Case law

Haberman v. Murchison

335 F. Supp. 286 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 14, 1971

Newport Steel Corp., 193 F.2d 461, 463 (2 Cir. 1952) and Greenstein v. … (Phillips v. SEC, 388 F.2d at 972 ).

Goldstein v. Weisman

185 F. Supp. 242 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 14, 1960

In Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. … Y.1949, 92 F.Supp. 436, 438 ; Fielding v. Allen, 2 Cir., 1950, 181 F.2d 163, 168 , *249 certiorari denied, sub nom. Ogden Corp. v. Fielding, 1950, 340 U.S. 817 , 71 S.Ct. 46 , 95 L.Ed. 600 ; Fuller v.

Mastercard International Inc. v. Fédération Internationale De Football Ass'n

464 F. Supp. 2d 246 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 7, 2006

Valcke nevertheless presented to the FIFA Board a comparison of the “consideration” in the “Visa v. … Co. v.

Belgian Mission for Economic Cooperation v. Zarati Steamship Co.

90 F. Supp. 741 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 25, 1950

Spreckels Sugar Co. v. South Atlantic Steamship Line, D.C.S.D.Ga.1944, 55 F. *742 Supp. 670 . The agency relationship must also exist at the time of service of process. Miller v. The Sultana & Browning S. S. … [See Bartholomew & Co. v.

Union Ferry Co. v. United States

12 F. Supp. 284 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 24, 1935

Neither the officer in charge of the Mohave’s navigation at the time, nor the quartermaster at the wheel, nor a lookout on duty on board the Mohave, were called to testify before the Board of Naval Inquiry, and their testimony … Royal Mail Steam Packet Co. v. Companhia De Navegacao Lloyd Brasileiro (D. C.) 50 F. (2d) 207.

Hui v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York

District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 14, 2025

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 120 (2d Cir. 2006). 11. … Reserve Supervisory Information in open coutt, the Parties shall provide the Board with / reasonable advance notice in order to provide the Board with an opportunity to object or otherwise be heard with respect

Rothstein v. Civil Service Commission

498 F. Supp. 1124 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 8, 1980

After quoting extensively from Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972) and Boddie v. … Y.1979); Hammer v. Greenburgh, 440 F.Supp. 27, 29 (S.D.N.Y.1977); Morpurgo v. Board of Higher Education, 423 F.Supp. 704, 710 (S.D.N.Y.1976) (Weinfeld, J.).

Kierulff Associates v. Luria Brothers & Company

240 F. Supp. 640 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 3, 1965

Carolyn Chenilles, Inc. v. Ostow & Jacobs, Inc., 168 F.Supp. 894 (S.D.N.Y.1958); Jones v. RCA, 131 F.Supp. 82, 84 (S.D.N.Y. 1955). In Carolyn Chenilles, Inc. v. … (Lip-sett Dep. 3-4, 41) One member of the Board of Directors of Lipsett is also a member of the Luria Board and a Vice President of Luria.

Eber Bros. Wine & Liquor Corp. v. Firemen's Ins.

29 F. Supp. 772 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 11, 1939

Pullman Co. v. Jenkins, 305 U.S. 534 , 59 S.Ct. 347 , 83 L.Ed. 334 . … City of Gainesville v. Brown-Crummer Co., 277 U.S. 54 , 48 S.Ct. 454 , 72 L.Ed. 781 . The statute is clear, especially in view of its history, and the Supreme Court has uniformly sustained it.

Corporation of the Royal Exchange Assurance v. United States

6 F. Supp. 689 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 8, 1934

United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, 280 U. S. 320 , 50 S. Ct. 118 , 74 L. Ed. 451 . … Rice v. U. S., 122 U. S. 611 , 617, 7 S. Ct. 1377, 1381 , 30 L. Ed. 793 . And the question of the bar of the statute may properly be raised by exception to the libel. U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation v.

