Case law

Barlas v. United States

279 F. Supp. 2d 201 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 18, 2003

Brown v. OMI Corp., 863 F.Supp. 169, 170 (S.D.N.Y.1994). Further, “the rule of comparative negligence applies,” Jones v. Spentonbush-Red Star Co., 155 F.3d 587, 596 (2d Cir.1998); 2 Martin J. … Defectively packaged stores are not foreign agents—they are essential items taken on board as part of the “adventure” to sustain the ship’s crew. See Peterson v.

The Antoinetta C.

1 F. Cas. 1057 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 15, 1872

There was on board both bleaching powder and soda ash, in casks. Some of the casks of bleaching powder were stowed against the skin of the ship,. without any dunnage. … The Reeside, Case No. 11,657; Bearse v. Ropes, Id. 1,192. There must be a decree for the libellants. with costs, with a reference to a commissioner to ascertain the damages.

Bell v. Oswald

305 F. Supp. 878 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 18, 1969

See Hyser v. Reed, 115 U.S.App.D.C. 254 , 318 F.2d 225 (1963), cert. denied sub nom. Thompson v. United States Bd. of Parole, 375 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 446 , 11 L.Ed.2d 315 (1963); Lewis v. … As such, this court may not review the Parole Board’s determination nor require that the Board hold a full evidentiary hearing. Briguglio v. New York State Bd. of Parole, supra.

Pharmaceutical Society of the State of New York, Inc. v. Lefkowitz

454 F. Supp. 1175 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 22, 1978

See Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., 425 U.S. 748 , 96 5. Ct. 1817, 48 L.Ed.2d 346 (1976). … V.

C & a Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown

770 F. Supp. 848 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 11, 1991

Most recently, in Dennis v. … See Pike v.

United Tech. Com. v. Intern. Broth. of Elec. Wkrs.

597 F. Supp. 265 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 8, 1984

See NLRB v. … Compare, NLRB v.

Jalal v. Columbia University in the City of New York

4 F. Supp. 2d 224 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 9, 1998

See Brown v. … In Stern v.

Thain v. The North America

23 F. Cas. 881 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 15, 1842

That the vessel of the libellant, at anchor off Castle Garden, had no watch on deck at the time, and no light exhibited in the rigging, and none within view on deck, and she was not seen on board the steamboat until the boat … Lack v. Seward, 4 Car. & P. 106; Handaysyde v. Wilson, 3 Car. & P. 538.

Henderson v. United States

74 F. Supp. 343 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 1, 1947

They principally refer to decisions of the Maritime War Emergency Board. … Maritime War Emergency Board Decision 2B, Article V. A. Area Bonus.

In re Autler

23 F. Supp. 756 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 8, 1938

Libby v. Hopkins, 104 U.S. 303 , 26 L.Ed. 769 ; Western Tie & Timber Co. v. Brown, 196 U.S. 502 , 25 S.Ct. 339 , 49 L.Ed. 571 ; Alvord v. Ryan, 8 Cir., 212 F. 83 ; Morris v. … The dictum in Murray v.

McKenna v. Peekskill Housing Authority

573 F. Supp. 976 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 27, 1983

At the time this action was commenced, plaintiffs, Julianna McKenna (“McKenna”) and Alice Brown (“Brown”), were tenants in a housing project in Peekskill, N.Y. … The defendants, citing Galvan v.

Buckley v. Gibney

332 F. Supp. 790 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 22, 1971

The application to reopen the proceedings was directed to the Board as was at that point required by 8 CFR § 3.2 . On February 5, 1971, the Board filed an order denying this application. … Fong Yue Ting v. United States, 149 U.S. 698 , 730, 13 S.Ct. 1016 , 37 L.Ed. 905 (1892); Cortez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 395 F.2d 965, 967 (5th Cir. 1968); Burr v.

Fleming v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.

318 F. Supp. 194 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 10, 1970

O’Neil v. W. R. Grace & Company, 410 F.2d 908 (5th Cir. 1969). … Peters v. Lines, 275 F.2d 919, 930 (9th Cir. 1960); Dixon v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, 378 F.2d 392, 394 (3rd Cir. 1967).

Citywide Education Action Project v. Community Services Administration

497 F. Supp. 1239 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 19, 1980

Koch v. Yunich, 533 F.2d 80, 85 (2d Cir. 1976); Powell v. Workmen’s Compensation Board of the State of New York, 327 F.2d 131, 137 (2d Cir. 1964); Johnson v. County of Chester, 413 F.Supp. 1299, 1312 (E.D.Pa.1976). … proposed by the area policy boards.

United States ex rel. Belfrage v. Kenton

131 F. Supp. 576 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 1, 1955

The careful analysis of the evidence by that Board, as reflected in its opinion, shows that such an accusation is. without foundation. See Shaughnessy v. United States ex rel. … Volpe v.

Verdon v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

828 F. Supp. 1129 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 12, 1993

Minor disputes “[are] subject to compulsory and binding arbitration before the National Railroad Adjustment Board [ (“the NRAB”) ] ... or before an adjustment board [ (“another board”) ] established by the employer and the … Complaint at paragraph V. 8 .

Arthur v. Associated Musicians Greater New York, Local 802

278 F. Supp. 400 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 30, 1967

Plaintiffs’ argument rests on the recent decision of the National Labor Relations Board (N.L.R.B.) in American Federation of Musicians v. Glasser, et al., 165 N.L.R.B. 110 . … Vars v. International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, etc., 320 F.2d 576 (2d Cir. 1963). Here, no such determination has been made by the Labor Board.

Barrett v. The Arena Group Holdings, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York · May 23, 2024

Burch v. Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc., 551 F.3d 122, 126 (2d Cir. 2008). Leave to amend may be denied if “amendment would be futile.” Chunn v. Amtrak, 916 F.3d 204, 208 (2d Cir. 2019) (citing Tocker v. … Because there has not been any prior amendment, and given the “liberality in granting leave to amend,” the Court grants Plaintiff’s leave to amend his complaint, Brown v. Kelly, 244 F.R.D. 222, 227 (S.D.N.Y. 2007).

Collinsville Police Pension Board on behalf of the Collinsville Police Pension Fund v. Discovery, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 5, 2024

Id. ¶ 206; see also 2021 Board Materials, Dkt. 88-22, at 5. … The board meeting materials reflect that Discovery imposed the same limitations on its due diligence disclosures to WarnerMedia “for the same reasons.” 2021 Board Materials at 5.

Wilson v. Colvin

107 F. Supp. 3d 387 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 2, 2015

See, e.g., Brunson v. Callahan, No. 98-6229, 199 F.3d 1321 (table), 1999 WL 1012761 at *1 (2d Cir. Oct. 14, 1999); Brown v. Apfel, 174 F.3d at 62 . . See also, e.g., Prince v. … See also, e.g., Halloran v. Barnhart, 362 F.3d at 31 ; Jasinski v. Barnhart, 341 F.3d at 184 ; Veino v. Barnhart, 312 F.3d at 586 ; Shaw v. Chater, 221 F.3d at 131 ; Brown v. Apfel, 174 F.3d at 61 ; Perez v.