Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

0.94s

  • Board of County Commissioners v. Northern Ohio Traction & Light Co.

    91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 437 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1915

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Halsey v. Board of Commissioners of Brooks Free Turnpike Road

    87 Ohio St. (N.S.) 473 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1912

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Industrial Commission v. Board of County Commissioners

    4 Ohio Law. Abs. 11 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 11, 1925

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Grant v. Joint Board of County Commissioners

    1 Ohio Law. Abs. 70 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 26, 1922

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Callahan

    36 Ohio St. 3d 179 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1988

    This court finds that respondent violated the aforementioned Disciplinary Rules indicated by the board. We also find the board's recommendation to be an appropriate sanction in this situation. … Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Prear

    68 Ohio St. 2d 42 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 10, 1981

    After an examination and review of the record in this cause, this court concurs with the findings of fact and recommendation of the board of commissioners. Gov. R. … V(7), that respondent be permanently disbarred from the practice of law. Judgment accordingly. Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Schwarz (Slip Opinion)

    160 Ohio St. 3d 194 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 22, 2020

    V(13)(B)(2) and (8). … {¶ 11} To support the recommended sanction, the parties and the board cited Disciplinary Counsel v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Columbus Bar Association v. Midian.

    154 Ohio St. 3d 135 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 27, 2018

    In support of that recommendation, the board notes that we have imposed public reprimands for similar misconduct involving clearly excessive fees in Columbus Bar Assn. v. … Bar Assn. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Barnhart v. Maxwell

    2 Ohio St. 2d 308 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1965

    In so doing, the board well may take into consideration that petitioner has attempted to escape. … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, HeRbebt, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Republic Steel Corp. v. Environmental Board of Review

    48 Ohio St. 2d 38 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1976

    Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. [1967], 11 Ohio. … -BROwn and P. Bbown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Graziano v. Board of Education of the Amherst Exempted Village School District

    32 Ohio St. 3d 289 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 2, 1987

    In Hale v. … Brown, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., concurs separately. Moyer, C. J., and Wright, J., concur in part and dissent in part. Locher, J., dissents.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Carpenter v. Limbach

    17 Ohio St. 3d 39 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1985

    In reviewing decisions of the board, this court has repeatedly stated that it is not a trier of fact de novo, but that it is confined to its statutorily delineated duties (R.C. 5717.04) of determining whether the board’s … The decision of the board being neither unreasonable nor unlawful is hereby affirmed. Decision affirmed. Celebrezze, C.J., O’Neill, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Thompson

    129 Ohio St. 3d 127 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 30, 2011

    [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Thompson, 129 Ohio St.3d 127, 2011-Ohio-3095.] CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. T HOMPSON. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. … BCGD Proc.Reg. 10(B)(2)(a), (c), (d) and (e). {¶ 7} Citing Columbus Bar Assn. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Medina County Bar Ass'n v. Kerek

    102 Ohio St. 3d 228 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 26, 2004

    Brown and Gary T. Mantkowski, for relator. Wayne L. … V(4)(G) (requiring an attorney’s cooperation in disciplinary proceedings). The board adopted these findings of misconduct. {¶ 6} The panel also considered the appropriate sanction for respondent’s misconduct.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Industrial Commission

    61 Ohio St. 3d 453 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 14, 1991

    Frank Brown & Sons, Inc., v. Indus. Comm. (1988), 37 Ohio St.3d 162 , 524 N.E.2d 482 , we found no specific safety violation where an employee did not follow his employer’s instructions and was injured as a result. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Markulin v. Ashtabula Cty. Bd. of Elections

    1992 Ohio 84 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1992

    Markulin v. Ashtabula County Board of Elections. [Cite as State ex rel. Markulin v. Ashtabula Cty. Bd. of Elections (1992), Ohio St.3d .] … . * * *" Clements v. Fashing (1982), 457 U.S. 957, 967-968, 102 S.Ct. 2836, 2846, 73 L.Ed.2d 508, 518-519. In State ex rel. Brown v. Summit Cty.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Miami Valley School v. Kinney

    69 Ohio St. 2d 134 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1982

    In Denison University v. … Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals. Decision affirmed. Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McMahon

    64 Ohio St. 3d 460 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 2, 1992

    We agree that respondent violated the Disciplinary Rules, as found by the board. We also concur with the board’s recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Browning v. Burt

    66 Ohio St. 3d 544 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1993

    See, generally, Lombard v. Good Samaritan Med. Ctr. (1982), 69 Ohio St.2d 471 , 23 O.O.3d 410 , 433 N.E.2d 162 , and Richardson v. … In Burgess v.

    Superseded by statute, as recognized in Couch v. DurraniCited 113 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Leon.

    155 Ohio St. 3d 582 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 20, 2018

    V(13)(C)(1), (4), and (5). {¶ 13} The board recommended that we impose a conditionally stayed six- month suspension for Leon’s misconduct. … Bar Assn. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.