Case law

Kelleher v. Reich

532 F. Supp. 845 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 24, 1982

V. v. Isbrandtsen Co., 339 F.2d 440, 441 (2d Cir. 1964); Miletic v. Holm & Wonsild, 294 F.Supp. 772, 775 (S.D. *847 N.Y.1968). Defendants’ motion is therefore granted. 9 U.S.C. §§ 2 , 3 (1976). … See Bear v. Hayden, Stone, Inc., 526 F.2d 734, 736 (9th Cir. 1975); Legg, Mason & Co. v. Mackall & Coe, Inc., 351 F.Supp. 1367, 1371-72 (D.D.C.1972); Osborne & Thurlow v.

Clarkson Co. Ltd. v. Shaheen

533 F. Supp. 905 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 28, 1982

Bradford Shaheen stated that he never made a maintenance payment to Brown Harris Stevens, Inc., the managing agent. Ms. … In his 1976 federal income tax return, John Shaheen claimed a deduction for interest payments to Brown Harris.

Weinberger v. Kendrick

432 F. Supp. 316 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 24, 1977

Cameron-Brown Co., 72 F.R.D. 48 (M.D.N.C.1976); Oleck v. Fischer, 401 F.Supp. 651, 657 (S.D.N.Y.1975); and, Bender v. New Zealand Bank & Trust Co., 67 F.R.D. 638 (S.D.N.Y.1974). But see Rich v. … In Oleck v.

Brownko International, Inc. v. Ogden Steel Co.

585 F. Supp. 1432 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 6, 1983

Brown-ko brief at 2. That may be so as to Brown-ko, which sold the billets to Buck; but as Buck points out in its brief at 15 n. 13, as to Ogden its claim does not involve breach of warranty claims under the Code. … (III) The Minutes of the November 19, 1974 Meeting of Andec’s Board.

The Eureka No. 32

108 F. 672 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 7, 1901

BROWN, District Judge. … Ed. 1001 ; Loughin *674 v. McCaulley, 186 Pa. 517 , 40 Atl. 1020 .

Nampiaparampil v. The New York City Campaign Finance Board

District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 2, 2025

(MacNamara v. City of New York, 249 F.R.D. 70, 77 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)). … In Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v.

Mattina v. Chinatown Carting Corp.

290 F. Supp. 2d 386 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 30, 2003

Retired Persons Pharmacy v. NLRB, 519 F.2d 486, 492 (2d Cir.1975). In Bourne v. … Ctr. v. NLRB, 156 F.3d 405 , 410 (2d Cir.1998).

Tab Partnership v. Grantland Financial Corp.

866 F. Supp. 807 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 4, 1994

Bond Litigation, 800 F.Supp. 1128, 1135 (S.D.N.Y.1992), aff'd sub nom., Menowitz v. Brown, 991 F.2d 36 (2d Cir.1993). … See Fonte v. Board of Managers of Continental Towers Condominium, 848 F.2d 24, 25 (2d Cir.1988). We again treat this purely as a motion to dismiss. See Fort Wayne Telsat v.

Cohen v. Litt

906 F. Supp. 957 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 12, 1995

CSB 12 is a local school board, elected by the voters of District 12 and having jurisdiction over CS 67. … Id.; see also Brandt v. Board of Coop. Educ.

River Plate & Brazil Conferences v. Pressed Steel Car Co.

124 F. Supp. 88 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 17, 1954

In Isbrandtsen Co. v. … Isbrandtsen Co. v. United States, note 8 supra, 211 F.2d 51 . . Pacific Westbound Conference v. Leval & Co., Or., 269 P.2d 541 .

WMCA, Inc. v. Lomenzo

238 F. Supp. 916 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 16, 1965

In Davis v. Mann, 377 U.S. 678 , 84 S.Ct. 1453 , 12 L.Ed.2d 609 , a companion case to Reynolds v. Sims, supra, and WMCA, Inc. v. … McNeese v. Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668 , 83 S.Ct. 1433 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 .

Minpeco, S.A. v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.

552 F. Supp. 332 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 24, 1982

In Chiarella v. … Judge Woolsey reached a similar conclusion in United States v. Brown, 5 F.Supp. 81, 93 (S.D.N.Y.1933), aff’d on other grounds, 79 F.2d 321 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom McCarthy v.

Ritz Cycle Car Co. v. Driggs-Seabury Ordnance Corp.

237 F. 125 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 6, 1916

But see Wolf Bros. & Co. v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co., 206 Fed. 611 , 124 C. C. A. 409 . Complainant’s profits would ordinarily (not be the true measure of damages for infringement o'f trade-mark rights. … Encyc. of Law (2d Ed.) page 437; Browne on Trade-Marks (2d Ed.) page 506.

Fresno County Employees' Retirement Ass'n v. comScore, Inc.

268 F. Supp. 3d 526 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 28, 2017

Within a month, in December 2016, Abraham and Matta each resigned from the Board of Directors. SAC ¶¶ 35, 37. *543 On February 8, 2017, NASDAQ suspended trading of comScore common stock. Brown Dec!. … Browne Dec!.

United States v. Samet

207 F. Supp. 2d 269 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 26, 2002

Board of Educ. v. Grumet, 512 U.S. 687 , 114 S.Ct. 2481 , 129 L.Ed.2d 546 (1994); Attorney General v. Grumet, 510 U.S. 1107 , 114 S.Ct. 1046 , 127 L.Ed.2d 369 (1994); Board of Educ. v. … Grumet, 510 U.S. 989 , 114 S.Ct. 544 , 126 L.Ed.2d 446 (1993); Board of Educ. v. Gru-met, 509 U.S. 938 , 114 S.Ct. 10 , 125 L.Ed.2d 762 (1993).

The D. Sargeant

7 F. Cas. 1120 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 15, 1863

The other witness, Brown, states the matter with more openness. … S. v. The General C. C. Pinckney [Case No. 5,309], reversing a decision rendered in this court in the year 1862, in an analogous case.

Central Principal Dwelling Board of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation v. New Hampshire Insurance

904 F. Supp. 203 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 10, 1995

Maganlal & Co. v. M.G. Chem. Co., 942 F.2d 164, 167 (2d Cir.1991). … In Gulf Oil Corp. v.

Munson v. Straits of Dover S. S. Co.

99 F. 787 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 3, 1900

BROWN, District Judge. … Board, 1 Cab. & El. 272, is in point.

Spaulding v. Parry Navigation Co.

90 F. Supp. 564 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 3, 1950

Bohn v. American Export Lines, D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1941, 42 F.Supp. 228 ; Kravas v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., D.C.W.D.Pa. 1939, 28 F.Supp. 66 ; Brown v. … Answer: Yes. (2) If the answer to (1) is “yes”, was it the general practice at the Port of New ■York in August 1947 for ship repair companies to provide a ladder or gangway for the ship’s crew to board and leave their vessel

Altschul v. Paine Webber, Inc.

488 F. Supp. 858 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 30, 1980

& Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. … Board of Education v. Nyquist, 590 F.2d 1241, 1246 (2d Cir. 1979) (attorney could represent defendant though adversary defendant indirectly contributes to the payment of first defendant’s legal fees).