Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.53s
State ex rel. Brubaker v. Hardy
5 Ohio St. 2d 103 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1966
Ford, v. Board of Edn. of City School Dist. of Cleveland, 141 Ohio St. 124 . Relator is not entitled to a writ of mandamus requiring the execution of a continuing contract of employment. Judgment reversed. Taet, C. … J., Zimmerman, O’Neill, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur. Matthias and Herbert, JJ., dissent.
Cited 10 timesPublishedCincinnati Bar Assn. v. Sershion
126 Ohio St. 3d 393 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 24, 2010
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Sershion, 126 Ohio St.3d 393, 2010-Ohio-3803.] CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. SERSHION ET AL. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. … VII(7)(H); and Cleveland Bar Assn. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState ex rel. Alford v. Willoughby Civil Service Commission
58 Ohio St. 2d 221 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 30, 1979
Stein, v. Dept. of Highways (1940), 136 Ohio St. 252 : State, ex rel. Lynch, v. Taylor (1940), 136 Ohio St. 417 ; State, ex rel. Baker, v. Wichert (1953), 159 Ohio St. 50 ; and State, ex rel. Stough, v. … Brown, JJ., concur in the first paragraph of the syllabus. P. Brown, J., dissents. Donobrio, J., of the Seventh Appellate District, sitting for Locher, J.
Overruled in part, on other grounds by State ex rel. Shine v. Garofalo, 69 Ohio St. 2d 253 (1982)Cited 98 timesPublishedDisciplinary Counsel v. Murraine
130 Ohio St. 3d 397 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 17, 2011
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Murraine, 130 Ohio St.3d 397, 2011-Ohio-5795.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MURRAINE. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. … O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ Jonathan E.
Cited 3 timesPublishedTrumbull County Bar Association v. Biviano
144 Ohio St. 3d 411 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 21, 2015
V(13)(C)(1), (2), (3), (4), and (5). {¶ 8} In support of the recommended sanction of a public reprimand, the board cites Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. … Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter Co., L.P.A., and Jonathan E. Coughlan, for respondent. _________________ 4
Cited 0 timesPublished13 Ohio St. 2d 147 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1968
In reaching onr decision we have not considered the finding by the board that respondent violated Canon 6. … J., Zimmebman, Matthias, O’Neill, Hebbebt, Schneideb and BrowN, JJ., concur.
Cited 2 timesPublished49 Ohio St. 2d 161 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1977
C. 5717.02 et seq., for appeals from any final'determinations of the Tax Commissioner-to the Board of Tax Appeals and from the decisions of- the board directly to this court. Torbet, supra, at pages 46-47. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Jocher, JJ., concur. ' A We note, however, that appellee did seek an order., restraining appellant from enforcing his judgment during the pendency of the action. Because we hold that R.
Cited 31 timesPublishedVillage of South Russell v. Budget Commission
12 Ohio St. 3d 126 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1984
Likewise, this court has acknowledged the board’s power of review relative to budget commissions’ refusals to allow collection of tax levies. Waite Hill v. Budget Comm., supra, and Wise v. Twinsburg, supra. … In conclusion, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is hereby reversed concerning the tax levy for the year 1979. Decision reversed. Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J.P.
Cited 6 timesPublishedOffice of Disciplinary Counsel v. Immelt
55 Ohio St. 3d 17 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1990
Having thoroughly reviewed the record in this case, we *18 concur in the board’s findings that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3), (4), and (5), and 9-102(B)(4). We also agree with the board’s recommendation. … Brown, JJ., concur. Resnick, J., dissents.
Cited 3 timesPublishedOffice of Disciplinary Counsel v. Curren
39 Ohio St. 3d 117 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 12, 1988
This court finds that respondent violated the Disciplinary Rules indicated by the board. Our review of the record, however, requires us to order a more severe sanction than that recommended by the board. … Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 2 timesPublished54 Ohio St. 2d 176 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 3, 1978
A case closely in point is Michael Todd Co. v. … Brown, Cole, Cock and Locher, JJ., concur. • Cole, J., of the.Third Appellate District, sitting for P. Brown, J. Cook, J., of the Eleventh Appellate District, sitting for Sweeney, J.
