Opinion

Egan v. Board of Education of the City of New York

  • 68 Misc. 347
Court
New York Supreme Court
Filed
Jul 15, 1910
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 25.4%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

The attorneys for the respective parties herein, after issue was joined by the filing of verified pleadings, signed a stipulation embodying a so-called “ statement of facts ” and submitted the case thus made to the court below* for decision, and from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff the defendant appeals.

The court below was wholly without jurisdiction to render judgment under such circumstances. Section 241 of the Municipal Court Act provides for a submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts; but such statement must be accompanied by an affidavit of one or more of the parties showing that such controversy is a real one, and no such affidavit is furnished in the case at bar. Lax v. Fourteenth Street Store, 49 Misc. Rep. 627 ; Weinstein v. Douglas, 51 id. 559; Neustaedter v. Weiner, 108 N. Y. Supp. 650 .

Present: Seabury, Guv and Bijur, JJ.

Judgment reversed, without costs, and new trial ordered.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.