Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyappdiv

10,000+ results

2.29s

  • Claim of Salerno v. Board of Education

    35 A.D.2d 764 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 28, 1970

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Horvay v. Board of Education

    164 A.D. 930 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 15, 1914

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Caldwell v. Board of Supervisors

    45 A.D. 42 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 1899

    Cochran v. Board of Town Auditors, 74 Hun, 83 ; People ex rel. McMillen v. Vanderpoel, 35 App. Div. 73 .) … Sutliff v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Sjogren v. Board of Trustees of Dutchess Community Coll.

    2023 NY Slip Op 02551 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 10, 2023

    Sjogren v Board of Trustees of Dutchess Community Coll. ( 2023 NY Slip Op 02551 ) Sjogren v Board of Trustees of Dutchess Community Coll. 2023 NY Slip Op 02551 Decided on May 10, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department … FORD LILLIAN WAN, JJ. 2021-00482 (Index No. 50578/19) [*1]Lynn Sjogren, respondent, v Board of Trustees of Dutchess Community College, et al., appellants, et al., defendant. Manson & McCarthy, Middletown, NY (David B.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Matter of Brown v. Commissioners of the City of New York Bd. of Elections

    123 N.Y.S.3d 839 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 2020

    Brown, appellant, v Commissioners of the City of New York Board of Elections, et al., respondents. … of Gangemi v Board of Elections in the City of N.Y. , 109 AD3d 541, 541-542 ).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. City of New York

    56 A.D.2d 304 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 13, 2008

    Plaintiff slipped and fell in a pothole while attempting to board a bus on 149th Street in the Bronx on April 17, 2000. The notice of claim was served on or about July 14, 2000, within 90 days of the incident. … the bus (see Jackson v New York City Tr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Mgrs. of Grandview Condominiums v. Medina

    2026 NY Slip Op 00341 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 28, 2026

    Board of Mgrs. of Grandview Condominiums v Medina ( 2026 NY Slip Op 00341 ) Board of Mgrs. of Grandview Condominiums v Medina 2026 NY Slip Op 00341 Decided on January 28, 2026 Appellate Division, Second Department Published … of Mgrs. of Brightwater Towers Condominium v Cheskiy , 109 AD3d 944 , 945; see also Board of Directors of Squire Green at Pawling Homeowners Assn., Inc. v Bell , 89 AD3d 657, 658 ).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pruden v. New York City Board of Education

    235 A.D.2d 426 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 13, 1997

    Town of Brookhaven, 212 AD2d 605 ; Matter of Sosa v City of New York, 206 AD2d 374 ; Matter of Shapiro v County of Nassau, 208 AD2d 545 ; Matter of Strauss v New York City Tr. … County of Nassau, 187 AD2d 720 ; Matter of Wertenberger v Village of Briarcliff Manor, 175 AD2d 922 ; Caselli v City of New York, 105 AD2d 251 ).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Board of Ethics v. Temporary State Commission

    41 A.D.2d 486 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 31, 1973

    (Matter of Langert v. Tenney, 5 A D 2d 586, 588). Applying the test laid down by Langert v. … (Matter of Langert v. Tenney, supra; People v. Keating, 286 App. Div. 150 ; Matter of Department of Investigation v. Temporary State Comm., 40 A D 2d 628.)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • St. Germain v. Zoning Board of Appeals

    35 A.D.2d 1064 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 3, 1970

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Costanzo v. Long Island Board of Realtors

    143 A.D.2d 625 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 3, 1988

    In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review an undated determination of the respondent Long Island Board of Realtors which found the petitioners to have violated article 3 of the National Association of Realtors … J., Mangano, Thompson and Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Friends of Thayer Lake LLC v. Brown

    126 A.D.3d 22 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 15, 2015

    Co. v State Tax Commn., 238 App Div at 268 ). … At the time of Brown’s trip, the seasonal road had not been opened, requiring him to leave his gear on the shore of the lake and hike 4V2 miles to the nearest county road.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Samsonian v. Board of Appeals of Inc.

    261 A.D.2d 624 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 24, 1999

    Therefore, the Supreme Court properly annulled the Board’s determination and directed that the variance be granted (see, Matter of Sasso v Osgood, 86 NY2d 374, 384-386 ; Matter of Baker v Brownlie, 248 AD2d 527 ; Matter of … Co. v Nadel, 241 AD2d 496 ; Matter of Frank v Scheyer, 227 AD2d 558 ). Mangano, P. J., Friedmann, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Yoonessi v. State Board for Professional Medical Conduct

    2 A.D.3d 1070 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 18, 2003

    On the fourth claim, the ALJ’s limitation of petitioner’s cross-examination of BPMC’s expert was not, under the circumstances, an abuse of discretion (see Matter of Friedel v Board of Regents of Univ. of N.Y., 296 NY 347, … Brown, 84 NY2d 574, 578 [1994]; Matter of Gross v New York State Dept. of Health, 277 AD2d 825, 827-828 [2000]; see also Matter of Grossherg v Christian, 245 AD2d 118, 118 [1997]).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Prote Contracting Co. v. Board of Education

    132 A.D.2d 538 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 6, 1987

    The *539 plaintiffs claim has no merit and, for that reason, summary judgment was properly granted to the defendant (see, CPLR 3212; Merritt Hill Vineyards v Windy Hgts. Vineyard, 61 NY2d 106, 112 ). Rubin, J.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Rizzo v. Board of Appeals on Zoning

    247 A.D.2d 543 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 17, 1998

    Upon our review of the record, we agree with the Supreme Court’s determination that the Board’s grant of the variance was supported by substantial evidence and was neither arbitrary nor capricious (see, Matter of Sasso v … Osgood, 86 NY2d 374 ; Matter of Fuhst v Foley, 45 NY2d 441 ; Matter of Turner v Organ, 240 AD2d 507 ).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. City of New York

    265 A.D.2d 284 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 4, 1999

    City of New York, 69 NY2d 1020 ; Baum v Knoll Farm, 259 AD2d 456 ; Fuks v New York City Tr. … Auth., 243 AD2d 678 ; Grillo v New York City Tr. Auth., 214 AD2d 648 ). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy, Altman and Smith, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fraternal Order of Eagles v. Board of Assessors

    73 A.D.3d 770 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 4, 2010

    Accordingly, the petitioner was not entitled to summary judgment and the motion should have been denied (see Zellner v Tarnell, 54 AD3d 329, 329-330 [2008]; Sendor v Chervin, 51 AD3d 1003 [2008]; Thompson v Foreign Cars Ctr … ., Inc., 40 AD3d 965 [2007]; Matsyuk v Konkalipos, 35 AD3d 675 [2006]; Sted Tenants Owners Corp. v Chumpitaz, 5 AD3d 663 [2004]).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Hines v. State of Board of Parole

    267 A.D. 99 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 16, 1943

    The judgment of conviction was affirmed by the Appellate Division (People v. Hines, 258 App. Div. 466 ) and modified and as modified affirmed by the Court of Appeals ( 284 N. Y. 93 ). … Without any further inquiry the Board denied petitioner’s application and notice of that determination was transmitted *101 to him on May 13,1943. This proceeding was then instituted to review the Board’s decision.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Landquest, Inc. v. Planning Board of Hoosick

    148 A.D.2d 831 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 9, 1989

    Although the Planning Board, after twice reviewing the proposal, expressed a number of objections, Landquest ignored the Planning Board’s concerns and presented it to the Rensselaer County Board of Health, the Rensselaer … see, e.g., Town of Hempstead v Lynne, 32 Misc 2d 312, 316 ).

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.