Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyed

4,748 results

3.84s

  • Serrano v. Cablevision Systems Corp.

    863 F. Supp. 2d 157 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 27, 2012

    When a contract clearly identifies a single document, it eliminates all reasonable doubt and thus qualifies as an effective incorporation. See Progressive Casualty Ins. Co. v. C.A. … A private cause of action can stand only if a plaintiff establishes a violation of one of the factors set forth at section 1030(c)(4)(A)(i)(I-V). Id.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Herzog v. The New York City Department of Education

    District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 24, 2024

    Schulmann, 605 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 2010), defendants have restated the second factor for establishing a prima facie case. … But the Court cannot conclude as a matter of law that the “Developing” mark, even though clearly not entirely satisfactory, means unsatisfactory.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Otazhonov v. MTA-John Doe

    District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 15, 2023

    “A plaintiff seeking to bring a lawsuit in federal court must establish that the court has subject matter jurisdiction over the action. … As such, the amended complaint must: (1) be clearly labeled as Plaintiff’s amended complaint; (2) clearly identify all Defendants against whom Plaintiff intends to assert claims; (3) allege clear, concise, plausible facts

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • McRae v. Califano

    491 F. Supp. 630 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 15, 1980

    If this is correct, no other governmental interest could qualify as compelling.” The earlier case of D.R. v. … The medical opinions reflect, if they do not clearly articulate, the two different aspects of abortion that were so clearly delineated in Roe v. Wade.

    Reversed by Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980)Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Saunders Jr v. Olatokunbo (Toks) Sofola, Esq.

    District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 11, 2025

    An action is frivolous when “either (1) ‘the factual contentions are clearly baseless, such as when allegations are the product of delusion or fantasy;’ or (2) ‘the claim is based on an indisputably meritless legal theory … It is well established that attorneys do not act under color of state law when they perform traditional functions of counsel. Polk Cty. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hudson v. Gioe

    District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 23, 2024

    Defendants that qualify for termination in their current positions, charges possibly imposed against police officer defendant for falsifying business records and penal laws 195.07, 215.40, 205.60 especially penal … A policy or custom may be established by any of the following: (1) a formal policy officially endorsed by the municipality; (2) actions taken by government officials responsible for establishing

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Leo v. General Electric Co.

    111 F.R.D. 407 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 17, 1986

    A number of courts have followed the lead established in Fashion Page . In Ross v. … Boone, who approached Witt from behind the locked lobby doors was clearly a GE employee.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Whitfield v. Tomasso

    682 F. Supp. 1287 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 14, 1988

    to render investment advice to the Trustees as to the appropriateness of investing in Dome, and the Trustees did not consult anyone who was so qualified. … ERISA § 406(b)(1), 29 U.S.C. § 1106 (b)(1), which prohibits fiduciaries from dealing with plan assets in their own interest or for their own account, clearly prohibit these two defendants from paying themselves from Fund

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. Inc. Village of East Hills

    779 F. Supp. 2d 256 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 22, 2011

    The denial issued by the ZBA is clearly based, in large part, on aesthetic concerns. … the current level of visibility of the established visual environs.”

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Canaday v. Koch

    598 F. Supp. 1139 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 17, 1984

    The court found such contacts insufficient to establish venue because they had “nothing to do with the state official actually being sued.” Id. … Measuring priority not by which complaint was filed first but by how much progress has been made in the two actions, priority should clearly be given to the state court suit.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Rackman v. Microsoft Corp.

    102 F. Supp. 2d 113 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 13, 2000

    Once it is established that a claim element falls into the means-plus-function category, special rules of construction apply. … The patent specification clearly links this data processing means with the microprocessor.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Wills v. Microgenics Corporation

    District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 4, 2025

    Swotinsky is qualified to provide these opinions. He is a board-certified physician in occupation medicine with thirty-eight years of experience. … Plaintiff also adequately establishes a question of fact as to whether his drug test result was a false positive.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Crown Heights Jewish Community Council, Inc. v. Fischer

    63 F. Supp. 2d 231 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 10, 1999

    copies of the documents listed in their Schedule I and authenticating affidavits from qualified witnesses. … Clearly, Spielman is not a witness who could offer testimony at trial supporting plaintiffs’ claim of embezzlement. The Joseph Affidavit also refers to testimony of Council Chairman Samuel Malamud.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • King v. New York City Employees Retirement System

    212 F. Supp. 3d 371 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 25, 2016

    An independent breach of a fiduciary duty claim has not been clearly stated by plaintiff. To the extent that plaintiff sought to bring an independent breach of fiduciary duty claim, it does not stand independently. … Plaintiffs membership in NYCERS does not qualify as a consumer relationship “to purchase goods and services for personal, family or household use.” Id.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Battagliese Corns v. Lapore

    District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 30, 2024

    Accordingly, collateral estoppel clearly precludes Plaintiff from relitigating the issue of equitable tolling with respect to her Title VII claims. … Plaintiff bears the burden to establish that equitable tolling is warranted. Boos v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Belfiore v. Procter & Gamble Co.

    311 F.R.D. 29 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 5, 2015

    ; and (4) whether class members were damaged by purchasing Refrigerators that were not Energy Star qualified”). … Once the injury is established, statutory damages can be calculated on a classwide basis.

    Cited 56 timesPublished
  • Peterkin v. Carr

    District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 29, 2024

    “It is well established that the submissions of a pro se litigant must be construed liberally and interpreted to raise the strongest arguments that they suggest,” Triestman v. Fed. … Under the objective prong, the gating question, therefore, is 3 Finding that Plaintiff’s claims for false arrest and deprivation of food cannot stand, the Court declines to reach Defendants’ qualified immunity argument

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Leon v. Department of Education

    16 F. Supp. 3d 184 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 29, 2014

    Penalty • “From the time she did not get her first choice of Pre-K, the evidence established that Ms. … “To establish a pri-ma facie case of age discrimination under the ADEA, a plaintiff must show that: (1) he is a member of a protected class; (2) he was qualified for his position; (3) he suffered an adverse employment action

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Pest v. Bridal Works of New York, Inc.

    268 F. Supp. 3d 413 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 27, 2017

    The evidence presented indicates clearly that plaintiff and defendants agreed that plaintiffs weekly salary would cover no more than 40 hours of work per week. … tags that were displayed on the garments she worked on (Pest Dep. at 43), as indicated supra, the Court finds that her pay stubs as interpreted by the witnesses appear to suggest a different method of payment and do not clearly

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • D'ANDREA v. Rafla-Demetrious

    3 F. Supp. 2d 239 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 25, 1996

    However, a satisfactory evaluation from one’s program director did not necessarily mean that a candidate was qualified for ABR examination and certification. … Defendants also assert the affirmative defense of qualified immunity, which plaintiff claims was waived.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.