Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.64s
129 Ohio St. 3d 256 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 7, 2011
APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2005-V-1565. __________________ SYLLABUS OF THE COURT 1. … Brown at ¶ 14.
Cited 6 timesPublished66 Ohio St. 2d 379 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1981
Heller, v. … Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., concurs in part and dissents in part. C. Brown, J., concurs in part and dissents in part. P. Brown, J., dissents.
Cited 6 timesPublishedBoard of County Commissioners v. State Ex Rel. Clarke
127 Ohio St. 341 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1933
We do not allude to Section 486-17a, General Code, since that section relates to removals only; nor for the reasons heretofore assigned do we feel called upon to re-examine the case of Curtis, Safety Director, v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState ex rel. Mirlisena v. Hamilton County Board of Elections
67 Ohio St. 3d 445 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1993
Cited 3 timesPublishedFoster v. Cleveland Heights/University Heights Board of Education
73 Ohio St. 3d 714 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1995
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Adamsky v. Buckeye Local School Dist. (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 360 , 653 N.E.2d 212 . *715 Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState ex rel. Bushnell v. Board of County Commissioners
1 Ohio Law. Abs. 228 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1923
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education of Zaleski School District v. Boal
104 Ohio St. (N.S.) 482 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1922
between the person employed and one of the members of the board. … Slingluff v. Weaver, 66 Ohio St., 621 , and Scheu v. State, 83 Ohio St., 146 . For the reasons assigned the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and that of the common pleas affirmed. Judgment reversed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Christman v. County Board of Education
115 Ohio St. (N.S.) 707 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1926
It is ordered and adjudged that the demurrers to the petitions he overruled upon the reasoning and authority of the case of City of Youngstown v. … Wright as president of such board is ordered to sign vouchers for the salary of said Elmore L. Perry, as provided in the contract of the Hocking County Board of Education with said Elmore L. Perry. Writs allowed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of County Commissioners v. State ex rel. Primmer
93 Ohio St. (N.S.) 42 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1915
It is claimed, however, that there is no provision *45 here for compensation from the board of county commissioners, and failing to mention the same, though mentioning his allowance from the council in city cases, the presumption
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Frey v. Board of County Commissioners
4 Ohio Law. Abs. 209 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1926
Cited 0 timesPublishedHartzler v. Joint Board of County Commissioners & Champaign Counties
4 Ohio Law. Abs. 223 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1926
Cited 0 timesPublishedOhio State Bar Ass'n v. Epling
15 Ohio St. 2d 23 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1968
Respondent complains that the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline was prejudiced against him by reason of the fact that the board was aware of the former reprimand administered to him by this court. … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Collins
48 Ohio St. 2d 233 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1976
The decision of .the board is there-, fore affirmed, but since we see no need to remand the cause to' the Tax Commissioner, we sustain C.E.I.’s appeal and thus direct the Board of Tax Appeals to issue the appropriate order … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCommunications Workers of America v. State Employment Relations Board
38 Ohio St. 3d 602 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1988
The specific question presented is whether the State Employment Relations Board’s dismissal of an unfair labor practice charge is a final order which may be appealed to the court of common pleas under R.C. 4117.13(D).
Cited 1 timesPublishedM. J. Kelley Co. v. City of Cleveland
32 Ohio St. 2d 150 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1972
In Zangerle v. … Schneider, Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Leach and Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 118 timesPublishedVillage of Willoughby Hills v. Board of Park Commrs.
31 Ohio Law Rep. 116 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1965
Van Nostran, J., of the Fifth Appellate District, sitting for Brown, J. 39183. McBennett, appellee v. Piskur, appellant. Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Lorain County. Brown, J. 1.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRoxy Musical Bar, Inc. v. Board of Liquor Control
176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 415 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1964
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Galloway v. Board of County Commissioners
174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 535 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 15, 1963
Kahle, v. Rupert, Aud., 99 Ohio St., 17 ; Lynn v. Supple, Clerk, 166 Ohio St., 154 . “Official action” in the instant case would be the certification of the issue by the respondent to the board of elections.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Brenner v. County Board of Education
97 Ohio St. (N.S.) 336 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1918
L., 396, whenever 75 per cent, of the electors residing in the territory sought to be transferred, petition for such transfer, the county board of education is vested with no discretion in the premises, but is required under … the respondents to make such transfer is clear, it is ordered, considered, and adjudged by this court, that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue, as prayed for in relators’ petition, commanding the respondents, The County Board
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Graham v. Board of County Commissioners
123 Ohio St. (N.S.) 362 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1931
The board of county commissioners of Summit county, under favor of Section 6602-1 et seq., General Code, created two sewer districts in said township, and later, for the purpose of supplying water to such sewer districts, … by said board against the protests of the riparian millowners, where the only right which the city has in said river is that acquired from said riparian owners to take therefrom water sufficient for its own inhabitants?
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna