Case law

Bailey v. Cheektowaga-Maryvale Union Free School District

District Court, W.D. New York · Jun 27, 2024

The second letter stated that “D’Angelo would be recommending [Bailey’s] termination to the Board of Education.” Id. … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)).

New York Life Insurance Company v. Oldham

District Court, W.D. New York · Feb 1, 2022

Robinson v. Concentra Health Servs., Inc., 781 F.3d 42, 44 (2d Cir. 2015) (quoting Brown v. Eli Lilly & Co., 654 F.3d 347, 358 (2d Cir. 2011)). … Brown, 654 F.3d at 358.

United States Ex Rel. Sanney v. Montanye

364 F. Supp. 905 · District Court, W.D. New York · Oct 9, 1973

See Jones v. State Board of Education of Tennessee, 397 U.S. 31, 34 , 90 S.Ct. 779 , 25 L.Ed.2d 27 (1970) (dissenting opinion); Honolulu Rapid Transit Co. v. … You argued and then you picked up the board and hit him how many times? A. Once. Q. You struck him once? A. Yes (Next portion inaudible.) 3 .

Sylvain v. Garland

District Court, W.D. New York · Sep 21, 2021

In Reno v. … V. v. Rosen, No. SA-21-CV- 0017-JKP, 2021 WL 243442, at *4 (W.D. Tex.

Hyatt Corp. v. Women's International Bowling Congress, Inc.

80 F. Supp. 2d 88 · District Court, W.D. New York · Aug 25, 1999

Dalton v. … Reservations for WIBC’s VIPs, Board of Directors and staff would be handled directly by WIBC and Hyatt. Id.

Dangelo v. John W. Danforth Co.

192 F. 678 · District Court, W.D. New York · Dec 12, 1911

C.) 3 Red. 404; Oregon Round Lumber Co. v. Portland & Asiatic S. S. Co. (D. C.) 162 Fed. 912 ; Connolly v. Ross (D. … , on looking into the hatch at the lower end, that there was water half way up the width of her bottom timbers, placing the depth at six or seven inches. ' Nothing was done to withdraw the water, although the tug had on board

Rivas v. Garland

District Court, W.D. New York · Jan 12, 2022

Sol v. … [u]pon dismissal of an appeal by the Board of Immigration Appeals . . . .” Under 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(2), detention during the ninety-day “removal period” is mandatory. In the case of Zadvydas v.

Cross v. Connolly

District Court, W.D. New York · Feb 4, 2020

Syposs v. U.S., 181 F.R.D. 224, 226 (W.D.N.Y. 1998); See Weinstein v. University of Connecticut, No. 07 Civ. 3219, 2012 WL 3443340, at *2 (D. … Libaire v. Kaplan, 760 F. Supp.2d 288, 293-94 (E.D.N.Y. 2011). While the burden of demonstrating relevance is borne by the party seeking discovery, Quotron Sys., Inc. v.

Maurer v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, W.D. New York · May 30, 2025

Brown, Psy.D., also found there was insufficient evidence to determine whether Jay had a psychiatric impairment. Id. at 257. … Tzetzo and Brown). So no medical provider’s opinion supported the ALJ’s conclusions which apparently came from the raw medical data in a way that this Court cannot follow. Michael A. v. Comm’r of Soc.

Toutounjian v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

2 F. Supp. 2d 374 · District Court, W.D. New York · Apr 17, 1998

Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus with this court on May 1,1996, after both an immigration judge and the Board of Immigration of Appeals (“BIA”) concluded that petitioner was excludable from the United … The INS notes that in Boudin v.

United States v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp.

748 F. Supp. 67 · District Court, W.D. New York · Oct 2, 1990

Lemon v. … In support of its argument, OCC cites Browning-Ferris Industries v.

Steve Marchionda & Associates v. Weyerhauser Co.

11 F. Supp. 2d 268 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jul 13, 1998

See Counter v. … Co. of America v. Dorinco Reinsurance Co., 917 F.2d 100, 104 (2d Cir.1990).

United States v. Fago

162 F. Supp. 125 · District Court, W.D. New York · May 14, 1958

Cushman v. Wood, D.C., 149 F.Supp. 644 . The term willfully has been interpreted to mean many things. It is used to characterize purpose or motive as distinguished from knowledge and intention. Kellems v. U. … United States v. Murdock, 290 U.S. 389 , 54 S.Ct. 223 , 78 L.Ed. 381 ; Spies v. U. S., 317 U.S. 492 , 63 S.Ct. 364 , 87 L.Ed. 418 . In Wilson v. U.

DS v. Rochester City School District

District Court, W.D. New York · Nov 30, 2020

“School districts and boards of education are considered municipal entities that can be sued under § 1983.” Martinetti v. Mangan, No. 17-cv-5484 (KMK), 2019 WL 1255955, at *7 (S.D.N.Y. … Doe v. E.

Robinson v. United States

330 F. Supp. 2d 261 · District Court, W.D. New York · Aug 9, 2004

He was certified in 1988 by the American Board of Psychiatry [sic] and Neurology. … .”); Lolik v. Big v.

Gayot v. Wyoming County

District Court, W.D. New York · May 16, 2025

Robinson v. Concentra Health Servs., Inc., 781 F.3d 42, 44 (2d Cir. 2015) (quoting Brown v. Eli Lilly & Co., 654 F.3d 347, 358 (2d Cir. 2011)). … Brown, 654 F.3d at 358.

Smith v. Baugh

District Court, W.D. New York · Apr 4, 2023

In particular, Defendants rely on Ferrer v. Racette, 2017 WL 1750377 (N.D.N.Y. … See, e.g., Dodson v.

Hassoun v. Searls

District Court, W.D. New York · Jun 26, 2020

See Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 121 (2d Cir. 2006); United States v. Amodeo, 44 F.3d 141, 146 (2d Cir. 1995). … Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 47 (2d Cir. 2019). Neither party has provided sufficient information to the Court to meet this standard.

Tolbert v. Rochester City School District

District Court, W.D. New York · Mar 26, 2020

Courts in this Circuit have found that meeting minutes of local boards and administrative bodies generally qualify as public records. Croci v. Town of Haverstraw, 175 F. … Though the Board of Education did not approve the recommendation, the Superintendent retained exclusive rights to grant tenure.

Jones v. Amalgamated Burlesque Enterprise, Inc.

285 F. 420 · District Court, W.D. New York · Sep 2, 1922

In King v. Townshend, 141 N. Y. 358 , 36 N. … It is true that in Railroad Co. v. Durant, 95 U. S. 576 , 24 L.