Case law

Brown v. Hermann

14 Abb. Pr. 394 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1862

Schrank v. Brown

194 Misc. 138 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1949

Brown, 192 Misc. 603 ). … Brown, 203 N. Y. 136, 143 ; Matter of Newton v. Lewis, 118 Misc. 382, 389 ).

Brown v. Passidomo

127 Misc. 2d 700 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1985

(People v Anonymous, 99 Misc 2d 537, 539 [Crim Ct, NY County 1979], citing Bellacosa, Practice Commentary, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 11 A, CPL 160.60.) … Section 296 (16) is only part of a comprehensive legislative scheme which also includes CPL 160.50 and 160.60 (Matter of Hynes v Karassik, 47 NY2d 659, 663, n 3 [1979]).

Brown v. Duane

14 N.Y.S. 450 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1891

that, in view of such cessation, he desires to'be appointed to another position. 2iow, it has been determined in McGuire v. … Thomas v. Protective Union, 121 N. Y. 45 , 24 N. E. Rep. 24.

Brown v. McIntyre

43 Barb. 344 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1864

This principle is fully sustained in the following English cases: Austin v. Debnam, 3 Barn. & Cress. 139; Dronefield v. Archer, 5 Barn. & A. 313; 7 Eng. Com. Law. 177; De Medina v. … (Sommer v. Wilt, 4 Serg. & R. 19.) And for a maliciously excessive distress made by the defendant. (O’Donnell v. Seybert, 13 id. 54.)

People v. Brown

143 Misc. 2d 325 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1989

(People v Brown, supra, at 518 , analyzing People v Del Vermo, supra, at 483.) … (People v Brown, supra, at 518-519 , interpreting People v Caviness, supra, at 231 .)

People v. Brown

80 Misc. 2d 777 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1975

The barber shop warrants, it is claimed, were based upon probable cause acquired from the communications of coconspirators to which, the People theorize, the defendant Brown cannot object in view of Alderman v. … (Cf., e.g., People v. Gnozzo, 31 N Y 2d 134; People v. Feinlowitz, 29 N Y 2d 176.)

Brown v. Mayor

55 How. Pr. 8 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1877

William v. Brown

5 Cow. 281 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1826

Brown v. Austen

35 Barb. 341 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1861

Lloyd v. … In Murray v.

Brown v. Heacock

9 How. Pr. 345 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1854

Brown v. Clark

30 N.Y.S. 801 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1894

Waggoner v. Brown

8 How. Pr. 212 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1853

Brown v. Tuttle

66 Barb. 169 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1869

This principle was settled in Bennett v. Judson, (21 N. Y. 238 .)

Brown v. Bement & Strong

8 Johns. 96 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1811

of the title to the goods in question, with a condition of defeasance, on the payment of 210 dollars and 35 cents, in 14 days» This was a mortgage, not a technical pledge; and all that was said in the case of Cortelyou v. … The distinction between a pledge and a mortgage of goods xvas recognised by this court in Barrow v. Paxton. *98 (5 Johns. Rep. 258.)

Ostrander v. Brown & Stafford

15 Johns. 39 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1818

The weight of evidence clearly shows that neither of them were on board the sloop. Admitting, then, that the wharf was the place of delivery, a mere landing the goods on the wharf was no delivery. … He had notice that Stafford and Brown were the owners ; and if Mounsey and Olmstead would not take charge of the goods as consignees, he ought to have secured them on board his vessel, or in some other place of safety; and

People v. Brown

159 Misc. 2d 11 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1993

The victim was informed by Bernard Brown that Victor Iadarola was in the business of making loans to people. The victim was introduced to Victor Iadarola through Bernard Brown. … If a crime is continuous, then only one trial is permitted for the several different acts constituting the crime (In re Snow, 120 US 274 ; Brown v Ohio, 432 US 161 ; Matter of Johnson v Morgenthau, 69 NY2d 148 ). 5.

People v. Brown

179 Misc. 2d 279 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1998

That indictment contained 52 counts against Andrew Brown. … (People v Cox, 286 NY 137, 141 [1941].)

Brown & Hotchkiss v. Cook

9 Johns. 361 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1812

Brown v. Aplin

1 Cow. 203 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1823

United States v. Hanford & Ely, ( 19 John. 173 .) Where the capias was amended, though wrongly tested in the name of the former Ch. Justice.