Opinion

Brown v. City of New York

  • 56 A.D.2d 304
  • 867 N.Y.S.2d 408
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
Nov 13, 2008
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 0.9%

The opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson Jr., J.), entered on or about January 8, 2008, which granted defendant’s motion to set aside a jury verdict and ordered a new trial on the issue of liability, with plaintiffs proof to be confined to theories set forth in her notice of claim, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, the motion denied, the verdict reinstated, and the matter remanded for trial on the issue of damages.

Plaintiff slipped and fell in a pothole while attempting to board a bus on 149th Street in the Bronx on April 17, 2000. The notice of claim was served on or about July 14, 2000, within 90 days of the incident. In combination with plaintiffs testimony at the October 2000 hearing conducted by defendant Transit Authority (NYCTA) pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h, the notice of claim gave that agency sufficient notice of the nature of the claim and the manner in which it arose, as well as the fact that plaintiff might assert a claim for breach of NYCTA’s duty to provide a safe place to board the bus (see Jackson v New York City Tr. Auth., 30 AD3d 289, 291-292 [2006]). The evidence at trial indicated plaintiff was injured while on a direct path from the bus stop to the front door of the bus (see Garcia v Hope Ambulette Serv. Corp., 307 AD2d 860 [2003] ). To the extent there was any defect in plaintiffs notice of claim, NYCTA cannot claim to have been prejudiced thereby, as the record indicates it did not undertake any meaningful investigation into plaintiffs claims until July 2005, some 18 months after service of a supplemental bill of particulars, which NYCTA concedes gave express notice of the theory of liability advanced by plaintiff at trial (see Goodwin v New York City Hous. Auth., 42 AD3d 63, 68 [2007]).

We further note that the weight of the evidence adduced at trial did not run counter to the jury’s finding of liability against NYCTA (see McDermott v Coffee Beanery, Ltd., 9 AD3d 195, 206

[2004] ). Concur—Tom, J.E, Mazzarelli, Saxe, Nardelli and Buckley, JJ.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.