Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysupct

10,000+ results

0.34s

  • 260 Fifth Avenue Corp. v. Scychel

    182 Misc. 189 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1943

    It is alleged that these agreements, presumably oral, were based upon and included the terms and provision of certain written master collective bargaining agreements executed between the defendants Realty Advisory Board bn … (Bowles v. Cross & Brown Co., Sup. Ct., New York County, N. Y. L. J.,Mar. 31, 1943, p. 1248, col. 2; Bailey v. Karolyna Co., Ltd., 50 F. Supp. 142 ; Wolf v. Bell, 180 Misc. 587 ; Walsh v. 515 Madison Ave.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Egan v. Board of Education of the City of New York

    68 Misc. 347 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1910

    Lax v. Fourteenth Street Store, 49 Misc. Rep. 627 ; Weinstein v. Douglas, 51 id. 559; Neustaedter v. Weiner, 108 N. Y. Supp. 650 . Present: Seabury, Guv and Bijur, JJ.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Nugent v. Board of Police Commissioners

    34 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 261 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1882

    (Smith v. The Mayor, 37 N. Y., 518 ; Dolan v. The Mayor , 68 id., 274; McVeany v. The Mayor , 80 id., 185; Wood v. The Mayor , 12 J. & S., 325; People ex rel. Ryan v. French, 24 Hun, 263 .) … Ryan v. The Board of Police (MSS. opinion of the Court of Appeals, per Danforth, J., April 11, 1882), decided since the foregoing was written.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Haneman v. Board of Tax Commissioners

    17 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 255 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1877

    The first* and the most notable of these cases is that of Brown v. State of Maryland ( 12 Wheat., 419 ); but the tax or impost in that case was, in terms, laid upon the business of the importer of foreign merchandise. … The case of Low v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • New York City Transit Authority v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board

    196 Misc. 2d 532 · New York Supreme Court · May 8, 2003

    In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner New York City Transit Authority (Transit Authority) seeks an order and judgment annulling a determination of the respondent New York State Public Employment Relations Board ( … School Dist. v Public Empl. Relations Bd., 83 NY2d 315, 320 [1994]; Matter of Rosen v Public Empl. Relations Bd., 72 NY2d 42, 47-48 [1988]).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sztejn v. J. Henry Schroder Banking Corp.

    177 Misc. 719 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1941

    Sherburne Co., 193 id. 849; Bank of New York & Trust Co. v. Atterbury Bros., Inc., 226 id. 117; affd., 253 N. Y. 569 ; Brown v. Rosenstein Co., 120 Misc. 787 ; affd., 208 App. Div. 799 ; Bank of Taiwan v. … (Bank of New York & Trust Co. v. Atterbury Bros., Inc., supra; Brown v. Rosenstein Co., supra.) However, in the instant action Schroder has received notice of Transea’s active fraud before it accepted or paid the draft.

    Cited 68 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. New York State Labor Relations Board v. Westchester Movers, Inc.

    14 Misc. 2d 1052 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1958

    Ditomasso v. Loverro, 242 App. Div. 190 .) … (Hewlett v. Wood, 67 N. Y. 394, 399 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Campbell v. Wright

    8 N.Y. St. Rep. 471 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1887

    Brown, the agent of defendants. Indeed the entire business was done through Dawson and Brown. The counsel should have specified “the matter ” to the court. … Peck v, Valentine, 94 N. Y., 569 . The exclusion of the question to the witness Brown as-to the excitement and condition of the Chicago market. ' was proper.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Seinfeld ex rel. American Express Co. v. Robinson

    172 Misc. 2d 159 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1997

    (Brown v Stackler, 612 F2d 1057 [7th Cir 1980].) … (Brown v Stackler, supra, at 1059.)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Whibco, Inc. v. Village of Round Lake

