Opinion

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Banks

28 Ohio St. 3d 125
28 Ohio B. 223
502 N.E.2d 1021
1986 Ohio LEXIS 809

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Dec 24, 1986
Status: Published
On the bench: Brown, Celebrezze, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by: 1 cases
Authority: More cited than 66.0%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon a full review of this matter, this court finds that the respondent has violated DR 1-102(A)(6), 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(3) and 3-101(B). Wherefore, this court accepts the recommendation of the board and hereby orders that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law in the state of Ohio for a period of one year.

It is further ordered that the respondent pay the costs of these proceedings.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.