Case law

Earl v. Eli Lilly & Co.

688 F. Supp. 2d 130 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 28, 2009

Menowitz v. Brown, 991 F.2d 36, 40 (2d Cir.1993) (citing Van Dusen v. Barrack, 376 U.S. 612 , 84 S.Ct. 805 , 11 L.Ed.2d 945 (1964)). … See, e.g., Motus v.

Taylor v. Rogich

45 F. Supp. 3d 223 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 2, 2014

Discussion Last year, in Weather v. … Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 239 , 129 S.Ct. 808 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009).

Trustees of the General Building Laborers' Local 66 Pension Fund v. J.M.R. Concrete Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 29, 2023

Brown v. City of Syracuse, 673 F.3d 141, 147 n.2 (2d Cir. 2012) (citing Campers’ World Int’l, Inc. v. Perry Ellis Int’l, Inc., 221 F.R.D. 409, 409 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)). … Brown, 673 F.3d at 147 n.2) (quoting Kovacevich v. Kent State Univ., 224 F.3d 806, 835 (6th Cir. 2000)); see Bonano v. Doe, 628 F. App’x 25, 27 (2d Cir. 2015) (summary order).

Johnson v. New York City Department of Education

39 F. Supp. 3d 314 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 19, 2014

(finding no inference of pretext when new management placed greater emphasis on employee’s sales numbers resulting in worse evaluations of plaintiff); Brown v. Time, Inc., 95-CV-1008, 1997 WL 231143 , at *12 (S.D.N.Y. … Gambello, 186 F.Supp.2d at 222 (quoting Beers, 1992 WL 8299 , at *11 and Brown, 1997 WL 231143 , at *12).

Fahey v. Incorporated Village of Manorhaven

District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 15, 2023

Village of Manorhaven Planning Board). … See Dukes v.

Boro Precision Products Corp. v. John Hancock Mutual Fire Insurance

223 F. Supp. 584 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 14, 1963

See, e. g., Indiana Lumbermen’s Mutual Insurance Co. v. Janes, 5 Cir. 1956, 230 F.2d 500 ; Titus v. Glens Falls Insurance Co., 1880, 81 N.Y. 410 ; Fuessler v. … Brown, 1961, 30 Misc.2d 147 , 215 N.Y.S.2d 652 . The above constitutes the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.

El Greco Leather Products Co. v. Shoe World, Inc.

623 F. Supp. 1038 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 11, 1985

Board of Education v. Farmingdale Classroom Teachers Ass’n, 38 N.Y. 397, 404 , 380 N.Y.S.2d 635, 643 , 343 N.E.2d 278, 283 (1975). … Compare Cardy v.

Verdon v. Brooklyn Heights R. Co.

157 F. 481 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 5, 1907

Smith v. Havemeyer (C. C.) 36 Fed. 927 ; O’Rourke v. Peck (C. C.) 40 Fed. 907 ; Hartford & N. Y. Transportation Co. v. Hughes (D. C.) 125 Fed. 981 . … As was said in Wendell v.

United States v. Gonzalez Athehorta

729 F. Supp. 248 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 1, 1990

Investigator Jose Rivera (“Rivera”) observed a 1985 brown, two door Toyota drive up and park on 126th Street. … United States v. Delos-Rios, 642 F.2d 42, 45 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 941 , 101 S.Ct. 2024 , 68 L.Ed.2d 330 (1981); citing Brown v.

Rubin v. Long Island Lighting Co.

576 F. Supp. 608 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 5, 1984

See Parsons v. … Similarly, in Freedman v.

McCrae v. Town Of Brookhaven

District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 16, 2024

See Victory v. … Brandon v. City of New York, 705 F. Supp. 2d 261, 276–77 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (LAP) (first citing Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 407 (1997); then citing City of Canton v.

Baynes v. Ossakow

336 F. Supp. 386 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 12, 1972

Wright v. … Although, as defendant contends, Sostre v.

Arnold v. Dow Chemical Co.

32 F. Supp. 2d 584 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 15, 1999

As a result of this diagnosis, Arnold filed a claim with the New York State Worker’s Compensation Board against Grumman in which he sought Worker’s Compensation benefits. … Id.; see generally, Zuchowicz v. United States, 140 F.3d 381 (2d Cir.1998); Iacobelli Constr., Inc. v. County of Monroe, 32 F.3d 19 (2d Cir.1994); Zwillinger v.

Rodriguez v. Barnhart

249 F. Supp. 2d 210 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 11, 2003

Townley v. Heckler, 748 F.2d 109, 112 (2d Cir.1984). 7 . See id.: see also Johnson v. Bowen, 817 F.2d 983, 985 (2d Cir.1987). 8 . 42 U.S.C. § 423 ; See Balsamo v. … Brown v. Apfel, 174 F.3d 59, 62 (2d Cir.1999) (internal quotations and citation omitted). 12 . See 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520 ; Diaz v. Shalala, 59 F.3d 307 , 311 n. 2 (2d Cir.1995). 13 . See 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520 . 14 .

Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of America v. National Electric Signaling Co.

206 F. 295 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 22, 1913

National Casket Co. v. New York & Brooklyn Casket Co. (C. C.) 185 Red. 533. The new equity rules do not enlarge this limit. … Stonemetz Printers’ Machinery Co. v. Brown Folding-Mach. Co. (C. C.) 46 Fed. 851 , citing Story’s Eq. Pl. § 389, and numerous cases. This ruling was- followed in Stuart v. Hayden, 72 Fed. 402 , 18 C. C.

Hackett v. Continental Can Co.

518 F. Supp. 1281 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 30, 1981

See Lanza v. Drexel Co., 479 F.2d 1277, 1299 (2d Cir. 1973) (en banc). … See Ernst & Ernst Co. v. Hochfelder, 425 U.S. 185, 194 , 96 S.Ct. 1375, 1381 , 47 L.Ed.2d 668 (1976); Rolf v.

Iglesias v. Hunter

District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 11, 2021

Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 482 (1972); see also United States v. … Apr. 5, 2012) (“[T]he Parole Board’s discretionary imposition of special conditions is not subject to judicial review in the absence of a showing that the board or its agents acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner

Daily v. New York City Housing Authority

221 F. Supp. 2d 390 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 11, 2002

Vincent, 454 U.S. 263 , 102 S.Ct. 269 , 70 L.Ed.2d 440 (1981); a school board meeting open to the public, see Madison Joint Sch. Dist. v. … of school board business.

Crews v. The County of Nassau

District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 18, 2019

County reconvened the Board. On April 17, 2009, the Board revoked Detective Lemma’s I. … Although the Board could have exceptional circumstances.’” Twersky v. expected Detective Lemma to rely on its Yeshiva Univ., 579 F. App’x 7, 10 (2d Cir.

Haynes v. Planet Automall, Inc.

276 F.R.D. 65 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 12, 2011

R.Civ.P. 23(a)(3); see also Brown v. Kelly, 609 F.3d 467, 475 (2d Cir.2010). … “In enacting TILA, Congress delegated authority to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors to promulgate implementing regulations and interpretations known as Regulation Z.” McAnaney v. Astoria Fin. Corp.