    149 Misc. 2d 415 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1991

    Brown, J. The petitioner prays for a judgment annulling Local Laws, 1990, No. 1 as enacted by the Village of Round Lake by its Board of Trustees. … offered for sale except in connection with a public work on the property or the removal of silt or other recently accumulated material that blocks a normal flow of a water course without the special approval of the village’s Board

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Farmers & Mechanics' Bank v. Griffith

    5 Hill & Den. 476 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1843

    It must be conceded that some of the cases in this court go far to sustain the objection urged against the competency of Hoyt; particularly Baskins v. Wilson, (6 Cowen, 471,) which was founded upon Herrick v. … Rep. 24 ,) and Shaver v. Ehle, (16 id. 201.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Central Queens Allied Civic Council, Inc. v. Board of Standards & Appeals

    208 Misc. 809 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 24, 1955

    were deprived of a full opportunity to be heard; that the board had no power to limit the right to be heard on objections to property owners within a radius of 500 feet of the subject property; that the board was guilty … Church v. Walsh, 244 N. Y. 280, 287 .) The petitioners having failed to show that the respondent board abused its discretion in granting the variance, the determination must be sustained.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment

    112 Misc. 2d 422 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1982

    (See People v Sugden, 35 NY2d 453 ; Salathiel v State of New York, 96 Misc 2d 72 .) … Although such inquiry was allowed *427 in Blooming Grove Props, v Board of Assessors of Town of Blooming Grove ( 34 AD2d 953 ), the inquiry there was substantially similar to a demand for an admission of the rate that is

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Pierce v. Schenck

    3 Hill & Den. 28 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1842

    (Story on Bailm. § 439 ; Buffum v. Merry, 3 Mason, 478 ; Holbrook v. Armstrong, 3 Fairf. 31—34 ; Dearborn v. Turner, 4 Shepl. 17 ; Ewing v. French, 1 Blackf. 353, 355 , & Note (2) ; Hurd v. … The case of Smith v. Clark , (21 Wend, 84,) considers Seymour v. Brown, (19 John. R. 44,) as overruled.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. East River Terminal Railway v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

    79 Misc. 134 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1913

    United Gas Co. v. Priest, 152 App. Div. 249 ; People ex rel. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co. v. Priest, 206 N. Y. 274 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Franklin v. Mandeville

    57 Misc. 2d 1072 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1968

    Diluting the weight of votes because of place of residence impairs basic constitutional rights under the Fourteenth Amendment just as much as invidious discriminations based upon factors such as race, Brown v. … Board of Education, 347 U. S. 483 , or economic status, Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U. S. 12 , Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • General Realty Associates of 12th Street v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board

    125 Misc. 2d 173 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1984

    (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 .) … While regrettable, and unfortunate, the Board has no legal obligation to warn a landlord that a decision is soon to be made.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Kaufman v. M. T. Davidson Co.

    191 Misc. 545 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1947

    [a], [c], [e]; Employers Group case, supra; Baltimore Transit Co. v. Flynn, 50 F. Supp. 382 ; May Department Stores Co. v. Brown, 60 F. Supp. 735 ). Therefore, the plaintiff may not maintain the third cause of action. … Further, if the plaintiff had any cause for complaint for failure to comply with- the directives, application should have been made to the board for redress (Sanco Piece Dye Works, Inc., v. Herrick, 33 F. Supp. 80 ).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sypek v. Sypek

    130 Misc. 2d 796 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1986

    To the extent that any New York case law exists on the subject, it does not uphold his position (Brown v Brown, 122 Misc 2d 849 ; see also, In re Bramson [Bramson], 83 Ill App 3d 657, 404 NE2d 469 , wherein sporadic cohabitation … Here, the wife is not receiving "double support that is, second support from anyone with whom she shares bed and board” (Krawczuk v Krawczuk, 49 AD2d 1003 ), in the context of a new economic unit (see generally, Gallet, Former

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lorillard v. Town of Monroe

    12 Barb. 161 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 6, 1851

    In the case of Bounders v. … Morse, Bartulo and Brown, Justices.]

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.