Case law

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Wiechel

62 Ohio St. 3d 227 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1991

We agree that respondent violated DR 6-101(A)(3) as found by the board. We also concur in the board’s recommendation and hereby publicly reprimand respondent. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Alexander

133 Ohio St. 3d 232 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 9, 2012

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Alexander, 133 Ohio St.3d 232, 2012-Ohio-4575.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. ALEXANDER. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. … . {¶ 13} In Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Phillips

108 Ohio St. 3d 331 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 22, 2006

See, e.g., Disciplinary Counsel v. … Brown, First Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator. Murman & Associates and Michael E.

State Ex Rel. Gross v. Board of Directors of Miami Conservancy Dist.

141 Ohio St. 52 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1943

The Conservancy Court thereafter approved an official plan for. flood control, which had been duly adopted by the board of directors of the district, and appointed a board of appraisers which thereupon appraised approximately … appears to-the satisfaction of the court after having heard and determined all said exceptions that the estimated cost of constructing the improvement contemplated in the •official plan is less than the benefits appraised,v

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Dugan

113 Ohio St. 3d 370 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 16, 2007

Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter Co., L.P.A., Geoffrey Stern, Christopher J. Weber, and Rasheeda Z. Khan, for respondent. … Respondent alternatively proposed a public reprimand, which is the sanction the panel and board both recommended. {¶ 17} The parties have not filed objections to the board’s report, and we conclude that a public reprimand

Kirtland Country Club v. Lake County Board of Revision

68 Ohio St. 3d 476 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1994

Bd. of Revision v. … Here the BTA accepted the school board’s appraiser’s use of the cost approach to value and his appraised estimate of value. In R.R.Z. Assoc. v. Cuyahoga Cty.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Soucek

37 Ohio St. 3d 42 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 25, 1988

This court finds that respondent violated the Disciplinary Rules indicated by the board. However, we find the sanction recommended was not appropriate when compared to the misconduct committed. … Brown, JJ., concur. Wright, J., dissents.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Edwards

134 Ohio St. 3d 271 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 5, 2012

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Edwards, 134 Ohio St.3d 271, 2012-Ohio-5643.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. EDWARDS. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. … See, e.g., Disciplinary Counsel v.

State ex rel. Village of Chagrin Falls v. Geauga County Board of Commissioners

96 Ohio St. 3d 400 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 2, 2002

Chapter 2506 appeal from the board’s denial of its second annexation petition to raise its claims. See Heiney v. Sylvania Twp. … Willis v.

Cuyahoga Falls Education Ass'n v. Cuyahoga Falls City School District Board of Education

61 Ohio St. 3d 193 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1991

Brown, JJ., concur. Sweeney, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent. . … Rollins, v. Cleveland Hts.-University Hts. Bd. of Edn. (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 123 , 532 N.E.2d 1289 . .

Geauga County Bar Ass'n v. Psenicka

62 Ohio St. 3d 35 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 9, 1991

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Thus, we hereby publicly reprimand respondent for having violated DR 4-101(B)(2), 4-101(B)(3) and 5-105(A). Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Quality Ready Mix, Inc. v. Mamone

35 Ohio St. 3d 224 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1988

Liffiton, et al. v. … Brown, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., dissents.

Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Tzagournis

46 Ohio St. 2d 367 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1976

Beginning in 1972, Avith the case of Cleveland Bar Assn. v. … Brown, JJ., concur. Stephenson, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting for Stern, J. For a list of such cases see Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Vaporis (1976), 46 Ohio St. 2d 364 .

Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith

128 Ohio St. 3d 390 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 9, 2011

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith, 128 Ohio St.3d 390, 2011-Ohio-957.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. SMITH. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith, 128 Ohio St.3d 390, 2011-Ohio-957.] … Disciplinary Counsel v.

Toledo Bar Assn. v. Stahlbush

126 Ohio St. 3d 366 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 24, 2010

[Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Stahlbush, 126 Ohio St.3d 366, 2010-Ohio-3823.] TOLEDO BAR ASSOCIATION v. STAHLBUSH. [Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Stahlbush, 126 Ohio St.3d 366, 2010-Ohio-3823.] … Disciplinary Counsel v.

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Wood

32 Ohio St. 3d 166 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 26, 1987

Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Talbott (1979), 59 Ohio St. 2d 76 , 13 O.O. 3d 64, 391 N.E. 2d 1028 . … Brown, JJ., concur.

Columbus Bar Association v. Reed

145 Ohio St. 3d 464 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 8, 2016

V(4)(G) are codified in Gov.Bar R. V(9)(G). 140 Ohio St.3d CXIX. 2 The board’s report indicates that Reed owes Pierce $114.85. … Applicable precedent {¶ 13} To support its recommended sanction, the board cited Trumbull Cty. Bar Assn. v. Large, 134 Ohio St.3d 172, 2012-Ohio-5482, 980 N.E.2d 1021, and Toledo Bar Assn. v.

Board of Education of Ridgeville Township Rural School District v. Board of Education of Stryker Village School District

126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 575 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 24, 1933

by the board when such pupils attend a nearer- Jiigh school, *577 or in lieu of paying such tuition the board of education may pay for the transportation to the high school maintained by the board of the pupils living more … Sommers v. Putnam County Board of Education, 113 Ohio St., 177 , 148 N. E., 682 . Section 7747, General Code, specifies the method to be followed in computing such tuition.

State, Ex Rel. v. Commrs

123 Ohio St. 362 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1931

The board of county commissioners of Summit county, under favor of Section 6602-1 et seq. , General Code, created two sewer districts in said township, and later, for the purpose of supplying water to such sewer districts … by said board against the protests of the riparian millowners, where the only right which the city has in said river is that acquired from said riparian owners to take therefrom water sufficient for its own inhabitants?

Mobil Oil Corp. v. City of Rocky River

38 Ohio St. 2d 23 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1974

Sibarco Corp., v. City of Berea (1966), 7 Ohio St. 2d 85 , 218 N. … Brown, JJ., concur. CoRRIgan and P. Brown, JJ., concur in the judgment, There are various claims usually made when a litigant challenges the constitutionality of a zoning ordinance as applied.