Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.25s
Richland County Board of Elections v. City of Mansfield
36 Ohio St. 2d 12 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1973
December 31, 1971, and the time, January 15, 1972, when, under the statute, council could reconsider the ordinance had not been reached on the cal *16 endar when White attempted to promulgate and file his second plan with the board … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. Corrigan, J., concurs in the judgment. Celebrezze, J., dissents.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrotherhood of Rooks v. Grandview Heights Board of Education
174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 27 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1962
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Hill v. Board of Fire Commissioners
26 Ohio St. (N.S.) 24 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1875
He appeared before the board and requested an investigation, and this was a waiver of notice in writing, and gave the board complete jurisdiction of the case in every respect. … Under these circumstances the board found the relator incompetent and discharged him.
Cited 0 timesPublishedVillage of Gates Mills v. Board of Park Commrs.
148 Ohio St. 7 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1947
Cited 0 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Horky v. Public Employees' Retirement Board
144 Ohio St. 344 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1945
The retirement board shall determine the amount and manner of payment of such contributions.” … -59, General Code, provides, in part: ‘ ‘ On and after January 1, 1939, any member, except a new member with less than five years of service, who has attained sixty years of age, may retire by filing with the retirement board
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Board of County Commrs. v. Austin
158 Ohio St. (N.S.) 476 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1953
the first branch of their demurrer, respondents rely on the provision of Section 5625-28, General Code, which recites that a taxing authority which is dissatisfied with an action of the budget commission may appeal to the Board … Here, before relator could have appealed to the Board of Tax Appeals, it would first have had to resort to an action in mandamus to procure the certificate on which its appeal to the board would be predicated.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCleveland & Mahoning Valley Ry. Co. v. Board of Commissioners
84 Ohio St. (N.S.) 492 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1911
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Loofbourrow v. Board of County Commrs.
167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 156 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 24, 1957
With that substitution, it is incumbent upon the Board of County Commissioners to ascertain the accuracy of the limits described, as it admittedly did here. … As to the remaining language of (D), requiring the Board of County Commissioners to find that the limits are “not unreasonably large or small,” and as to (I), the exercise of the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Belinky v. Board of County Commissioners
171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 6 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 18, 1960
There is no question that boards of county commissioners have, and under our present system of county government must *8 have, a wide discretion in the allocation of available funds to the various offices of the county. … But the discretion reposing in boards of county commissioners is not without limit. Certain duties are imposed upon them by legislative command and by the needs of a complex society.
Cited 0 timesPublishedVillage of Richmond Heights v. Board of County Commrs.
171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 449 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1961
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Freshwater v. County Board of Education
128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 123 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1934
Snapp, v. Goul, 97 Ohio St., 259 , and State, ex rel. Brenner, v. County Board of Education of Franklin County, 97 Ohio St., 336. Writ allowed. Weygandt, C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Bradley v. Board of County Commissioners
128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 181 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1934
Jewett, v. Sayre, Aud., 91 Ohio St., 85 , 109 N. E., 636 . … Board of Commissioners of Hamilton County v. Mighels, 7 Ohio St., 109 ; Buchanan Bridge Co. v. Campbell, 60 Ohio St., 406 , 54 N. E., 372 ; Board of County Commissioners of Clark County v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Deputy State Supervisors of Elections v. Johnson
65 Ohio St. (N.S.) 572 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1901
Cited 0 timesPublished61 Ohio St. 2d 62 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1980
.***” Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Stein (1972), 29 Ohio St. 2d 77, 81 . … Brown, Victor, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. Victor, J., of the Ninth Appellate District, sitting for P. Brown, J.
Cited 4 timesPublishedState ex rel. Ruff v. Public Employees Retirement Board
63 Ohio St. 3d 188 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1992
Retirement Bd., v. Baker (1959), 169 Ohio St. 499 , 9 O.O.2d 1 , 160 N.E.2d 262 , imposed the same requirement on the employer before the enactment of R.C. 145.483 in 1976. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFrederick Building Co. v. Board of Revision
5 Ohio St. 2d 220 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1966
The board refused to admit this testimony, and it was proffered by the appellants. The principal contention of the appellees is that the mandate in the case of State, ex rel. Park Investment Co., v. … Schneider and Brown, JJ., dissent.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Witsamen v. Maumee Valley Guidance Center, Inc.
6 Ohio St. 3d 26 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 13, 1983
Henderson, v. Civil Service Comm. (1980), 63 Ohio St. 2d 39, 41 [ 17 O.O.3d 24 ]; State, ex rel. Stough, v. Bd. of Edn., supra; State, ex rel. Bingham, v. Riley (1966), 6 Ohio St. 2d 263, 264 [ 35 O.O.2d 424 ]. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.
Cited 2 timesPublishedState ex rel. Osborn v. Fairfield County Board of Elections
65 Ohio St. 3d 194 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1992
Ferguson v. Brown (1962), 173 Ohio St. 317 , 319-320, 19 O.O.2d 227 , 228, 181 N.E.2d 890 , 893, overruled, State ex rel. Saffold v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 10 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Ford v. Board of Education of City School District
141 Ohio St. 124 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1943
By virtue of her certification and long employment by the respondent board, relatrix came within the first proviso of Section 7690-2, General Code. (State, ex rel. Bishop, v. Bd. of Edn. of Mt. … Orab Village School Dist., Brown County, 139 Ohio St., 427 , 40 N. E. [2d], 913.)
Cited 29 timesPublishedState ex rel. Mirlisena v. Hamilton County Board of Elections
67 Ohio St. 3d 445 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1993
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna