Case law

Sunset Square Ltd. v. Miami County Board of Revision

50 Ohio St. 3d 42 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1990

Park Investment Co., v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., dissents.

Dayton Supply & Tool Co. v. Montgomery County Board of Revision

111 Ohio St. 3d 367 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 29, 2006

Co. v. … Assn. v.

State ex rel. County Board of Education v. Board of Education of the Bloom Township Rural School District

104 Ohio St. (N.S.) 75 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1922

County v. … Snapp, v. Gout et al., Board of Education of Champaign Co. School District, 97 Ohio St., 259 .

Sun Oil Co. v. Lindley

56 Ohio St. 2d 313 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1978

E. 2d 14 ; Troy v. Board (1954), 160 Ohio St. 451 , 116 N. E. 2d 725 ; Division v. Board (1948), 149 Ohio St. 33 , 77 N. E. 2d 242 ; and Cincinnati College v. State (1850), 19 Ohio 110 . … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed. Decision affirmed. Leach, C. J., Herbert, Celebrezze, W. Brown and Sweeney, JJ., concur. P. Brown and Locher, JJ., dissent.

Vandercar, L.L.C. v. Port of Greater Cincinnati Dev. Auth.

176 Ohio St. 3d 472 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 23, 2024

Brown at 73. Because there was no statute creating liability in tort and there was no liability at common law, a board of education could not be held liable for a tort, as stated in Volk. Brown at 73. … Brown v.

Dinner Bell Meats, Inc. v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

70 Ohio St. 2d 103 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 26, 1982

Clearly, the school board, as a complainant before the board of revision, could lawfully have filed an appeal in the Board of Tax Appeals. May Dept. Stores v. … For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is hereby affirmed. Decision affirmed. W. Brown, Acting C. J., Reilly, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

State Ex Rel. Kilby v. Summit County Board of Elections

133 Ohio St. 3d 184 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 20, 2012

Minus v. Brown, 30 Ohio St.2d 75, 81, 283 N.E.2d 131 (1972). … Williams, v. Brown (1977), 52 Ohio St.2d 13, 19 [368 N.E.2d 838]; State, ex rel. Commrs. of the Sinking Fund, v. Brown (1957), 167 Ohio St. 71 [146 N.E.2d 287].” Jurcisin v. Cuyahoga Cty.

State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning County Board of Elections

72 Ohio St. 3d 69 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1995

Patton v. Meyers (1933), 127 Ohio St. 169 , 187 N.E. 241 (Secretary of State and boards of elections exercise quasi-judicial power when determining the sufficiency of referendum petitions). … Newell v. Brown (1954), 162 Ohio St. 147 , 54 O.O. 392 , 122 N.E.2d 105 , paragraph two of the syllabus; State ex rel. Fite v. Saddler (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 170, 172 , 580 N.E.2d 1065, 1066 .

State Ex Rel. Geauga County Board of Commissioners v. Milligan

100 Ohio St. 3d 366 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 31, 2003

Commrs. v. Milligan, 100 Ohio St.3d 366, 2003-Ohio-6608.] THE STATE EX REL. GEAUGA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ET AL. v. MILLIGAN, JUDGE. [Cite as State ex rel. Geauga Cty. … Ocasek v.

Meijer Stores Ltd. Partnership v. Franklin County Board of Revision

122 Ohio St. 3d 447 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 22, 2009

Church Residence v. Licking Cty. … Bd. of Revision (May 27, 2008), BTA No. 2006-V-751, affirmed, 122 Ohio St.3d 142, 2009-Ohio-2492, 909 N.E.2d 605, the school board did not appear, and the county presented no evidence to counter the appraisal and testimony

Butler v. Brown's heirs

5 Ohio St. 211 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1855

We are satisfied that Brown did not pay the purchase money. A majority of the court are of the opinion that the rule stated by the Supreme Court in the case of Manley v. … Brown’s heirs must do equity by bringing into court the purchase money, before they can demand the interposition of this court to quiet their title. It may become necessary to make Bissell a party to the suit.

Aeronca Manufacturing Corp. v. Board of Tax Appeals

6 Ohio St. 2d 87 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1966

Unquestionably a taxpayer does not intend (Section 5701.07, Revised Code, and Glidden Co. v. … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is, therefore, reversed and the cause is remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals with instructions to amend the assessment certificates in accordance with this opinion.

Butler v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.

171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 19 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 25, 1960

Federated Department Stores, Inc., v. Brown, 165 Ohio St., 521 , 138 N. … The order of the Board of Eeview (and the order of the Industrial Commission since the Industrial Commission refused an appeal to it) appealed from in the Brown case read as follows: “The board, after fully considering the

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rothermel

15 Ohio St. 3d 121 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1984

Inasmuch as respondent has filed no objections to the board’s recommendations, we agree that the appropriate sanction for respondent is a one-year suspension. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Toledo Bar Assn. v. Baker

122 Ohio St. 3d 45 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 28, 2009

Count V – The Brown Case {¶ 11} Doland Brown hired respondent in November 2005 to recover damages for injuries Brown sustained in an accident during February 2004. … Bar Assn. v.

Williams v. City of Akron

54 Ohio St. 2d 136 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1978

However, in Union Camp Corp. v. … Brown, P. Brown and Sweeney, JJ., concur.

In re Application of Brown

125 Ohio St. 3d 354 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 5, 2010

[Cite as In re Application of Brown, 125 Ohio St.3d 354, 2010-Ohio-1863.] IN RE APPLICATION OF BROWN. [Cite as In re Application of Brown, 125 Ohio St.3d 354, 2010-Ohio-1863.] … BROWN, C.J., not participating. __________________ Kevin David Brown, pro se. Tammy S.

Consolidation Coal Co. v. Kosydar

42 Ohio St. 2d 189 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1975

This equipment was held to be taxable by the Board of Tax Appeals. In Bailey v. … The board had jurisdiction over the entire assessment and we affirm its determination in this area. Decision affirmed. O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrbzze, W. Brown and P. Brown, J.J., concur.

Mantho v. Board of Liquor Control

162 Ohio St. (N.S.) 37 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1954

The decision in Drake et al., Trustees, v. Tucker, supra, has been approved and followed in many cases, including Cadwell v. Cadwell, 93 Ohio St., 23 , 112 N. E., 148 ; State, ex rel. Reamer, v. … E., 1009 ; Hedland v. Lones, Judge, 128 Ohio St., 68 , 190 N. E., 214 ; Sheets, Exr., v. Hodes, Admr., 142 Ohio St., 559, 564 , 53 N. E. (2d), 804; and Hagerman, Dir., v. City of Dayton, 147 Ohio St., 313, 325 , 71 N.

State Ex Rel. Board of Education v. Shafer

131 Ohio St. 233 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1936

State v. City of Okeechobee, 99 Fla., 617 , 127 So., 339 . … City of Okeechobee, supra; Keeney v. Kanawha County Court, 115 W. Va., 243 , 175 S. E., 60 ; Commonwealth, ex rel. Keller et al., County Commissioners, v.