Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysd

10,000+ results

1.56s

  • Royal v. National Football League Management Council

    District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 20, 2020

    Litwin v. Blackstone Grp., L.P., 634 F.3d 706, 715 (2d Cir. 2011) (quoting Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)). … See Osberg v. Foot Locker, Inc., 555 F. App’x 77, 80 (2d Cir. 2014); see also Brown v. Rawlings Fin.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Haberman v. Murchison

    335 F. Supp. 286 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 14, 1971

    Newport Steel Corp., 193 F.2d 461, 463 (2 Cir. 1952) and Greenstein v. … (Phillips v. SEC, 388 F.2d at 972 ).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Goldstein v. Weisman

    185 F. Supp. 242 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 14, 1960

    In Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. … Y.1949, 92 F.Supp. 436, 438 ; Fielding v. Allen, 2 Cir., 1950, 181 F.2d 163, 168 , *249 certiorari denied, sub nom. Ogden Corp. v. Fielding, 1950, 340 U.S. 817 , 71 S.Ct. 46 , 95 L.Ed. 600 ; Fuller v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Belgian Mission for Economic Cooperation v. Zarati Steamship Co.

    90 F. Supp. 741 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 25, 1950

    Spreckels Sugar Co. v. South Atlantic Steamship Line, D.C.S.D.Ga.1944, 55 F. *742 Supp. 670 . The agency relationship must also exist at the time of service of process. Miller v. The Sultana & Browning S. S. … [See Bartholomew & Co. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Mastercard International Inc. v. Fédération Internationale De Football Ass'n

    464 F. Supp. 2d 246 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 7, 2006

    Valcke nevertheless presented to the FIFA Board a comparison of the “consideration” in the “Visa v. … Co. v.

    Reversed in part, on other grounds by Mastercard International Inc. v. Federation Internationale de Football Ass'n, 239 F. App'x 625 (2007)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Union Ferry Co. v. United States

    12 F. Supp. 284 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 24, 1935

    Neither the officer in charge of the Mohave’s navigation at the time, nor the quartermaster at the wheel, nor a lookout on duty on board the Mohave, were called to testify before the Board of Naval Inquiry, and their testimony … Royal Mail Steam Packet Co. v. Companhia De Navegacao Lloyd Brasileiro (D. C.) 50 F. (2d) 207.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Buchbinder v. Bowen

    709 F. Supp. 389 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 15, 1989

    Richardson, 402 U.S. at 401 , 91 S.Ct. at 1427 (quoting Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 216-17 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938)). … v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hui v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York

    District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 14, 2025

    Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 120 (2d Cir. 2006). 11. … Reserve Supervisory Information in open coutt, the Parties shall provide the Board with / reasonable advance notice in order to provide the Board with an opportunity to object or otherwise be heard with respect

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kierulff Associates v. Luria Brothers & Company

    240 F. Supp. 640 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 3, 1965

    Carolyn Chenilles, Inc. v. Ostow & Jacobs, Inc., 168 F.Supp. 894 (S.D.N.Y.1958); Jones v. RCA, 131 F.Supp. 82, 84 (S.D.N.Y. 1955). In Carolyn Chenilles, Inc. v. … (Lip-sett Dep. 3-4, 41) One member of the Board of Directors of Lipsett is also a member of the Luria Board and a Vice President of Luria.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Corporation of the Royal Exchange Assurance v. United States

    6 F. Supp. 689 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 8, 1934

    United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, 280 U. S. 320 , 50 S. Ct. 118 , 74 L. Ed. 451 . … Rice v. U. S., 122 U. S. 611 , 617, 7 S. Ct. 1377, 1381 , 30 L. Ed. 793 . And the question of the bar of the statute may properly be raised by exception to the libel. U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Doe v. First UNUM Life Insurance Company

    District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 29, 2025

    Peter Brown, M.D., board certified in psychiatry, to conduct a peer review and analyze whether the available medical records suggested restrictions and limitations that would … .”); Eugene S. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Roberts v. Knowlton

    377 F. Supp. 1381 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 8, 1974

    Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 476 F.2d 687, 692-693 (2d Cir. 1973); Checker Motors Corp. v. … White v. Knowlton, 361 F.Supp. 445 (S.D.N.Y.1973); Andrews v. Knowlton, 367. F.Supp. 1263 (S.D.N.Y.1973) (Knapp, J.).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. National Maritime Union of America

    196 F. Supp. 374 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 10, 1961

    United States v. National Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass’n, 2 Cir., 292 F.2d 190 . The restraining order of July 3, 1961 directed the defendants to show cause on. … The Board of Inquiry concluded that this proposed National Health, Safety and Military Cargo Clearance Board could not achieve these purposes and therefore should not be adopted.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Bernstein v. Mediobanca Banca di Credito Finanziario-Societa Per Azioni

    78 F.R.D. 1 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 9, 1978

    Papilsky v. Berndt, 466 F.2d 251, 258 (2d Cir. 1972); Certain-Teed Products Corporation v. Topping, 171 F.2d 241, 243 (2d Cir. 1948); Brendle v. Smith, 7 F.R.D. 119, 120 (S.D.N.Y.1946). … Abramson v. Pennwood Investment Corp., supra; see also Ruskay v. Waddell, supra; Stella v. Kaiser, 218 F.2d 64, 66-68 (2d Cir. 1954), cert, denied, 350 U.S. 835 , 76 S.Ct. 71 , 100 L.Ed. 745 (1955).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Six West Retail Acquisition, Inc. v. Sony Theatre Management Corp.

    203 F.R.D. 98 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 6, 2001

    For instance, in Thomas v. … Devlin, 2000 WL 28173 , at *4; see also Yaskawa Electric Corp. v. Kollmorgen Corp., No. 00 C 1757, 2001 WL 649532, at *2 (N.D. Ill. June 7, 2001); Buzzeo v. Board of Education, 178 F.R.D. 390, 393 (E.D.N.Y.1998).

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Towle v. The Great Eastern

    24 F. Cas. 75 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 12, 1864

    See also Hennessey v. The Versailles [Case No. 6,365]; Williamson v. The Alphonso [Id. 17,749]; Winso v. The Cornelius Grinnell [Id. 17.883]. In the case last cited, Mr. … Hope v. The Dido [Case No. 6,679]; Lea v. The Alexander [Id. 8,153]; Hoburt v. Drogan, 10 Pet. [35 U. S.] 108; Abb. Shipp, p. 560; note 1 of Story and Perkins; Marv.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re Henschel

    109 F. 861 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 22, 1901

    Thompson v. Burhans, 61 N. Y. 52, 63 ; Rogers v. Pell, 154 N. Y. 518, 529 , 49 N. E. 75 ; Montag v. Linn, 19 Ill. 399 ; People v. De Camp, 12 Hun, 378 , 379. Eight of the proxies allowed to vote for Mr. … Justice Brown in Re Wetmore (D. C.) 16 N. B. R. 514, 518 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Salsitz v. Peltz

    210 F.R.D. 95 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 17, 2002

    create a misrepresentation as to whether the Board of Directors favored the Dutch Auction, (id. at 1146). … See, e.g., Simon v. Eastern Ky.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Langston v. Levitt

    425 F. Supp. 642 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 7, 1977

    McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 420, 426 , 81 S.Ct. 1101 , 6 L.Ed.2d 393 (1961); Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Comm’rs, 330 U.S. 552, 564 , 67 5.Ct. 910, 91 L.Ed. 1093 (1947); Lindsley v. … Accord, August v. Bronstein, supra at 194; see Brown v. Supreme Court of Virginia, 359 F.Supp. 549, 546 (E.D.Va.) (three-judge court), aff’d mem., 414 U.S. 1034 , 94 S.Ct. 534 , 38 L.Ed.2d 327 (1973).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • DISTRICT 65, UAW v. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.

    576 F. Supp. 1468 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 30, 1983

    Utility Workers Union v. … Compare Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co., 713 F.2d 254, 260 (7th Cir.1983).

    Cited 57 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.