Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysd

10,000+ results

1.34s

  • Cohen v. Bloch

    507 F. Supp. 321 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 1, 1980

    The actions, including the second cause of action added to the instant complaint, concern related activities of the Board. In Sweet v. … Fischer v. International Tel. & Tel. Co., supra, at 173; Clark v. Cameron-Brown Co., 72 F.R.D. 48, 56-57 (M.D.N.C.1976); Byrnes v. IDS Realty Trust, 70 F.R.D. 608 (D.Minn.1976); Ash v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Rosemond v. Menifee

    137 F. Supp. 2d 270 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 22, 2000

    Board of Parole cannot be transferred to the BOP. … . § 3568 ); Brown v. United States, 489 F.2d 1036, 1037 (8th Cir.1974) (per curiam) (“This court has recognized the authority of Davis.”); United States v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Lachman v. Bell

    353 F. Supp. 37 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 30, 1972

    The plaintiff objected to the plan when it was presented to the board of directors. … Brown, 39 Del.Ch. 1 , 157 A.2d 784 ; Bennett v. Breuil Petroleum Corp., 34 Del.Ch. 6 , 99 A.2d 236 (1953).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown

    District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 31, 2026

    Ruiz v. Citibank, N.A., No. 10 Civ. 5950, 2014 WL 4635575, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 19, 2014) (quoting King v. Greiner, No. 2 Civ. 5810, 2009 WL 2001439, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. July 8, 2009)); see also Wilds v. … The Court thus denies Brown’s habeas petition.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Perrotta v. Irizarry

    430 F. Supp. 1274 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 3, 1977

    Williams v. Halperin, supra; Brown v. Duggan, 329 F.Supp. 207 (W.D.Pa.1971). Plaintiff has also failed to allege facts which constitute a claim upon which relief can be granted under 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (3). … Powell v. Workmen’s Compensation Board, 327 F.2d 131 (2d Cir. 1964); Dickinson v. French, 416 F.Supp. 429 (S.D.Ala.1976).

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Washington State Investment Board v. Odebrecht S.A.

    District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 10, 2025

    SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x WASHINGTON STATE INVESTMENT : Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-08118-PGG-BCM BOARD … Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 120 (2d Cir. 2006) (citation omitted). 10.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lutin v. United States Bankruptcy Court for Southern District of New York (In Re Advanced Mining Systems, Inc.)

    173 B.R. 467 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 5, 1994

    Sandra Cotton, Inc. v. Bank of New york, 64 B.R. 262, 263 (W.D.N.Y.1986), appeal dismissed, 87 B.R. 272 (W.D.N.Y.1988), In re Liggett, 118 B.R. 219, 221 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1990). … Brown’s Hotel, 93 B.R. at 53. In the case at bar the fourth factor is not important because the public interest is not meaningfully implicated. The second and third factors strongly favor a stay.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • United States v. Branigan

    299 F. Supp. 225 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 11, 1969

    Indeed, the four dissenters in Everson v. Board of Education, speaking through Mr. … See Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez, 372 U.S. 144, 168-169 , 83 S.Ct. 554 , 9 L.Ed. 2d 644 (1963) ; cf. United States v. Brown, 381 U.S. 437, 458 , 85 S.Ct. 1707 , 14 L.Ed.2d. 484 (1965). . United States v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Rodner v. United States

    149 F. Supp. 233 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 6, 1957

    Rodner was never authorized by the Board of Directors of Warner Bros. Service Corporation or by the Board of Directors of the parent corporation, Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. … Flarsheim v. United States, 8 Cir., 156 F.2d 105 ; Varnedoe v. Allen, 5 Cir., 158 F.2d 467 ; Sutro v. U. S., 42-2 U.S.T.C. Rep. C.C.H. Para. 9523. 2 . “(b) Exclusions from gross income.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Murray v. The John Swan

    50 F. 447 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 26, 1892

    Brown, District Judge. On Junel,1891, the barkentine John Swan', loaded and ready for sea, lay on the north side of the wharf at the foot of North Sixth street, Williamsburgh. … No one was on board of her except a watchman, who was asleep; being roused, he asked that the ship be towed out.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • McGuire v. City of New York

    192 F. Supp. 866 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 30, 1961

    The broader use is within the letter of the definition, but it may well be doubted whether, for example, a libel or a slander put in circulation on board a ship, could be made the basis of a suit in admiralty. * * * ” Brown … De Lovio v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Brown

    District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 20, 2026

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KURELL BROWN, … Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown

    District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 23, 2026

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KURELL BROWN, … Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Veeco Instruments, Inc. Securities Litigation

    434 F. Supp. 2d 267 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 14, 2006

    See, e.g., Langner v. Brown, 913 F.Supp. 260, 264 (S.D.N.Y. 1996). … An essential predicate of the Aronson test is that a decision of the board of directors is being challenged in the derivative suit. Rales v. Blasband, 634 A.2d 927, 933 (Del. 1993).

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Premuda v. Goepel

    23 F. 410 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 14, 1885

    Brown, J. The charter-party contains a warranty that the vessel Bhall be “seaworthy, and in all respects tight, staunch, strong, and every way fitted for such a voyage.” … Rep. 101, 105-107; Tidmarsh v. Washington Ins. Co. 4 Mason, 439, 441 ; The Orient, 16 Fed. Rep. 916; French v. Newgass, 3 C. P. Div. 163.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Chapman v. The Engines of The Greenpoint

    38 F. 671 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 10, 1889

    Brown, J. … The Camanche, 8 Wall. 448, 477 ; Adams v. Bark Island City, 1 Cliff. 210 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Cine 42nd Street Theater Corp. v. Nederlander Organization, Inc.

    609 F. Supp. 113 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 17, 1985

    Mar. 27, 1985), the starting point for any analysis of the state action doctrine is Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943). … City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., 435 U.S. 389, 391 , 98 S.Ct. 1123, 1125 , 55 L.Ed.2d 364 (1978)(citing Parker v. Brown). See also Community Communications Co. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • The Isaac Bell

    9 F. 842 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 22, 1881

    Brown, D. J. This libel was filed by the owner of the schooner George 8. … Y. etc., v. Calderwood,, 19 How. 241, 246 ; The Granite State, 3 Wall. 310, 313 ; The Clarita, 23 Wall. 1, 13 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Rubin v. New York City Board of Education

    District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 5, 2022

    LISE RUBIN, Plaintiff, ORDER -against- 20-CV-10208 (LGS) (KHP) NEW YORK CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., … Est. of Keenan v. Hoffman-Rosenfeld, 2019 WL 3410006, at *22 (E.D.N.Y. July 29, 2019), aff'd, 833 F. App'x 489 (2d Cir. 2020).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • New York & Cuba Mail S. S. Co. v. Royal Exchange Assurance

    145 F. 713 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 28, 1906

    There is a well marked distinction between losses on valued policies of vessels and the goods and freight on board. In discussing the question, valued policies being involved, Judge Brown in the International Nav. … Ins. p. 196: Johnson v. Sheddon, 2 East, 581; Tunno v. Edwards, 12 East, 488; Lawrence v. Insurance Co., 3 Johns. Cas. (N. Y.) 217; Insurance Co. v. Buckner, 5 Miss. 63 ; Stanton v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.