Opinion

State ex rel. Mirlisena v. Hamilton County Board of Elections

  • 67 Ohio St. 3d 445
  • 619 N.E.2d 1013
  • 1993 Ohio LEXIS 1844
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Sep 14, 1993
Status
Published
On the bench
Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 76.0%

The opinion

This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration of relator’s request for oral argument and the motion of Hamilton County Conservative Forum for leave to file brief amicus curiae,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the request for oral argument be, and the same is hereby, denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to file brief amicus curiae be, and the same is hereby, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that a writ be, and the same is hereby, denied, consistent with the opinion to follow.

Moyer, C.J., Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.