Case law

Barlow v. Waterman Steamship Corp.

23 F. Supp. 577 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 7, 1938

The libellant was employed as a seaman on board the steamship “Panama City”. … The Berwindglen, Rawding v. Hooten, 1 Cir., 88 F.2d 125 . The libel must be dismissed.

Herz Straw Co. v. Smith

46 F.2d 479 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 13, 1931

It has, of course, been said, as in McClain v. Ortmayer, 141 U. S. 419 , 12 S. Ct. 76, 77 , 35 L. … The same situation is disclosed in Cincinnati Cadillac Co. v. English & Mersick Co. (C. C.

Frails v. City of New York

236 F.R.D. 116 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 6, 2006

By letter dated March 19, 2006, plaintiff Charles Frails moved “to compel the production of all unsubstantiated Civilian Complaint Review Board (“CCRB”), Internal Affairs Bureau (“IAB”), and internal [New York Police Department … See Sealey v. Fishkin, 1998 WL 1021470 , at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Dec.2, 1998) (unsubstantiated allegations of misconduct do not prove City’s deliberate indifference); Marcel v.

Straus v. Prudential Employee Savings Plan

253 F. Supp. 2d 438 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 24, 2003

The Plan Document also states that the Plan may be changed at any time, and gives the authority to modify the plan to the Prudential Board of Directors, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, and the Prudential … In this respect, this case is similar to Krumme v. WestPoint Stevens, Inc., 143 F.3d 71 (2d Cir.1998). In Krumme , only the company’s Board of Directors possessed the authority to amend the employee benefits plan.

Agola v. Hagner

556 F. Supp. 296 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 21, 1982

In Gurton v. … Head v. Brac, supra, 512 F.2d at 401. See Pignotti, supra; Sabolsky v. Budzanoski, supra.

Luna v. Harris

666 F. Supp. 33 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 3, 1987

Michigan Canners and Freezers Association, Inc. v. Agricultural Marketing and Bargaining Board, 467 U.S. 461, 469 , 104 S.Ct. 2518, 2522 , 81 L.Ed.2d 399 (1984). … Lance v.

Senese v. Longwood Cent. Sch. Dist.

330 F. Supp. 3d 745 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 3, 2018

Prior to working for the District, Senese worked for Eastern Suffolk Board of Cooperative Educational Services ("BOCES"). … Communication with Trustees of the Board of Education Matt Simonton ("Simonton"), a physical education teacher at Ridge, spoke to two members of the Board of Education for the District while the Plaintiff was on administrative

United States v. Payne

832 F. Supp. 594 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 1, 1993

Furthermore, defendant’s reliance on Brown v. … People v.

Danstrup v. Hobson

112 F. Supp. 851 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 28, 1953

MacInnes v. United States, 1 Cir., 189 F.2d 733 ; Desmond v. United States, D.C., 105 F. Supp. 9 . … Rodinciuc v. United States, 3 Cir., 175 F.2d 479 , certiorari denied, 338 U.S. 895 , 70 S.Ct. 234 , 94 L.Ed. 550 ; Fox v. Alcoa, S. S. Co., 143 F.2d 667 , certiorari denied 323 U.S. 788 , 65 S.Ct. 313 , 89 L.Ed. 628 .

Mandel v. Mitchell

325 F. Supp. 620 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 18, 1971

Snyder v. Board of Trustees, supra, 286 F.Supp. at 931-932 ; Smith v. University of Tennessee, E.D.Tenn. 1969, 300 F.Supp. 777, 780 . … Board of Education, 1968, 391 U.S. 563, 568-569, 572, 574 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 . In Wieman v. Updegraff, 1952, 344 U.S. 183, 195 , 73 S.Ct. 215 , 97 L.Ed. 216 , Mr.

In Re Zyprexa Products Liability Litigation

451 F. Supp. 2d 458 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 11, 2006

Thompson, 309 F.Supp.2d 253, 256-59 (D.Conn.2004) (the MSP gives the government the right to recover its share of an individual Medicare beneficiary’s tort settlement); Brown v. … Brown v. Thompson, 374 F.3d 253, 258 (4th Cir.2004); Glover v. Philip Morris, 380 F.Supp.2d 1279, 1284-85, 1295-98 (M.D.Fla.2005).

United States v. Sabhnani

529 F. Supp. 2d 384 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 14, 2008

In Brown v. Greiner, No. 02-cv-2043, 2003 WL 22964395 , 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22589 (E.D.N.Y. … Brown, 2003 WL 22964395 at *13-14, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS at *37-38. See also United States v.

Gellman v. Costa Armatori, S.P.A., Maria Costa

402 F. Supp. 216 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 21, 1975

. § 905 et seq., and (v) no negligence or unseaworthiness on the part of the defendant. *218 On the same date, the defendant filed a third-party summons and complaint against Universal Terminal & Stevedoring Corp. … Under the circumstances, the inference is inescapable that one of the boards or pieces of sheathing had a latent defect which manifested itself when plaintiff placed his left foot thereon and it gave way.

Hall v. Reliant Realty Services

District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 5, 2024

On September 19, 2022, Local 32BJ wrote to Plaintiff to inform him that the Local 32BJ Joint Executive Board had “adopted the recommendation of the Grievance Appeal Board” and had denied his appeal “based upon the determination … Supp. 2d 367, 376 (E.D.N.Y. 2001) (citing Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 316 (1979)); see also Sheehy v. Brown, 335 F.

Contreras v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP

District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 24, 2020

Brown based his recommendation).) … V.

Providence Engineering Corp. v. Downey Shipbuilding Corp.

8 F.2d 304 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 14, 1925

Laws, c. 60), to review a tax improperly assessed, precludes any review by this court of the propriety of the assessment of such tax, citing In Matter of Gorham Manufacturing Co. v. … Indeed, in the Gorham Case, supra, it is said, “A taxpayer who does not exhaust the rem *310 edy provided before an administrative board to secure tbe reviewal or correction of a tax cannot be heard by a judicial tribunal

Pollard v. New York Methodist Hospital

134 F. Supp. 3d 681 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 29, 2015

V. … In Victorelli v.

Ates v. United States

District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 22, 2020

See Ates v. Altiner, No. 20-CV-1477 (Azrack, J.) (“Ates I”); Ates v. Altiner, No. 20-CV-1479 (Azrack, J.) (“Ates II”); Ates v. Azrack, No. 20-CV-3590 (Brown, J.) … Sheehy v. Brown, 335 F.

Breslow v. Schlesinger

284 F.R.D. 78 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 7, 2012

See Nemaizer v. … United States v.

Randazzo v. Barnhart

332 F. Supp. 2d 517 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 26, 2004

See Mongeur v. … . § 405 (g); Brown v. Apfel, 174 F.3d 59, 61-62 (2d Cir.1999). Substantial evidence is “more than a mere scintilla,” Richardson v.