Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rothermel

15 Ohio St. 3d 121
15 Ohio B. 272
472 N.E.2d 1072
1984 Ohio LEXIS 1275

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Dec 31, 1984
Status: Published
On the bench: Brown, Celebrezze, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney
Cited by: 8 cases
Authority: More cited than 86.3%

referring to a violation of R.C. 4505.19(C) as a fourth-degree felony

How later courts described this case

referring to a violation of R.C. 4505.19(C) as a fourth-degree felony

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Inasmuch as respondent has filed no objections to the board’s recommendations, we agree that the appropriate sanction for respondent is a one-year suspension.

Accordingly, we adopt the findings and recommendations of the board and hereby suspend respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.