Case law

Lomas Financial Corp. v. Northern Trust Co. (In Re Lomas Financial Corp.)

117 B.R. 64 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 6, 1990

Tucker Anthony Realty Corp. v. Schlesinger, 888 F.2d 969, 972 (2d Cir.1989) (citing Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co. v. Leslie and Elliott Co., Inc., 867 F.2d 150 (2d Cir.1989) (per curiam)). … See Truck Drivers Local 807 v. Carey Transportation Inc., 816 F.2d 82, 88 (2d Cir.1987). 3 .

Alcatel Space, S.A. v. Loral Space & Communications Ltd.

154 F. Supp. 2d 570 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 26, 2001

See Johnson v. … Vanderminden v.

McLeod v. Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'n, Local Union 28

334 F. Supp. 1098 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 29, 1971

Petitioner seeks a temporary injunction, pending final disposition of charges before the Second Region of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), restraining respondent from engaging in certain conduct believed to be a … NLRB v. Enterprise Association, 285 F.2d 642 (2d Cir. 1961). The court also finds that petitioner’s belief that respondent has violated Section 8(b) (4) (i) (ii) (D) is also reasonable.

Snyder v. Home Ins.

133 F. 848 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 10, 1904

I think that the admitted breach of the warranty that the canal boat should at all times have a competent watchman on board bars a recovery. The cases of Lewis v. Ætna Ins. Co. (D. C.) 123 Fed. 157 , and Lewis v. … In this case there was an express warranty that the boat should at all times have a competent watchman on board.

Freedom Holdings, Inc. v. Spitzer

447 F. Supp. 2d 230 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 14, 2004

(“R.J.Reynolds”), Brown and Williamson Tobacco Co. (“Brown & Williamson”), and Lorillard Tobacco Co. (“Lorillard”). … Plaintiffs have shown a likelihood that Parker v. Brown, does not exempt the repeal of the Allocable Share Release provision of the Escrow Statute. C.

Carmona v. Ward

436 F. Supp. 1153 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 4, 1977

This is not a case such as Needel v. … See Hutcherson v.

Antonious v. Muhammad

873 F. Supp. 817 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 19, 1995

Plaintiffs argue that Brown v. Bullock, 17 A.D.2d 424 , 235 N.Y.S.2d 837 (1962) compels a different result. … See Petrella v. Siegel, 843 F.2d 87 , 90 (2d Cir.1988); Brown v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 602 F.Supp. 549, 551 (S.D.N.Y.1984); Parkhurst v. Berdell, 110 N.Y. 386, 392-93 , 18 N.E. 123 (1888); Samhammer v.

Van Pelt v. The Alaska

27 F. 704 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 17, 1886

Brown, J. At a little past 12 o’clock on the night of December 2, 1883, when the steam-ship Alaska, bound for New York, was about 12 miles S. ¡3. … In the case of McLaren v. Compagnie Francaise, 9 App.

Campbell v. Weihe Yu

25 F. Supp. 3d 472 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 10, 2014

See Scalisi v. … Shoen v.

Real Estate Board of New York, Inc. v. The City Of New York

District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 3, 2025

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK REAL ESTATE BOARD OF NEW YORK, INC., … Co-op., Inc. v. Mass. Mun. Wholesale Elec. Co., 922 F.2d 92, 98 (2d Cir. 1990); see also U. S. Postal Serv. v.

Levin v. Mississippi River Corporation

289 F. Supp. 353 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 30, 1968

the 15 members of Mopac’s board are joined herein as parties defendant. … Thus, the court’s decree will not be “effective” unless a quorum of the board of directors are parties defendant. Schuckman v. Rubenstein, 164 F.2d at 957 .

Wesley-Dickson v. Warwick Valley Central School District

973 F. Supp. 2d 386 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 24, 2013

Henry v. … v.

Robinson v. McLeod

213 F. Supp. 111 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 8, 1963

International Ass’n of Tool Craftsmen v. Leedom, supra; Leedom v. Norwich, Conn. Printing Specialties & Paper Products Union, supra. . National Labor Relations Board v. … National Labor Relations Board, 209 F.2d 782 (7 Cir., 1953), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 824 , 75 S.Ct. 38 , 99 L.Ed. 649 (1954); National Labor Relations Board v.

Sudarsky v. City of New York

779 F. Supp. 287 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 22, 1991

Brady v. Town of Colchester, 863 F.2d 205, 211-12 (2d Cir.1988) (citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 576-77 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2708-09 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)). … Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, 408 U.S. at 577 , 92 S.Ct. at 2709 .

Shanker v. Helsby

515 F. Supp. 871 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 18, 1981

Vance v. Bradley, 440 U.S. 93, 97 , 99 S.Ct. 939, 943 , 59 L.Ed.2d 171 (1979) (quoting Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. … Finkel v. New York City Board of Education, 474 F.Supp. 468, 471 (E.D.N. Y.1979), aff’d mem., 622 F.2d 573 (2d Cir. 1980).

United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

908 F. Supp. 143 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 8, 1995

. —, 115 S.Ct. 199 , 130 L.Ed.2d 130 (1994); United States v. IBT (Adelstein), 998 F.2d 120 , 124 (2d Cir.1993); United States v. … (Zahner Letter at 2 (citing Fed.R.Evid. 703; Investigations Officer v. Senese, IA Decision at 23 (July 12, 1990), aff'd, United States v.

United States v. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill

505 F. Supp. 1101 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 29, 1981

In United States v. D. H. … The two cases on which it relies for the proposition that the cause of action accrued when it suffered actual damages, the date when the Board rendered its decision, are inapposite. In United States v.

Rizzi v. Murff

171 F. Supp. 362 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 16, 1959

. § 6.1 (c) the Board is authorized to require the certification of any case involving deportation to the Board. … Frangoulis v. Shaughnessy, supra; United States ex rel. Lo Duca v. Neelly, supra.

Brockway v. Tofany

319 F. Supp. 811 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 5, 1970

Alabama State Board of Education, 294 F.2d 150 (5th Cir. 1961) (expulsion from college); Powelton Civic Home Own. Assn. v. … Board of Elections, 380 F.2d 445 (2d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1048 , 88 S.Ct. 768 , 19 L.Ed.2d 840 (1968); Utica Mutual Insurance Company v.

Nussbacher v. Chase Manhattan Bank (NA)

444 F. Supp. 973 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 3, 1978

Moreover, in an affidavit dated April 24, 1973, Saul Steinberg, chairman of the board of directors of Leasco (Defendant’s Exhibit F) attested to the board’s conclusion that the derivative action was inconsistent with the … Bell v. J. D. Winer & Co., supra, at 653; Freeman v. Marine Midland Bank-New York, 419 F.Supp. 440, 451-452 (E.D.N.Y.1976); Drasner v.