Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.68s
196 F.R.D. 20 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 21, 2000
See Copeland v. Rosen, 194 F.R.D. 127 (S.D.N.Y.2000). … Br. at 7-8 (citing NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415 , 83 S.Ct. 328 , 9 L.Ed.2d 405 (1963); Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 , 68 S.Ct. 836 , 92 L.Ed. 1161 (1948)).
Cited 2 timesPublished997 F. Supp. 438 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 11, 1998
See Brown v. City of Oneonta, 106 F.3d 1125, 1133 (2d Cir.1997) (determining that qualified immunity shielded defendants, upon concluding that plaintiffs’ failed to state claim under section 1985(3)). … Browning Avenue Realty Corp. v. Rosenshein, 774 F.Supp. 129, 137 (S.D.N.Y.1991) (citing Luce v. Edelstein, 802 F.2d 49, 54 (2d Cir.1986)).
Cited 45 timesPublished978 F. Supp. 491 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 21, 1997
. $ 500,000 V. … through the Planing Board,” and “guide [DeFalco] through the muddy waters.”
Cited 2 timesPublishedRubin v. New York City Board of Education
District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 12, 2023
: 20 Civ. 10208 (LGS) -against- : : ORDER__ NEW YORK CITY BOARD … Elghourab v. Vista JFK, LLC, No. 17 Civ. 911, 2019 WL 13218564, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. July 31, 2019), aff’d, 818 F. App’x 63 (2d Cir. 2020); see City of Hartford v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownEvans v. New York & P. S. S. Co.
163 F. 405 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 19, 1906
Beers v. Simpson, 2 L. J. (O. S.) K. B. 212; Sherman v. Commercial Printing Co., 29 Mo. App. 31 . … Fairfax v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. Co., 67 N. Y. 11 .
Cited 19 timesPublishedRubin v. New York City Board of Education
District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 3, 2023
Salahuddin v. Cuomo, 861 F.2d 40, 42 (2d Cir. 1988); accord Harden v. Doe, No. 19 Civ. 3839, 2019 WL 2578157, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. June 24, 2019); see also Prezzi v. … See Prezzi, 469 F.2d at 692; accord Mendes Da Costa v. Marcucilli, 675 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownKrause v. Small Business Administration
502 F. Supp. 1332 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 17, 1980
Ellis v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 613 F.2d 49 (3d Cir. 1980) (per curiam); Kyle v. Interstate Commerce Comm’n, 609 F.2d 540 (D.C.Cir.1980) (per curiam); Penna v. … Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693, 702-10 , 96 S.Ct. 1155, 1161 , 47 L.Ed.2d 405 (1976); Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 573-74 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2707 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Wisconsin v.
Cited 7 timesPublished658 F. Supp. 547 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 1, 1987
The Appeal Board of the NYHRD upheld the decision as “not arbitrary, capricious or an abuse of discretion.” Id. at 464 , 102 S.Ct. at 1888 . The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, affirmed the decision. Id. … Id. at 484 , 102 S.Ct. at 1899 ; see also Brown v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 602 F.Supp. 549 (S.D.N.Y.1984).
Cited 13 timesPublished560 F. Supp. 318 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 28, 1983
See, e.g., United States v. … See United States v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedBrowning Avenue Realty Corp. v. Rosenshein
774 F. Supp. 129 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 7, 1991
Browning provides a partial quote from Connecticut National Bank v. … Claiming that Rubin had a fiduciary relationship with Browning (a “fact” that is not alleged in the Second Amended Complaint), Browning quotes Beck v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedRubin v. New York City Board of Education
District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 18, 2022
COURT DATE FILED: 10/18/2022 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LISE RUBIN, Plaintiff, -against- ORDER NEW YORK CITY BOARD … A judge has “an affirmative duty” not to unnecessarily disqualify herself, Nat'l Auto Brokers Corp. v. Gen.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCSX Transportation, Inc. v. New York State Office of Real Property Services
150 F. Supp. 2d 605 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 10, 2001
Brown, Frank B. … Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents, 528 U.S. 62, 81 , 120 S.Ct. 631 , 145 L.Ed.2d 522 (2000).
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · Dec 15, 2025
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ALTAUNE BROWN, Plaintiff, -v- 24 Civ. 8114 (PAE) (HJR) LAY WIN HERBAL, INC. ef al., … ' Because the motion to dismiss solely argues that Brown lacks standing to sue, “the proper vehicle for the motion is Rule 12(b)(1), not Rule 12(b)(6).” See Report at 4 (citing All. For Env’t Renewal, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSocieta Anonima Agrumaria di Navigazione v. Angier
32 F. 230 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 24, 1887
Brown, J. The pleadings and the evidence sufficiently establish a shortage of 54 boxes of fruit. … Matthiessen v. Gusi, 29 Fed. Rep. 794.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · Jan 16, 2026
See Wolf v. New Jersey, No.1:17-CV-1624 (CM), 2017 WL 11930764, at *1 n.1 (S.D.N.Y. … Blair & Co. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWhitney v. Empire Blue Cross and Blue Shield
920 F. Supp. 477 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 19, 1996
Brown, 898 F.2d at 1561 (citation omitted). See also Pitman v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Oklahoma, 24 F.3d 118, 123 (10th Cir. 1994); Doe v. … See, e.g., Atwood v. Newmont Gold Co., Inc., 45 F.3d 1317 (9th Cir.1995); Doe v. Group Hospitalization & Medical Serv., 3 F.3d 80, 87 (4th Cir.1993); Brown v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedAraman v. Real Estate Board of New York
District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 1, 2022
Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58 (1982). This Court thus lacks jurisdiction to consider Plaintiff’s motion for recusal. See Straw v. … Uppal v. Bank of Am., No. 18-CV-3085 (CM), 2018 WL 10323031, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. June 12, 2018) (quoting Lewis v. Tuscan Dairy Farms, Inc., 25 F.3d 1138, 1141 (2d Cir. 1994)).
Cited 0 timesUnknown585 F. Supp. 1348 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 23, 1984
The legislature has seen fit to commit the administration of this complex body of laws to the overlapping jurisdictions of the Loft Board, the Civil Court and' the Supreme Court. … Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance, 629 F.2d 757 (2d Cir.1980), quoting Brown v. First National City Bank, 503 F.2d 114, 118 (2d Cir.1974).
Cited 8 timesPublishedNeall v. General Marine Ins. Co. of Dresden
104 F. 92 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 30, 1900
BROWN, District Judge. … The company’s interest- in these charges was plainly an insurable interest from the moment the goods were shipped on board, independent of any lien on the ship therefor.
Cited 1 timesPublished35 F. 317 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 5, 1888
Brown, J. … There were but two other men on board, and they were below. The captain and the wheelsman testify positively that no change was made in their course.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna