Opinion

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Prear

  • 68 Ohio St. 2d 42
  • 22 Ohio Op. 3d 181
  • 428 N.E.2d 404
  • 1981 Ohio LEXIS 615
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Nov 10, 1981
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Celebrezze, Holmes, Krupansky, Locher, Sweeney
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

After an examination and review of the record in this cause, this court concurs with the findings of fact and recommendation of the board of commissioners. Gov. R. V(7) provides in part: “A person who has been suspended for an indefinite period from the practice of law and thereafter reinstated in the manner hereinafter provided shall be disbarred upon being found guilty of subsequent misconduct.” In view of respondent’s prior indefinite suspension, Dayton Bar Assn. v. Prear (1964), 175 Ohio St. 543 , and subsequent reinstatement, it is hereby ordered, pursuant to Gov. R. V(7), that respondent be permanently disbarred from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.