Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

0.64s

  • WCI Steel, Inc. v. Testa

    129 Ohio St. 3d 256 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 7, 2011

    APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2005-V-1565. __________________ SYLLABUS OF THE COURT 1. … Brown at ¶ 14.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Meshel v. Keip

    66 Ohio St. 2d 379 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1981

    Heller, v. … Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., concurs in part and dissents in part. C. Brown, J., concurs in part and dissents in part. P. Brown, J., dissents.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Board of County Commissioners v. State Ex Rel. Clarke

    127 Ohio St. 341 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1933

    We do not allude to Section 486-17a, General Code, since that section relates to removals only; nor for the reasons heretofore assigned do we feel called upon to re-examine the case of Curtis, Safety Director, v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Mirlisena v. Hamilton County Board of Elections

    67 Ohio St. 3d 445 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1993

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Foster v. Cleveland Heights/University Heights Board of Education

    73 Ohio St. 3d 714 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1995

    The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Adamsky v. Buckeye Local School Dist. (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 360 , 653 N.E.2d 212 . *715 Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Bushnell v. Board of County Commissioners

    1 Ohio Law. Abs. 228 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1923

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education of Zaleski School District v. Boal

    104 Ohio St. (N.S.) 482 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1922

    between the person employed and one of the members of the board. … Slingluff v. Weaver, 66 Ohio St., 621 , and Scheu v. State, 83 Ohio St., 146 . For the reasons assigned the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and that of the common pleas affirmed. Judgment reversed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Christman v. County Board of Education

    115 Ohio St. (N.S.) 707 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1926

    It is ordered and adjudged that the demurrers to the petitions he overruled upon the reasoning and authority of the case of City of Youngstown v. … Wright as president of such board is ordered to sign vouchers for the salary of said Elmore L. Perry, as provided in the contract of the Hocking County Board of Education with said Elmore L. Perry. Writs allowed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of County Commissioners v. State ex rel. Primmer

    93 Ohio St. (N.S.) 42 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1915

    It is claimed, however, that there is no provision *45 here for compensation from the board of county commissioners, and failing to mention the same, though mentioning his allowance from the council in city cases, the presumption

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Frey v. Board of County Commissioners

    4 Ohio Law. Abs. 209 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1926

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hartzler v. Joint Board of County Commissioners & Champaign Counties

    4 Ohio Law. Abs. 223 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1926

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Epling

    15 Ohio St. 2d 23 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1968

    Respondent complains that the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline was prejudiced against him by reason of the fact that the board was aware of the former reprimand administered to him by this court. … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Collins

    48 Ohio St. 2d 233 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1976

    The decision of .the board is there-, fore affirmed, but since we see no need to remand the cause to' the Tax Commissioner, we sustain C.E.I.’s appeal and thus direct the Board of Tax Appeals to issue the appropriate order … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Communications Workers of America v. State Employment Relations Board

    38 Ohio St. 3d 602 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1988

    The specific question presented is whether the State Employment Relations Board’s dismissal of an unfair labor practice charge is a final order which may be appealed to the court of common pleas under R.C. 4117.13(D).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • M. J. Kelley Co. v. City of Cleveland

    32 Ohio St. 2d 150 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1972

    In Zangerle v. … Schneider, Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Leach and Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 118 timesPublished
  • Village of Willoughby Hills v. Board of Park Commrs.

    31 Ohio Law Rep. 116 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1965

    Van Nostran, J., of the Fifth Appellate District, sitting for Brown, J. 39183. McBennett, appellee v. Piskur, appellant. Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Lorain County. Brown, J. 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Roxy Musical Bar, Inc. v. Board of Liquor Control

    176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 415 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1964

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Galloway v. Board of County Commissioners

    174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 535 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 15, 1963

    Kahle, v. Rupert, Aud., 99 Ohio St., 17 ; Lynn v. Supple, Clerk, 166 Ohio St., 154 . “Official action” in the instant case would be the certification of the issue by the respondent to the board of elections.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Brenner v. County Board of Education

    97 Ohio St. (N.S.) 336 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1918

    L., 396, whenever 75 per cent, of the electors residing in the territory sought to be transferred, petition for such transfer, the county board of education is vested with no discretion in the premises, but is required under … the respondents to make such transfer is clear, it is ordered, considered, and adjudged by this court, that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue, as prayed for in relators’ petition, commanding the respondents, The County Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Graham v. Board of County Commissioners

    123 Ohio St. (N.S.) 362 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1931

    The board of county commissioners of Summit county, under favor of Section 6602-1 et seq., General Code, created two sewer districts in said township, and later, for the purpose of supplying water to such sewer districts, … by said board against the protests of the riparian millowners, where the only right which the city has in said river is that acquired from said riparian owners to take therefrom water sufficient for its own inhabitants?

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.