Opinion

Brown v. Heacock

  • 9 How. Pr. 345
Court
New York Supreme Court
Filed
Jan 15, 1854
Status
Published
Author
Shankland
On the bench
Shankland
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 53.3%

The opinion

By the Court—Shankland, Justice.

This motion can not be sustained. Whether a case or exceptions were made and served in time, or not, affects not the regularity of the appeal. The appellant may appeal from a judgment whether he makes a case or exceptions, or not. He may on such appeal reverse the judgment for causes appearing on the face of the record; *346 as, for instance, that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. (Code, § 148.)

The appeal, in this case, was regular, according to the pro visions of the Code, §§ 327, 332.

If the defendant has failed to make and serve/his case in season, or if he has failed to file it with the clerk within the time prescribed by rule 17, he is deemed to have abandoned it, and must either discontinue his appeal or go to argument on the judgment record alone. But the appeal is not lost by reason of the loss of his case or exceptions.

It is unnecessary to the decision of this motion to examine whether the case was deposited in the post-office at Buffalo in twenty days after service of the notice of judgment. If the defendant shall need relief, on account of laches, he must move for it, so that the plaintiff can meet the application by opposing affidavits, if he shall be so advised. This motion to dismiss the appeal is denied with ten dollars costs.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.