Case law

Ibrahim v. New York State Department of Health

692 F. Supp. 1471 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 16, 1988

Kirkland v. … This Court thus agrees with Duggan v. Board of Education, 818 F.2d 1291 (7th Cir.1987) and Rosenfeld v. Dept. of the Army, 769 F.2d 237 (4th Cir.1985), and disagrees with Stillians v.

Jusino v. Federation of Catholic Teachers, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 6, 2021

Brown v. Smith, No. 09-CV-4522, 2012 WL 511581, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 15, 2012) (quoting Kennedy v. Adamo, No. 02-CV-1776, 2006 WL 3704784, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 1, 2006)) (alterations omitted). … This conclusion is compelled by N.L.R.B. v.

Roundtree v. Berger

420 F. Supp. 282 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 17, 1976

Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2562 , 49 L.Ed.2d 520 (1976). … Frontiero v. Richardson, supra; Dandridge v. Williams, supra; Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia, supra; Geduldig v. Aiello, 417 U.S. 484, 495 , 94 S.Ct. 2485 , 41 L.Ed.2d 256 (1974).

Farmland Dairies v. Commissioner of the New York State Department of Agriculture & Markets

650 F. Supp. 939 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 8, 1987

Safeway involved an application by an out-of-state company to the Hawaii Board of Agriculture (“Board”) for a license to distribute milk products in that state. … In Safeway, Judge Pence examined the Board’s decision, found it was an effort to protect the local Hawaii dairies from out-of-state competition, and granted summary judgment declaring the Board’s denial a per se violation

STATE OF NY BY ABRAMS v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.

673 F. Supp. 664 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 19, 1987

See also Arizona v. Maricopa Medical Society, 457 U.S. 332, 343 , 102 S.Ct. 2466, 2472 , 73 L.Ed. 2d 48 (1982). In Chicago Board of Trade v. United States, 246 U.S. 231 , 38 S.Ct. 242 , 62 L.Ed. 683 (1918), Mr. … In Eiberger v.

United States v. Numisgroup International Corp.

137 F. Supp. 2d 139 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 23, 2001

See, e.g., Smith v. Ohio, 494 U.S. 541, 541-42 , 110 S.Ct. 1288, 1289 , 108 L.Ed.2d 464 (1990) (brown paper bag is a closed container); United States v. … See, e.g., U.S. v.

Multi-State Partnership for Prevention, LLC v. Samuel Kennedy and Kennedy Technology MK

District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 3, 2026

Fitzpatrick of the KRF Legal Firm (“Fitzpatrick”), and Peter Brown of the firm of Peter Brown & Associates PLLC (“Brown” and together with Fitzpatrick, “Counsel”), filed a motion to be relieved as counsel pursuant to … Finkel v. Fraterrelli Brothers, Inc., No. 05-CV-1551 (ADS)(AKT), 2006 WL 8439497, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 4, 2006) (citing Whiting v.

Daddino v. Valley Stream Central High School District

District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 31, 2022

. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also Brown v. Ebert, No. 5-CV-5579, 2006 WL 3851152, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 29, 2006). … In Tangreti, the Second Circuit held that, after Ashcroft v.

Building Industry Fund v. Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

992 F. Supp. 162 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 8, 1996

Brown v. Visa U.S.A., Inc., 674 F.Supp. 249, 251 (N.D.Ill.1987). … Leader, 310 U.S. 469 , 60 S.Ct. 982 , 84 L.Ed. 1311 (1940); Wickham Contracting Co. v. Board of Educ., 715 F.2d 21 , 29 (2d Cir.1983) (Oakes, J., dissenting); Perry v.

In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation

611 F. Supp. 1296 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 18, 1985

Brown, Esq., et al. Phillip E. Brown of San Francisco, California submitted a fee petition on behalf of himself and five other attorneys at his firm. Mr. Brown joined the PMC in September 1983. … HOBERG, FINGER, BROWN, COX & MOLLIGAN Hoberg, Finger, Brown, Cox & Molligan has moved for reconsideration of the fees awarded by the court.

Evans v. United States

978 F. Supp. 2d 148 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 31, 2013

Brown. Subsequently, on November 19, 2012, Judge Brown found the issue of whether the Plaintiff could supplement the summary judgment record with Dr. Gerard’s affidavit to be premature. … Pommells, 4 N.Y.3d at 574 , 797 N.Y.S.2d 380 , 830 N.E.2d 278 ; Garces v. Yip, 16 A.D.3d 375, 376 , 790 N.Y.S.2d 712, 714 (2d Dep’t 2005); cf. Brown v.

United States v. Doe

323 F. Supp. 3d 368 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 6, 2018

Brown ... resorted to terrorist tactics to disrupt the South's peculiar institution."). … Holder v.

Weinger v. Macy

247 F. Supp. 240 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 16, 1965

On June 22, 1964 the Board decided that the plaintiff was ineligible for the annuity and on November 10, 1964 that determination became final when it was affirmed by the Board of Appeals. … In the case of Utah Power & Light Co. v.

Niewenhous v. United States

66 F. Supp. 788 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 23, 1946

Minch, 2 Cir., 73 F. 859 ; Clarke v. The Dodge Healy, 5 Fed.Cas., page 949, No. 2,849; Drevas v. United States, D.C., 58 F.Supp. 1008 ; Elrod v. Luckenbach S. S. Co. (The Susan V. … The libelants cite: Mason v.

National Committee to Preserve Social Security v. Philip Morris USA Inc.

601 F. Supp. 2d 505 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 5, 2009

See Mason v. … Chevron, USA, Inc. v.

Horsham v. Fresh Direct

136 F. Supp. 3d 253 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 28, 2015

After failing to reach HR, Plaintiff complained to the “Labor Board.” 5 (Id.) … (quoting Cortee Indus., Inc. v. Sum Holding L.P., 949 F.2d 42 , 47 (2d Cir.1991))). . Although unclear, it appears this letter was in response to Plaintiffs ‘‘Labor Board” complaint. .

United States v. Georgescu

723 F. Supp. 912 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 25, 1989

V 1987). … Chumney v.

Spencer v. International Shoppes, Inc.

902 F. Supp. 2d 287 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 28, 2012

Bill Johnson’s Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations *295 Board, 461 U.S. 731, 741 , 103 S.Ct. 2161 , 76 L.Ed.2d 277 (1983). Id. at 31-32. … For example, in Penberg v.

Salem Inn, Inc. v. Frank

381 F. Supp. 859 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 10, 1974

Steffle v. Thompson, supra, 94 S.Ct. at 1218 ; Zwickler v. … Chapter 11 of the Code of the Town of North Hempstead provides, in part: “SECTION 1.0 Legislative Purpose— The Town Board of the Town of North Hempstead does hereby find that there exists in this Town an increasing trend

Matthews v. United States

150 F. Supp. 2d 406 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 28, 2001

See, e.g., Andrews v. … See also Moody v.