Opinion

Waggoner v. Brown

  • 8 How. Pr. 212
Court
New York Supreme Court
Filed
Jul 1, 1853
Status
Published
Author
Johnson
On the bench
Johnson
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 53.3%

The opinion

Johnson, Justice.

The complaint was not properly verified. The wor d substantially ” in the connexion in which it stands in the verification is a qualifying term, and imports, that the facts stated in the complaint are mainly, but may not be entirely, true. To which of the essential facts stated in the complaint, or to what part of any of them, or precisely to what extent, the qualification was designed to extend, cannot be seen. The statute as to every thing material should be strictly followed and parties not be permitted to evade it, by qualifications or reservations of any kind. The complaint served with tiie summons not having been properly verified, the defendants were *213 at liberty to put in their answer without verification. They were not bound under such circumstances by the verification at all. The plaintiff’s attorney was therefore in error in returning the answer and entering his judgment as though none had been put in.

Judgment set aside with ten dollars costs of motion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.