Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyed

9,793 results

1.54s

  • The Rhine

    244 F. 833 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 25, 1917

    In Patterson v. Bark Eudora, 190 U. S. 169 , 23 Sup. Ct. 821, 47 L. Ed. 1002 , the Supreme Court of the United States held, in 1903, that the prohibition applied to advances made by a foreign vessel in an American port. … In 1884 Judge Addison Brown held in The State of Maine (D. C.) 22 Fed. 734 , that this section did not apply to advances made by an American vessel within a foreign jurisdiction.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. Sanders

    271 F. Supp. 756 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 12, 1967

    ’s consent, and required Sanders also forthwith to advise the Board of all property of Kemp’s that he had. … Lee & Co., v. Veatch, 4th Cir. 1962, 301 F.2d 434 , 96 A.L.R.2d 619 ; see further, Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • The Bermuda

    27 F. 476 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 9, 1885

    Pereira, shipped on board the steam-ship Bermuda, to be transported therein from New York to Trinidad, a small-sized trunk. … The ease is different from the case of Lebeau v. General S. Nav. Co., L. R. 8 C. P. 88, cited by the libelant, because of the provision in the bill of lading-respecting jewelry.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gerrity v. Bark Kate Cann

    2 F. 241 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 27, 1880

    Co. v. Phila. & Havre de Grace 8. Tow-boat Co. 23 How. 215 ; S. B. Co. v. Chase, 16 Wall. 53 . … The Washington v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • In re Henry Klein & Co.

    1 F. Supp. 376 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 13, 1932

    Also it appears that this creditor is represented by four of five members of the board of directors, and that this result was accomplished according to the provisions of written financing agreements entered into during the … Ogden v. Gilt Edge Consolidated Mines Co. (C. C. A.) 225 F. 723 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • U.S. Airlines Pilots Ass'n v. U.S. Airways, Inc.

    859 F. Supp. 2d 283 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 16, 2012

    Generally, post-certification disputes are subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of an adjustment board. Pan Am., 789 F.2d at 141 ; see Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Indep. … V 165.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Tucker Ex Rel. Local 70 Bartender's Union of Brooklyn & Queens v. Shaw

    308 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 9, 1970

    The cases cited by the plaintiffs do not support its theory of Federal court jurisdiction, absent diversity, in *8 this ease for the claims against the employer-members of the board of trustees. Thus, both Gurton v. … Nelson v. Johnson, 212 F.Supp. 233 (D.Minn., 1963), aff’d sub nom., Johnson v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Giacchetto v. Patchogue-Medford Union Free School District

    293 F.R.D. 112 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 6, 2013

    .”); Barrett v. City of New York, 237 F.R.D. 39, 40 (E.D.N.Y.2006) (noting that the information sought “need not be admissible at trial to be discoverable”); Brown v. … In Offenback v. L.M.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • The Miami

    43 F.2d 562 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 24, 1930

    Co. v. Clyde Lighterage Co., 36 F.(2d) 1021 . Apparently the lighter was then overhauled, but such repairs as were made were insufficient to sustain the old boat which had outlived her usefulness. … Accordingly, the petition must be denied, and, as this court has jurisdiction in view of the answers and trial (Hartford Accident v. Southern Pacific, 273 U. S. 207 , 47 S. Ct. 357 , 71 L.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Rivera v. INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF FARMINGDALE

    784 F. Supp. 2d 133 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 30, 2011

    See Gladstone Realtors v. … Co. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Mitchell v. Town of Southampton

    238 F.R.D. 368 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 6, 2006

    With regard to “guidance” in dealing with the policymaker doctrine, I also pointed to the factors used to evaluate this issue as set forth in Vezzetti v. … Vezzetti, 22 F.3d at 486 , (citing Regan v. Boogertman, 984 F.2d 577, 580 (2d Cir. 1993)). The Vezzetti test therefore requires a fact-specific inquiry.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mincone v. Nassau County Community College

    923 F. Supp. 398 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 27, 1996

    See e.g., Board of Educ. v. N.Y. … See e.g., Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967); University of Pa. v. EEOC, 493 U.S. 182 , 110 S.Ct. 577 , 107 L.Ed.2d 571 (1990); Sweezy v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In re Navigazione Libera Triestina

    34 F.2d 152 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 24, 1929

    Inc. v. United States (D. C.) 295 F. 432 , it was said: “Interrogatories calling for evidence must be confined to testimony necessary to the proof of the libelant’s case (Prince Line, Ltd., v. Mayer & Lage, Inc., [D. … C.) 269 F. 651 ; Havermeyers, etc., v. Compania Transatlantic Española (D. C.) 43 F. 90 ; and Wright v. Dodge Brothers (D. C.) 300 F. 455 . The same authorities are relied on to exclude interrogatory 3.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Goldberg v. Carey

    462 F. Supp. 872 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 21, 1978

    Goldberg and Joseph V. … As the United States Supreme Court stated in Spector Motor Service, Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brochstein v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

    266 F. Supp. 223 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 22, 1967

    The later New York cases do not suggest any approach to that test, nor any retreat from the principles enunciated in the Court of Appeals cases, and neither Brown v. … Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown

    District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 26, 2026

    Morrison v. … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Martinez v. Caravan Transportation, Inc.

    253 F. Supp. 2d 403 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 21, 2003

    The sale was approved by the Board in June of 2000. … Inc., et al. v. Board Of Education of the City of New York, 102 Misc.2d 497 , 423 N.Y.S.2d 572, 573 (N.Y.Sup.1979). 3 . Lipton v. Nature Co., 71 F.3d 464, 469 (2d Cir.1995). 4 . Id. 5 . Anderson v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Amazon.com Services LLC v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board et al.

    District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 26, 2025

    The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) has exclusive jurisdiction to administer the NLRA. See Wis. Dep’t of Indus., Lab. & Hum. Rels. v. … Perez v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Amadi v. United States

    District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 5, 2025

    Brown Leather Bag, Wallet, and Luggage Plaintiff also requests the return of a brown leather bag, a wallet, and luggage. Am. Compl. at 1. … Compare Mora v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gooding v. Willard

    114 F. Supp. 853 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 31, 1953

    Labor Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 , is reasonably understood. … . § 1001 et seq., which govern these orders, O’Leary v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.