Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Immelt

55 Ohio St. 3d 17
562 N.E.2d 888
1990 Ohio LEXIS 1388

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Nov 7, 1990
Status: Published
On the bench: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by: 3 cases
Authority: More cited than 71.0%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record in this case, we *18 concur in the board’s findings that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3), (4), and (5), and 9-102(B)(4). We also agree with the board’s recommendation. Therefore, we order that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Respondent is further ordered to show complete restitution and adequate recovery upon any application he makes for readmission to the Ohio Bar. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Resnick, J., dissents.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.