In re Henschel

109 F. 861 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 22, 1901

Thompson v. Burhans, 61 N. Y. 52, 63 ; Rogers v. Pell, 154 N. Y. 518, 529 , 49 N. E. 75 ; Montag v. Linn, 19 Ill. 399 ; People v. De Camp, 12 Hun, 378 , 379. Eight of the proxies allowed to vote for Mr. … Justice Brown in Re Wetmore (D. C.) 16 N. B. R. 514, 518 .

Doe v. First UNUM Life Insurance Company

District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 29, 2025

Peter Brown, M.D., board certified in psychiatry, to conduct a peer review and analyze whether the available medical records suggested restrictions and limitations that would … .”); Eugene S. v.

Roberts v. Knowlton

377 F. Supp. 1381 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 8, 1974

Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 476 F.2d 687, 692-693 (2d Cir. 1973); Checker Motors Corp. v. … White v. Knowlton, 361 F.Supp. 445 (S.D.N.Y.1973); Andrews v. Knowlton, 367. F.Supp. 1263 (S.D.N.Y.1973) (Knapp, J.).

United States v. National Maritime Union of America

196 F. Supp. 374 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 10, 1961

United States v. National Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass’n, 2 Cir., 292 F.2d 190 . The restraining order of July 3, 1961 directed the defendants to show cause on. … The Board of Inquiry concluded that this proposed National Health, Safety and Military Cargo Clearance Board could not achieve these purposes and therefore should not be adopted.

Bernstein v. Mediobanca Banca di Credito Finanziario-Societa Per Azioni

78 F.R.D. 1 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 9, 1978

Papilsky v. Berndt, 466 F.2d 251, 258 (2d Cir. 1972); Certain-Teed Products Corporation v. Topping, 171 F.2d 241, 243 (2d Cir. 1948); Brendle v. Smith, 7 F.R.D. 119, 120 (S.D.N.Y.1946). … Abramson v. Pennwood Investment Corp., supra; see also Ruskay v. Waddell, supra; Stella v. Kaiser, 218 F.2d 64, 66-68 (2d Cir. 1954), cert, denied, 350 U.S. 835 , 76 S.Ct. 71 , 100 L.Ed. 745 (1955).

EFS Marketing, Inc. v. Russ Berrie & Co., Inc.

836 F. Supp. 128 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 27, 1993

Defendant Russell Berrie is the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer, and the majority shareholder of the corporate defendant. Both sides in this dispute market lines of troll dolls. … See Phis Products, 722 F.2d at 1004-05 ; Brown v. Quiniou, 744 F.Supp. 463, 467 (S.D.N.Y.1990).

Six West Retail Acquisition, Inc. v. Sony Theatre Management Corp.

203 F.R.D. 98 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 6, 2001

For instance, in Thomas v. … Devlin, 2000 WL 28173 , at *4; see also Yaskawa Electric Corp. v. Kollmorgen Corp., No. 00 C 1757, 2001 WL 649532, at *2 (N.D. Ill. June 7, 2001); Buzzeo v. Board of Education, 178 F.R.D. 390, 393 (E.D.N.Y.1998).

DISTRICT 65, UAW v. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.

576 F. Supp. 1468 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 30, 1983

Utility Workers Union v. … Compare Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co., 713 F.2d 254, 260 (7th Cir.1983).

Salsitz v. Peltz

210 F.R.D. 95 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 17, 2002

create a misrepresentation as to whether the Board of Directors favored the Dutch Auction, (id. at 1146). … See, e.g., Simon v. Eastern Ky.

Langston v. Levitt

425 F. Supp. 642 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 7, 1977

McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 420, 426 , 81 S.Ct. 1101 , 6 L.Ed.2d 393 (1961); Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Comm’rs, 330 U.S. 552, 564 , 67 5.Ct. 910, 91 L.Ed. 1093 (1947); Lindsley v. … Accord, August v. Bronstein, supra at 194; see Brown v. Supreme Court of Virginia, 359 F.Supp. 549, 546 (E.D.Va.) (three-judge court), aff’d mem., 414 U.S. 1034 , 94 S.Ct. 534 , 38 L.Ed.2d 327 (1973).