Case law

Board of Education v. Properties of the Akron Rural Cemetery

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 390 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1924

Railroad v. Belle Center, 48 Ohio St., 273 , approved and followed. 3. When power to make an appropriation is granted only in general terms, land exempt from appropriation cannot be taken under such general power. … A Board ofEd-ucation instituted proceedings under Section 7624, General Code, to appropriate part of the said land held by the cemetery corporation in excess of the 50 acre limitation.

State ex rel. Spencer v. Montgomery County Board of Elections

166 Ohio St. (N.S.) 147 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1957

State ex rel. Krauss v. Lucas County Liquor Licensing Board

93 Ohio St. (N.S.) 373 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1916

by the state board. … The petitions in these cases aver that appeals were taken to the state board, which affirmed the actions of the county board. .

Shaker Coventry Corp. v. Shaker Heights Board of Zoning Appeals

173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 572 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1962

D. T. & I. Ry. Co. v. Board of County Commissioners

4 Ohio Law. Abs. 177 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1925

State ex rel. Halpin v. Hamilton County Board of Elections

161 Ohio St. (N.S.) 281 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1954

State ex rel. Industrial Commission v. Board of County Commissioners

113 Ohio St. (N.S.) 711 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1925

The Court finds that said board of county commissioners of Fairfield county, Ohio, - duly issued the bonds as in the petition alleged and that there are overdue and unpaid the following installments of principal and interest

State ex rel. Hall v. Miami County Board of Education

131 Ohio St. (N.S.) 506 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1936

Disciplinary Counsel v. Simon

128 Ohio St. 3d 359 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 16, 2011

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Simon, 128 Ohio St.3d 359, 2011-Ohio-627.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. SIMON. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Simon, 128 Ohio St.3d 359, 2011-Ohio-627.] … Disciplinary Counsel v.

State ex rel. Ormet Corp. v. Burkhart

25 Ohio St. 3d 112 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1986

In Wells v. … Brown and Douglas, JJ., concur. Wright, J., concurs in part and dissents in part.

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Rion

27 Ohio St. 3d 40 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1986

V[9][b]), a certified copy of the judgment entry of conviction is conclusive evidence of the commission of that offense. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Bar Ass'n of Greater Cleveland v. Jaeger

22 Ohio St. 3d 39 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1986

VI(6) and V. We agree with the recommendation of the board that the appropriate sanction for respondent’s conduct is an indefinite suspension. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

United Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local Union No. 377 v. City of Youngstown

64 Ohio St. 2d 158 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1980

In Reed v. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Dowd, JJ., concur. Section 3 of Article XVIII does not limit “the powers of local self-government.”

State ex rel. Quolke v. Strongsville City School District Board of Education

142 Ohio St. 3d 509 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 25, 2015

Doner v. … Steckman v. Jackson, 70 Ohio St.3d 420, 639 N.E.2d 83 (1994), contradicts the board’s argument.

State ex rel. Wolson v. Kelly

6 Ohio St. 2d 67 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1966

Higgins, v. Brown, Secy. of State (1960), 170 Ohio St. 511 , 166 N. E. 2d 759 , where the candidate had inserted an improper voting residence and precinct in the declaration of candidacy. … Lemert, v. Board of Elections (1948), 149 Ohio St. 211 , 78 N. E. 2d 368 , the designation of the precinct *69 in the instant case was not a necessary element of the qualifications for the office.

Graziano v. Board of Education of the Amherst Exempted Village School District

32 Ohio St. 3d 289 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 2, 1987

In Hale v. … Brown, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., concurs separately. Moyer, C. J., and Wright, J., concur in part and dissent in part. Locher, J., dissents.

Barnhart v. Maxwell

2 Ohio St. 2d 308 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1965

In so doing, the board well may take into consideration that petitioner has attempted to escape. … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, HeRbebt, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Brenchweh v. Drake

31 Ohio St. (N.S.) 652 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1877

Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Lindley

8 Ohio St. 3d 35 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1983

It is well-established that, pursuant to R.C. 5717.04, our review is limited to a determination, based on the record, of the reasonableness and lawfulness of the Board of Tax Appeals’ decision. PPG Industries v. … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals being reasonable and lawful, the judgment of the court of appeals appealed from is reversed. Judgment reversed. W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Schwarz (Slip Opinion)

160 Ohio St. 3d 194 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 22, 2020

V(13)(B)(2) and (8). … {¶ 11} To support the recommended sanction, the parties and the board cited Disciplinary Counsel v.