Cited 2 timesPublishedState v. American Dynamic Agency, Inc.
70 Ohio St. 2d 41 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 5, 1982
See, also, Carmelite Sisters, St Rita’s Home v. Bd. of Review (1969), 18 Ohio St. 2d 41, 46 ; Provident Bank v. Wood (1973), 36 Ohio St. 2d 101, 105-106 ; Board of Edn. v. … Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur. *46 Stephenson, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting for Celebrezze, C. J. Victor, J., of the Ninth Appellate District, sitting for W. Brown, J.
Cited 4 timesPublishedStark County Bar Ass'n v. Tscholl
57 Ohio St. 3d 211 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1991
Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the board’s finding of misconduct. We also agree with the board’s recommendation. Accordingly, we order that respondent be publicly reprimanded. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 3 timesPublished37 Ohio St. 3d 136 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1988
This court finds that respondent violated the Disciplinary Rules indicated by the board. We therefore adopt the board’s factual findings and its recommendation. … Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 1 timesPublishedKetchel v. Bainbridge Township
52 Ohio St. 3d 239 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1990
Brown v. Cleveland (1981), 66 Ohio St. 2d 93, 95 , 20 O.O. 3d 88, 89, 420 N.E. 2d 103, 105 . … Karches v. Cincinnati (1988), 38 Ohio St. 3d 12, 19 , 526 N.E. 2d 1350, 1357 ; Mayfield-Dorsh, Inc. v. South Euclid (1981), 68 Ohio St. 2d 156 , 22 O.O. 3d 388, 429 N.E. 2d 159 ; Brown, supra; Superior Uptown v.
Cited 28 timesPublishedDisciplinary Counsel v. Schnittke.
152 Ohio St. 3d 152 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 28, 2017
The board agreed, but in December 2016, we remanded the matter to the board for further proceedings— including the consideration of a more severe sanction. Disciplinary Counsel v. … V(13)(C)(1), (2), (4), and (5).
Cited 4 timesPublishedState ex rel. DeLong v. Industrial Commission
40 Ohio St. 3d 345 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1988
Comm. v. Dell (1922), 104 Ohio St. 389 , 135 N.E. 669 ; State, ex rel. Martin, v. Connor (1984), 9 Ohio St. 3d 213 , 9 OBR 523, 459 N.E. 2d 889 ; and State, ex rel. Weimer, v. Indus. … Brown, JJ., dissent.
Cited 9 timesPublishedGeauga County Bar Ass'n v. Haig
129 Ohio St. 3d 601 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 1, 2011
Bar Assn. v. Haig, 129 Ohio St.3d 601, 2011-Ohio-4271.] GEAUGA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. HAIG. [Cite as Geauga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Haig, 129 Ohio St.3d 601, 2011-Ohio-4271.] … The Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law adopted the panel’s recommendations. {¶ 8} On April 13, 2011, we gave Haig 20 days to show cause why we should not adopt the recommendations of the board.
Cited 6 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Board of Education v. Columbiana County Budget Comm.
140 Ohio St. 65 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1942
For its current operating expenses for the year 1942 the relator board of education submitted to the respondent budget commission a request for an allowance in the sum of $401,650.
Cited 2 timesPublishedState ex rel. LTV Steel Co. v. Oryshkewych
65 Ohio St. 3d 462 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1992
Cleveland Trust Co. v. Pethtel (1940), 137 Ohio St. 525 , 19 O.O. 240 , 30 N.E.2d 991 ; State ex rel. Caley v. … Brown, J., not participating.
Cited 6 timesPublished
Ask Donna