigan, Steen, Leach and Brown, JJ., concur.

General Motors Corp. v. Kosydar

37 Ohio St. 2d 138 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1974

I would reverse the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals in its entirety. Zinc Engravers v. … Apex Powder Corp. v.

Toledo City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. State Bd. of Edn. (Slip Opinion)

146 Ohio St. 3d 356 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 4, 2016

of Education, Dayton City School District Board of Education, and Cleveland Metropolitan School District Board of Education (“the boards”) that are created by the state to carry out the state’s governmental functions. … Durbin v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. King

74 Ohio St. 3d 612 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1996

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. KING. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. King, 1996-Ohio-238.] … The board adopted the panel’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation. __________________ Geoffrey Stern, Disciplinary Counsel, Lori J. Brown and Alvin E.

Sugarcreek Township v. City of Centerville

133 Ohio St. 3d 467 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 11, 2012

Brooks v. Ohio State Univ. (1996), 111 Ohio App.3d 342, 349, 676 N.E.2d 162.” State v. Lowe, 112 Ohio St.3d 507, 2007-Ohio-606, 861 N.E.2d 512, ¶ 9. … O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ Frost, Brown, Todd, L.L.C., Matthew C. Blickensderfer, and Scott D.

Plumbers & Steamfitters Local Union 83 v. Union Local School District Board of Education

86 Ohio St. 3d 318 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 8, 1999

Bush v. Spurlock (1989), 42 Ohio St.3d 77, 81 , 537 N.E.2d 641, 645 . … Malloy v. Westlake (1977), 52 *322 Ohio St.2d 103 , 6 O.O.3d 329 , 370 N.E.2d 457 ; Cincinnati v. Whitman (1975), 44 Ohio St.2d 58 , 73 O.O.2d 283 , 337 N.E.2d 773 , paragraph one of the syllabus; Zanesville v.

Verbanic v. Verbanic

1994 Ohio 297 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1994

After our ruling, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court ("board") ordered that Cregan submit to a psychiatric evaluation. Recently, in Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. … "Appellant also cites State v. Brown (Mar. 26, 1990), Mahoning App. No. 87 C.A. 145, unreported, 1990 WL 34744.

State ex rel. Cornerstone Developers, Ltd. v. Greene Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)

145 Ohio St. 3d 290 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 29, 2016

Wilen v. Kent, 144 Ohio St.3d 121, 2015-Ohio-3763, 41 N.E.3d 390, ¶ 11, quoting State ex rel. Cramer v. Brown, 7 Ohio St.3d 5, 6, 454 N.E.2d 1321 (1983). But this case does not fall under this rule. … LetOhioVote.org v.

State ex rel. Borders v. Jefferson Local School District

59 Ohio St. 2d 109 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1979

C. 3319.081 (A) * required that she receive a two year contract when she was employed as a playground aide for the remainder of 1976-77 school year since she had previously worked for the Board of Education of the Jefferson … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Loches and Holmes, JJ., concur. R.

State ex rel. Green v. Casey

51 Ohio St. 3d 83 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1990

Beck, v. … Saffold, v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Cox

96 Ohio St. 3d 47 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 3, 2002

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. COX. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Cox, 2002-Ohio-2989.] … Crabbe, Brown & James, Larry H. James and Christine L. Corl, for respondent. __________________ 3

State ex rel. Combs v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

62 Ohio St. 3d 378 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1992

Ohio Adm.Code 4121-3-16 provides: “(A) Form C-86 shall be used to present motions to the Bureau, Board or Commission. … Fellers, v. Indus.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cox

96 Ohio St. 3d 47 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 3, 2002

Crabbe, Brown & James, Larry H. James and Christine L. … The board adopted the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the panel. {¶ 9} On review of the record, we adopt the findings and conclusion of the board but not its recommendation.

Akron Bar Ass'n v. Parker

52 Ohio St. 3d 262 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1990

We agree that respondent committed the misconduct found by the board. However, our review of the record and the arguments submitted by the parties convinces us that a lesser penalty is warranted by this case. … Brown and Re snick, JJ., dissent. Richard H. Koehler, J., of the Twelfth Appellate District, sitting for Sweeney, J.

Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Porterfield

14 Ohio St. 2d 85 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1968

Chief Justice Marshall, in Brown v. Maryland (1827), 12 Wheat. 419 , 6 L. Ed. 678 . … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is reversed. Decision reversed. Matthias, O’Neill and Brown, JJ., concur. Taft, C. J., concurs in paragraphs one, two and three of the syllabus and in the judgment.

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Banks

28 Ohio St. 3d 125 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 24, 1986

Wherefore, this court accepts the recommendation of the board and hereby orders that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law in the state of Ohio for a period of one year. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Pavlik

89 Ohio St. 3d 458 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 16, 2000

See ABA Center for Professional Responsibility, Standards for Imposing Lawyer-Sanctions (1991 & Amend.1992); see, also, Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 316 , 720 N.E.2d 525 . … Bar Assn. v.

Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Lindley

56 Ohio St. 2d 303 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1978

Brown, J. The main issue presented by the instant cause is whether it was reasonable and lawful for the board to find that demurrage charges are excepted from use tax, pursuant to R. … Demurrage charges also serve “ ‘ to secure compensation for the use of the car * * v ” ICC v. Oregon Pacific Industries, Inc. (1975), 420 U. S. 184, 389 , citing Turner Lumber Co. v. Chicago M. & St. P. R.

Hilliard City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)

154 Ohio St. 3d 449 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 31, 2018

SLIP OPINION NO. 2018-OHIO-2046 HILLIARD CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLEE, v. FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES; UTSI FINANCE, INC., APPELLANT. … But “whether we might have weighed the evidence differently from the Board of Tax Appeals if we had been making the original determination” is immaterial. Jewel Cos., Inc. v.