Case law

Kaplan v. Vincent

937 F. Supp. 307 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 10, 1996

The first, a Publishing Agreement, dated April 8, 1994, was signed by Kaplan and Vincent and Little, Brown and Company (“Little, Brown”) in July 1994. … See Flickinger v. Harold C. Brown & Co., 947 F.2d 595, 600 (2d Cir.1991). Accordingly, we dismiss Kaplan’s claim for breach of contract on this basis. III.

Gallagher v. New York State Board of Elections

District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 23, 2020

See, e.g., Olin Corp. v. Lamorak Ins. Co., 325 F.R.D. 85, 87 (S.D.N.Y. 2018); Degrafinreid v. Ricks, 417 F. Supp. 2d 403, 407 (S.D.N.Y. 2006). … See, e.g., Poseidon Capital Corp. v. Nicolet Instrument Corp., No. 85 Civ. 6118, 1985 WL 3344, at *1 (S.D.N.Y.

Board of Trustees of the I.A.T.S.E. Annuity Fund, Board of Trustees of the I.A.T.S.E. National Health and Welfare Fund, Board of Trustees of the I.A.T.S.E. National Pension Fund, and Board of Trustees v. Paradise Square Broadway Limited Partnership

District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 24, 2023

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE I.A.T.S.E. … See, e.g., Handelsman v. Bedford Vill. Assocs. L.P., 213 F.3d 48 (2d Cir. 2000).

The Zenobia

30 F. Cas. 919 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 15, 1847

Wolf v. Summers, 2 Camp. 631; Mulloy v. Backer, 5 East, 316; Howland v. The Lavinia [Case No. 6,797]; Griggs v. Austin, 3 Pick. 20 . … Hooper [Case No. 11,185]; Watson v. Duykinek, 3 Johns. 335 ; Griggs v. Austin, 3 Pick. 20 ).

Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners

District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 22, 2025

25-CV-0510 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL NEW YORK STATE BOARD … See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED.

Fresno County Employees' Retirement Ass'n v. comScore, Inc.

268 F. Supp. 3d 526 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 28, 2017

Within a month, in December 2016, Abraham and Matta each resigned from the Board of Directors. SAC ¶¶ 35, 37. *543 On February 8, 2017, NASDAQ suspended trading of comScore common stock. Brown Dec!. … Browne Dec!.

Loud v. The Doris Eckhoff

32 F. 555 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 2, 1887

Brown, J. … Sturgis v. Boyer, 24 How. 110 .

The Kaiser Wilhelm Der Grosse

175 F. 215 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 17, 1909

On board the Kaiser Wilhelm libelant was a passenger, and sustained personal injuries by reason of collision. … C.) 25 Fed. 835 , is an explicit authority. judge Brown founded his application of the rule in part upon the analogy of equity and of the cases cited by him. Farquharson v. Seton, 5 Russ. 45, is exactly in point.

New York & C. Mail S. S. Co. v. The Express

46 F. 860 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 24, 1891

This case has no resemblance to that of Sturgis v. Boyer, 24 How. 110 , because there the master and crew were not on board, and had no participation in the faulty navigation. … If any doubt could exist as to what was meant in Sturgis v.

Weinberger v. Kendrick

432 F. Supp. 316 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 24, 1977

Cameron-Brown Co., 72 F.R.D. 48 (M.D.N.C.1976); Oleck v. Fischer, 401 F.Supp. 651, 657 (S.D.N.Y.1975); and, Bender v. New Zealand Bank & Trust Co., 67 F.R.D. 638 (S.D.N.Y.1974). But see Rich v. … In Oleck v.

Yang v. New York State Board of Elections

District Court, S.D. New York · May 5, 2020

Co. v. … Crist v.

Yang v. New York State Board of Elections

District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 30, 2020

ROGER GREEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, -against- 20 Civ. 3325 (AT) NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, … See Murawski v. N.Y. State Bd. of Elections, 285 F. Supp. 3d 691, 695-96 (S.D.N.Y. 2018): Tiraco v. N_Y. State Bd. of Elections, 963 F. Supp. 2d 184, 192-93 (E.D.N-Y. 2013). SO ORDERED.

Nampiaparampil v. The New York City Campaign Finance Board

District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 2, 2025

(MacNamara v. City of New York, 249 F.R.D. 70, 77 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)). … In Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v.

United States v. Burger

717 F. Supp. 245 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 20, 1989

Graham, 309 F.2d 210 (9th Cir.1962) (whether Board was liable under § 6672 depended on whether it controlled the payment of the corporation’s tax debt); see also Simpson v. … United States, 504 F.2d 1306 (1st Cir.1974) (responsible person was majority shareholder, president, and treasurer); Brown v.

The Belgier

246 F. 966 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 13, 1917

It is settled by the case of Patterson v. Bark Eudora, 190 U. S. 169 , 23 Sup. Ct. 821, 47 L. … Judge Brown, in The State of Maine (D.

Munson v. Straits of Dover S. S. Co.

99 F. 787 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 3, 1900

BROWN, District Judge. … Board, 1 Cab. & El. 272, is in point.

Brodsky v. The New York City Campaign Finance Board

District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 12, 2025

Clarke v. Frank, 960 F.2d 1146, 1150 (2d Cir. 1992) (emphasis added). And “a party cannot avoid the preclusive effect of res judicata by asserting a new theory or a different remedy,” Brown Media Corp. v. … Co. v. United States, 168 U.S. 1, 48-49 (1897); see also, e.g., United States v.

Donato v. Fitzgibbons

172 F.R.D. 69 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 16, 1996

United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 710 , 94 S.Ct. 3090, 3108 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1974). … For reasons which are not apparent to this Court, counsel cites Brown v. Matias, 102 F.R.D. 580 (S.D.N.Y. 1984) (Wcinfcld, J.), in support of the claim of privilege.

Ventura v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.

125 F.R.D. 595 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 11, 1989

Brown Dep. at 12. Woodhull Hospital (“Hospital”), a hospital within and part of HCC, formally initiated this program in February, 1987. … See, e.g., Hart v. Community School Board #21, 512 F.2d 37 (2d Cir.1975); Pride v. Community School Board #18, 482 F.2d 257 (2d Cir.1973); Graham v. State of New York, 664 F.Supp. 166 (S.D. N.Y.1987); Laurido v.

Haberman v. Murchison

331 F. Supp. 180 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 13, 1971

American Beverage Corp., 265 App.Div. 208, 218 , 38 N.Y.S.2d 517, 526 (1st Dept. 1942) even when the buyer is given control of the board of directors. See Essex Universal Corp. v. … See Brown v. Halbert, 271 Cal.App.2d 252 , 76 Cal.Rptr. 781 (Cal.App.1969); Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co., 1 Cal. *189 3d 93, 81 Cal.Rptr. 592 , 460 P.2d 464 (1969). If the intimation in Ferraioli v.