Case law

Amazon.com Services LLC v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board et al.

District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 26, 2025

The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) has exclusive jurisdiction to administer the NLRA. See Wis. Dep’t of Indus., Lab. & Hum. Rels. v. … Perez v.

The Snug Harbor

53 F.2d 407 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 25, 1931

Corp. v. Great Lakes Dredge & D. Co. (C. C. A.) 256 F. 497 . The Wreck Statute is a criminal statute (Eastern S. S. Corp. v. Groat Lakes Dredge & D. Co., supra; Sullivan v. P. … Corp. v. Great Lakes Dredge & D. Co., supra.

Smith v. Town of Hempstead Department of Sanitation Sanitary District No. 2

982 F. Supp. 2d 225 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 16, 2013

The Plaintiffs name as defendants in this case the Sanitary District; its Board of Commissioners; Robert Noble, secretary to the Board of Commissioners; Michael McDermott, the general manager for the Sanitary District; Nicholas … Cronin v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 46 F.3d 196, 202 (2d Cir.1995) (citing United States v. Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654, 655 , 82 S.Ct. 993 , 8 L.Ed.2d 176 (1962) (per curiam), and Ramseur v.

Gristede's Foods, Inc. v. Unkechuage Nation

660 F. Supp. 2d 442 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 8, 2009

Distrib. v. … Co. v.

DeFABIO v. East Hampton Union Free School Dist.

658 F. Supp. 2d 461 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 1, 2009

’s decision to the state board of education before the allegedly unconstitutional deprivation took effect”); Cohn v. … Municipalities, including school boards, cannot be held vicariously liable for the actions of an employee under § 1983. Monell v. Dep’t of Soc.

Penny v. United Fruit Co.

869 F. Supp. 122 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 28, 1994

s board; of Royal Mail's fifteen directors, four were on the parent's board. 12 . … For this period, eight directors were listed for Shaw Savill, of whom three were on Furness Withy’s board; of Royal Mail’s nine directors, four were on Furness Withy's board. 13 .

FFG-NJ Vehicle Funding Corp. v. Holtmeyer (In Re Holtmeyer)

229 B.R. 579 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 8, 1999

Id. at 495 (citing Issa Corp., 142 B.R. at 77 ; Charles & Lillian Brown’s Hotel, 93 B.R. at 53-54 ). … (NAACP) v. Town of East Haven, 70 F.3d 219, 224 (2d Cir.1995) (citing Tucker Anthony Realty Corp. v. Schlesinger, 888 F.2d 969, 975 [2d Cir.1989]); cf. Weinberger v.

DiMeglio v. Bridgestone/Firestone Americas Holding Inc.

517 F. Supp. 2d 639 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 26, 2007

Co. v. … See Celardo v. GNY Auto.

The Eros

224 F. 194 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 8, 1915

The case of Brown v. Swann, 10 Pet. 497 , 9 L. … Ed. 508 , holding that discovery is as to facts known to one party, and which should be disclosed by him, and which the complainant is unable to prove by other testimony, and also the case of Miller v. Moise (C.

Silvercup Bakers, Inc. v. Strauss

245 F. Supp. 199 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 15, 1965

In its letter to the New York State Mediation Board the Corporation has requested the Board to decide not only the issue of eliminating the swingmen but also the following issue: “ * * * would such operation constitute a … Abell Co. v. Baltimore Typographical Union, supra; International Union, U.A., A., & A.I. Wkrs. v. Cardwell Mfg. Co., 10 Cir. 1962, 304 F.2d 801 ; Maryland Telephone Union v. Chesapeake & Potomac Tel.

The Viking No. II

43 F.2d 196 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 18, 1930

He said that when he boarded tug No. 33 there was no one in the pilot house, and that he was the only person who boarded the tug No. 33 when the two tugs came into contact. … I have been referred by the libelant to De Aldamiz v. Skogland & Sons (C. C. A.) 17 F.(2d) 873 , and to Harris v. New York Central Railroad Co. (D. C.) 18 F.(2d) 141 ; and by the claimant to The Henry Maurer (D.

Burnett v. The County of Suffolk

District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 30, 2025

- against - : : 23-cv-7521 (BMC) THE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, DENNIS : BROWN … See, e.g., Santander Consumer USA, Inc. v.

Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. American Airlines, Inc.

184 F. Supp. 145 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 27, 1960

Although there is authority allowing counsel fees to plaintiffs who have commenced inter-pleader actions (see Globe Indemnity Co. v. … United States for Use and Benefit of General Electric Co. v. Browne Electric Co., D.C.Va.1959, 168 F.Supp. 806, 808 .

United States v. Pyramid Auto Sales, Inc.

50 F. Supp. 868 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 28, 1943

Appendix, § 631 et seq., by the alleged transfer of a designated new commercial motor vehicle contrary to the provisions of War Production Board Order M-100. … Everybody knows what “new” means, and the indictment need not allege a negative, Seele v. United States, 8 Cir., 133 F.2d 1015 .

Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats, Inc. v. Rubin

106 F. Supp. 2d 445 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 28, 2000

McCollum v. Board of Ed., 333 U.S. 203, 212 , 68 S.Ct. 461 , 92 L.Ed. 649 (1948). … In Board of Ed. of Kiryas Joel Village School District v.

Citibank, N.A. v. Citytrust

596 F. Supp. 369 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 26, 1984

Suffice it to note that in Sally Gee, Inc. v. … The Federal Reserve Board found no reasonable basis for concluding that there is such similarity between that name and Citytrust as to result in any unfair competition.

Ideal World Marketing, Inc. v. Duracell, Inc.

997 F. Supp. 334 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 17, 1998

See Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co., 240 U.S. 251, 259 , 36 S.Ct. 269 , 60 L.Ed. 629 (1916). … See Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co., 240 U.S. at 259 .

Doe v. U.S. Merch. Marine Acad.

307 F. Supp. 3d 121 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 20, 2018

Ruiz v. … The board conducting the administrative hearing in Withrow had also conducted the investigation giving rise to the charges before it. Id. at 54-55 , 95 S.Ct. 1456 ; see also Fuentes v.

Alvarez Sosa v. Barr

369 F. Supp. 3d 492 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 31, 2019

Ass'n v. … Ass'n v.

Rivera v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Company

340 F. Supp. 660 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 12, 1972

Tauza v. Susquehanna Coal Co., 220 N.Y. 259, 268 , 115 N.E. 915, 918 (1917); see also Beja v. Jahangiri, 453 F.2d 959, 961 (2 Cir.1972). … And in Blount v. Peerless Chemicals (P.R.)