Opinion

State ex rel. Industrial Commission v. Board of County Commissioners

  • 113 Ohio St. (N.S.) 711
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 15, 1925
Status
Published
On the bench
Allen, Day, Jones, Kinkade, Marshall, Matthias, Robinson
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

The defendants and each of them being in default for answer and demurrer to the petition, the Court finds the allegations in the petition confessed to be, and that they are in fact, true.

The Court finds that said board of county commissioners of Fairfield county, Ohio, - duly issued the bonds as in the petition alleged and that there are overdue and unpaid the following installments of principal and interest, viz:

Due Date

Principal

Interest

Total

Accrued Interest to Dec. 8, 1925.

Mar. 8, 1922 $1500.00 $1500.00 $281.00

Sept. 8, 1922 2000.00 $550.00 2550.00 414.38

Mar. 8, 1923 2000.00 500.00 2500.00 344.00

Sept. 8, 1923 2000.00 450.00 2450.00 275.63

Mar. 8, 1924 2000.00 400.00 2400.00 150.00

Sept. 8, 1924 2000.00 350.00 2350.00 146.88

*712 Mar. 8, 1925 2000.00 300.00 2300.00 115.86

Sept. 8, 1925 2000.00 250.00 2250.00 28.13

Total ______________$18300.00 $1755.88

Grand Total________________ $20,055.88

Wherefore a writ of mandamus is issued commanding said defendants forthwith:

First: To apply the unencumbered balance now in the county ditch fund to the payment of said indebtedness.

Second: If the balance in said county ditch fund be insufficient to pay said indebtedness in full, to apply so much of the unencumbered balance now in' the general fund of the county, as may be necessary to pay the balance of said indebtedness in full, together with interest on said amount at the rate of five per cent, per annum, from December 8, 1925, until the date of payment thereof.

■ Third: That said defendants, and each of them, shall file, within ten days from service hereof, a report of their proceedings hereunder, and, with respect to all other relief prayed for in said petition, this cause is continued for further order of the Court.

Writ allowed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.