Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.25s
Progress Bulk Carriers v. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n
2 F. Supp. 3d 499 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 21, 2014
Hoar, Inc. v. Sara Lee Corp., 900 F.2d 522, 525 (2d Cir.1990) (“Matters concerning discovery generally are considered nondispositive of the litigation.”); see also Thai Lao Lignite (Thailand) Co., Ltd. v. … See Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp., 306 F.3d 17 (2d Cir.2002); see also Shann v. Dunk, 84 F.3d 73 (2d Cir.1996).
Cited 15 timesPublishedPetition of Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.
184 F. Supp. 585 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 14, 1960
In O’Connor v. … United States, supra; Burch, v. United States, 4 Cir., 261 F.2d 418 . 17 . In Stiles v.
Modified by Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v. Richardson, 295 F.2d 583 (1961)Cited 14 timesPublished522 F. Supp. 1257 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 30, 1981
Brown Bros. Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Beam Constr. Corp., 41 N.Y.2d 397 , 393 N.Y.S.2d 350 , 352, 361 N.E.2d 999, 1001 (1977). … United States v. Bedford Associates, supra, 657 F.2d at 1310 . Additionally, the alleged need for SCM Board approval of any final agreements, e. g. Ashton v.
Reversed on other grounds by Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,667 Reprosystem, B v. and N. Norman Muller, and Cross-Appellants v. Scm Corporation, and Cross-Appellee, 727 F.2d 257 (1984)Cited 25 timesPublished576 F. Supp. 1038 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 7, 1983
United States v. Turkish, 623 F.2d 769, 777 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1077 [ 101 S.Ct. 856 , 66 L.Ed.2d 800 ] (1981); see also United States v. … United States v. Shakur, 560 F.Supp. 318 , 335' n. 23 (S.D.N.Y.1983).
Cited 0 timesPublished168 F. Supp. 3d 597 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 2, 2016
See Sousa v. … Mallon points to an apparent discrepancy between the holdings in Closson v. Board of Selectmen and Stokes v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedIn Re WorldCom, Inc. Securities Litigation
382 F. Supp. 2d 549 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 29, 2005
Brown, Inc. (n/k/a/ Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.), [8] and Lehman Brothers, Inc. ("Underwriter Defendants"). [9] Other investment banks that are *554 listed as defendants are separately represented. … See 3Com Corp. v.
Cited 29 timesPublishedFull Gospel Tabernacle v. Community School District 27
979 F. Supp. 214 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 24, 1997
See, e.g., Deeper Life Christian Fellowship v. Board of Education, 852 F.2d 676 , 679 (2d Cir.1988). … Allen Oil Co. v.
Cited 6 timesPublished19 F. 139 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 28, 1883
Brown, J. This is an action for seaman’s wages upon an English ship, for 45 days, from June 12 to July 26, 1883. … So far as the right to impose a fine rests upon a foreign statute, it must undoubtedly be properly pleaded, (Holmes v. Broughton, 10 Wend. 75 ; Andrews v. Herriot, 4 Cow. 525 ; Ennis v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSandra Satina v. City of New York, Cathy Rush-Brown, and John and Jane Doe
District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 20, 2026
Cross v. N.Y.C. … See Ruiz v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown410 F. Supp. 2d 228 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 20, 2006
Hodgson, 963 F.Supp. 776, 784 (citing Ranyard v. Board of Regents, 708 F.2d 1235, 1238 (7th Cir.1983)). … Sullivan v. Board of Regents, 209 Wis. 242 , 244 N.W. 563, 564 (1932) (finding that a board of regents “is an agency of the state set up to perform certain specified administrative duties”).
Cited 15 timesPublishedUnited States Ex Rel. Spinney v. Fay
221 F. Supp. 419 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 28, 1963
Brown v. Allen, supra, 344 U.S. at 485 , 73 S.Ct. at 421 , 88 L.Ed. 572 . … Brown v. Allen, supra, Ex parte Hawk, supra.
Cited 13 timesPublishedJasmine L. Brown v. New York Presbyterian/Lawrence Hospital; 1199 SEIU Benefit and Pension Funds
District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 25, 2026
BROWN, Plaintiff, -v.- … See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for service).
Cited 0 timesUnknown192 F. Supp. 325 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 15, 1961
United States v. Brown, 1954, 348 U.S. 110 , 75 S.Ct. 141 , 99 L.Ed. 139 ; Brooks v. United States, 1949, 337 U.S. 49 , 69 S.Ct. 918 , 93 L.Ed. 1200 . See Knecht v. United States, 3 Cir., 1957, 242 F.2d 929 . … United States v. Brown, 1954, 348 U.S. 110, 112 , 75 S.Ct. 141, 144 , 99 L.Ed. 139 . This rationale was again stressed by the Supreme Court in Indian Towing Co. v.
Cited 25 timesPublished410 F. Supp. 1080 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 17, 1976
Hines v. State Board of Parole, supra; Matter of Briguglio v. N.Y.S. Board of Parole, supra; People v. Fink, supra; accord, People ex rel. Schuster v. … Johnson v. Chairman, N. Y. S. Board of Parole, supra, 4 and Haymes v. Regan, supra. The Johnson court reasoned that Morrissey v.
Cited 29 timesPublishedIn Re Buspirone Patent Litigation
185 F. Supp. 2d 340 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 14, 2002
Brown dated November 7, 2001 (“Brown Decl.”). … to Brown Decl. at B-133.
Cited 8 timesPublished439 F. Supp. 975 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 27, 1977
Hadnott v. Ames, 320 F.Supp. at 119, 124 . … Sununu v. Stark, 353 F.Supp. at 1291 .
Cited 6 timesPublishedRepublic of Cape Verde v. A & A Partners
89 F.R.D. 14 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 2, 1980
See, e. g., Class v. Norton, 505 F.2d 123 (2d Cir. 1974); Stolberg v. Members of the Board of Trustees for the State Colleges of the State of Connecticut, 474 F.2d 485 (2d Cir. 1973); Bell v. … School Board of Powhatan County, Virginia, 321 F.2d 494 (4th Cir. 1963). . See, e. g., Copeland v. Martinez, 603 F.2d 981 (D.C.Cir.1979). Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedConsolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. McLeod
202 F. Supp. 351 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 7, 1962
Empresa Hondurena de Vapores v. McLeod, 300 F.2d 222 (2d Cir., 1962.) . Fitzgerald v. Douds, 167 F.2d 714 (2d Cir., 1948). . Fay v. Douds, 172 F.2d 720 (2d Cir., 1949). . Leedom v. … Empresa Hondurena de Vapores v. McLeod, supra.
Cited 8 timesPublishedXavier Joseph Nampiaparampil v. New York City Campaign Finance Board, et al.
District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 1, 2026
PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: Plaintiff Xavier Joseph Nampiaparampil, proceeding pro se, brings this case against the New York City Campaign Finance Board (the “Board” or “CFB … Vitagliano v. County of Westchester, 71 F.4th 130, 136 (2d Cir. 2023) (per curiam) (quoting Clapper v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJaffee v. Newspaper & Mail Deliverers' Union of New York & Vicinity
97 F. Supp. 443 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 10, 1951
Schine Chain Theatres v. United States, 334 U.S. 110 at page 126, 68 S.Ct. 947 , 92 L.Ed. 1245 ; May Dept. Stores Co. v. … pending the final adjudication of the Board, Douds v.
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna